Summary of judgments on disputes over contracts bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp contribute capital for land purchase in Vietnam

Below are some judgments on disputes over contracts bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp contribute capital for land purchase in Vietnam.

1. Judgment 12/2020/DS-ST dated 21/08/2020 on dispute over capital contribution contract

- Level of trial: First instance

- Judicial body: People's Court of Ben Cau district, Tay Ninh province

- Summary: Due bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp acquaintance, Mr. Pham Hong M, Mr. and Mrs. Vo Thanh L, and Mrs. Tran Thi Kim S contributed capital bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp buy the land of Mr. and Mrs. S and Mrs. M at the transfer price of VND 13,500,000,000; 10% deposit in advance. Mr. L and Mrs. S told Mr. M that they could only contribute 30% of the deposit and transfer amount; the remaining 70%, Mr. M contributes. The profit is also divided according bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp the capital contribution ratio of 30/70, Mr. M agrees. But Mr. M thinks that Mr. M has not yet collected the money, so he asked Mr. L and Mrs. S bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp lend and contribute 70% of Mr. M. Later, when the land use purpose is changed and transferred, it will be deducted and returned bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp the part that Mr. L and Mrs. S are obliged bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp contribute. Mr. L deposited 1,350,000,000 VND in advance for Mr. S and Mrs. M and signed a deposit contract at the notary office. However, near the implementation date of the transfer contract, Mr. M said that he had not collected the money and then hid it. Mr. L and his wife went bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp see Mr. and Mrs. S bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp ask for an agreement, but failed.

- Decision: Accepting the petition of Mr. L and Ms. S, forcing Mr. M bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp be obliged bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp pay Mr. L and Ms. S the amount of 1,018,767,000

2. Judgment 184/2021/DS-PT dated October 13, 2021 on dispute over capital contribution contract

- Judgment level: Appellate

- Judicial body: People's Court of Dak Lak province

- Summary: Ms. T. and Mr. H signed a capital contribution contract with Ms. Hoang Y bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp receive the transfer of land use rights. According bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp the contract, Ms. T contributed capital in cash of VND 688,000,000; Mr. H contributed capital in cash of 403,000,000 VND; and Ms. Y contributed capital with land use rights for the above 9.8ha of land and is responsible for managing the capital, receiving the transfer of land use rights and applying for the investment license bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp build the farm. Before signing the capital contribution contract, Ms. T and Mr. H had fully contributed the above capital amount bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp Ms. Y. However, Ms. Y did not perform the land transfer and farm construction investment as committed in the contract, but used the money contributed by him and her for personal purposes. Mr. H and Mrs. T asked Ms. Y bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp return the money that he and she contributed bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp Ms. Y, but Ms. Y did not pay. Therefore, Ms. T filed a lawsuit bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp request the court bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp settle: Forcing Ms. Y bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp return bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp Ms. T 688,000.00 VND of the contributed capital, Mr. H filed a lawsuit bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp request the court bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp settle by forcing Ms. Y bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp pay him back 403,000,000 VND of the contributed capital.

- Decision: Forcing Mrs. Hoang Y bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp return bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp Ms. Hoang Thi T the capital contribution amount of VND 305,000,000 and bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp Mr. Nguyen Van H the amount of capital contribution of VND 53,000,000.

3. Judgment 60/2019/DSPT dated October 15, 2019 on dispute over capital contribution contract

- Judgment level: Appellate

- Judicial body: People's Court of Thai Nguyen province

- Summary: Because of his trust in Mrs. H1, Mr. T1 has made a deposit for Ms. H1 of VND 10,000,000 so that Ms. H1 can make a red book for him bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp co-own or name the land use rights and then borrow interest bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp pay later. After he and his wife gave Ms. H1 a total amount of VND 110,000,000 and asked Ms. H1 bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp carry out procedures for him bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp co-own or separate the red book under his own name, Mrs. H1 said that he had bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp give another 40,000,000 VND bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp separate the red book. At the same time, Mrs. H1 transferred the entire land bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp her son's name, T2, and said that this land is in the planning and cannot be converted bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp residential land. He saw that Ms. H1 said before and after that she was not honest and at that time had no place bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp live, so he and his wife went down bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp Ms. H1's house many times bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp claim the money they had given. Done, Mrs. H1 again refused bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp pay. Now he asks the Court bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp force Ms. H1 bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp return him the amount of VND 110,000,000. If the payment is late, Ms. H1 must pay the bank's interest at the same time as the court settles.

