trực tiếp bóng đá k+Summary of 46 answers to questions related to Precedents in Vietnam

Recently, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Precedent Department of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Department of Legal Affairs and Scientific Management of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People's Court has compiled answers to questions related to precedents in Vietnam. Specifically:

1. Answering questions related to Criminal Precedents:

Question 1:In an accomplice case, if it can be proven that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mastermind's subjective intention was to only hire others to injure trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim without trực tiếp bóng đá k+ intention of taking their life (trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mastermind only requests to cause injury to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim's legs and arms but does not request to attack vital parts of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ body that could potentially lead to death); trực tiếp bóng đá k+ practitioner also complied with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mastermind's request; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim's death is beyond trực tiếp bóng đá k+ subjective consciousness of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mastermind. In this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mastermind must bear criminal responsibility for what crime?

Reply:

Quyết định giám đốcguides as follows:"In a case involving accomplices, if it can be proven that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mastermind's subjective intention was to only hire others to injure trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim without trực tiếp bóng đá k+ intention of taking their life (trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mastermind only requests to cause injury to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim's legs and arms, but does not request to attack vital parts of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ body that could potentially lead to death); trực tiếp bóng đá k+ practitioner also complied with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mastermind's request; If trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim's death is beyond trực tiếp bóng đá k+ subjective consciousness of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ conspirator, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ conspirator must be criminally responsible for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ crime of "Intentionally causing injury" with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ framing circumstance being "causing injury leading to death".

Therefore, in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mastermind will be criminally responsible for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ crime of "Intentionally causing injury" with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ framing detail being "causing injury leading to death".

- Relevant legal regulations:

Clause 3, Article 104 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Penal code No. 15/1999/QH10(Point a, Clause 4, Article 134 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+xem bóng đá trực)

Question 2:In trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case of accomplices, just because of a small conflict in daily life, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ accomplices invited each other to beat trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim. When doing so, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ practitioner uses a machete to repeatedly slash trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim's head, face, legs, and arms; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ fact that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim does not die is beyond trực tiếp bóng đá k+ subjective wishes of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ practitioner. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ instigator was not present when trực tiếp bóng đá k+ perpetrator committed trực tiếp bóng đá k+ crime. He did not know that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ practitioner was using a machete to slash vital areas of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim's body but allowed trực tiếp bóng đá k+ consequences to occur. In this case, what crimes are trực tiếp bóng đá k+ accomplices prosecuted for?

Reply:

According toPrecedent No. 17/2018/AL, in this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ practitioner must be prosecuted for criminal liability for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ crime of "Murder" with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ framing circumstance being "Hooligan nature". trực tiếp bóng đá k+ instigator is only criminally prosecuted for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ crime of "Murder" but is not subject to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ framing circumstance "Having a hooligan nature" at Point n, Clause 1, Article 93 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Penal code No. 15/1999/QH10.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Point n, Clause 1, Article 93 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Penal code No. 15/1999/QH10(corresponding to Point n, Clause 1, Article 123 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+xem bóng đá trực);

- Clause 2, Article 93 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Penal code No. 15/1999/QH10(corresponding to Clause 2, Article 123 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+xem bóng đá trực).

Question 3:trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant was asked by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ traffic police to stop his car to handle trực tiếp bóng đá k+ violation, but he did not comply and drove trực tiếp bóng đá k+ car straight into trực tiếp bóng đá k+ traffic police. When trực tiếp bóng đá k+ traffic policeman stopped him, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant continued to drive trực tiếp bóng đá k+ vehicle at high speed. As a result, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ traffic policeman was injured. For what crime was trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant prosecuted?

Reply:

In this case, applyingBản án về vtv5 trực, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant must be criminally responsible for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ crime of "Murder" with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ framing circumstance being "Murder while on duty." according to point d, clause 1, Article 93 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Penal code No. 15/1999/QH10(corresponding to point d, clause 1, Article 123 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+xem bóng đá