- Decision: Dismissing Mr. T1's petition bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp request Mrs. H1 bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp return 110,000,000 VND for the purchase of the same land.

4. Judgment 116/2021/DSPT dated June 17, 2021 on dispute over capital contribution contract

- Level of trial: Appellate

- Judicial body: Can Tho City People's Court

- Summary: Ms. Le Thi My C invited Mr. P and Mr. Le Minh H bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp join hands bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp buy a house and land at 66/19 for 1,000,000,000 VND. He and Mr. H. agreed bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp 500,000,000 VND, at a rate of 50%, but the actual price, I don't know. At this time, Mr. H is serving his sentence, so Mr. P went bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp visit him and Mr. H agreed. After that, he assigned all the signing of contracts, registration of transfer of names, and names on land use right certificates bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp Mrs. C. and Mr. H. On April 3, 2008, Mr. P and Mrs. C, and Mr. H, signed a contract bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp contribute capital bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp buy a house under the witness of Mr. Le H. N. (brother two in the family). In 2012, Mr. P returned bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp live at house number 66/19 and in 2014 he entered the household registration book. Around 2018, he was informed that the Civil Judgment Execution Department of Can Tho City was selling house No. 66/19 bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp pay off the personal debt of Mrs. C., Mr. H. He and Mr. Le Minh H. sued bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp claim they forced Mr. Nguyen Dinh H. and Mrs. Le Thi My C. bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp pay 1/2 of the house and land value.

- Decision: Accept the plaintiff's petition.

5. Judgment on dispute over capital contribution contract No. 112/2021/DS-PT

- Level of trial: Appellate

- Judicial body: People's Court of An Giang province

- Summary: Due bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp acquaintance and trust, Mr. Nguyen Thanh N and Mr. Nguyen Van N2, Mrs. Le Thi S, jointly contributed capital bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp receive the transfer of land plots. The two parties have signed a capital contribution contract agreeing that Mr. N contributes an amount of VND 2,661,750,000, of which VND 2,500,000,000 has been made in writing, and VND 161,750,000 has not been made. According bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp the content of the capital contribution contract, Mr. N2, Ms. S is the representative bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp receive the transfer in the name of the land use rights of the above-mentioned land parcels. Mr. N2 and Mrs. S must obtain Mr. N's permission bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp mortgage or transfer these land plots.By January 2021, Mr. N2 will notify Mr. N by phone and inform Mr. N that he has a partner. I can buy land for 550,000 VND/m2. Mr. N believed it was true, so he agreed and received the amount of VND 100,000,000 from Mr. N2. On February 5, Mr. N2 and Ms. S received a deposit bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp transfer the above land plots at the price of VND 650,000/m2. Thus, the distribution of money bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp Mr. N is not in accordance with the agreement. Mr. N2 also arbitrarily transferred it bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp another person without Mr. N's opinion, so Mr. N filed a lawsuit requesting bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp divide the property under the capital contribution contract with a value of VND 650,000/m2, otherwise, the land must be divided bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp him.

- Decision: Forcing Mr. Nguyen Van N2 and Ms. Le Thi S bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp be obliged bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp pay Mr. Nguyen Thanh N the remaining withdrawal amount of 372,634,500 VND.

Key word: capital contribution contract in Vietnam | contracts bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp contribute capital for land purchase in Vietnam | land purchase in Vietnam | capital contributions in Vietnam |

PleaseLoginbóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp be able bóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp download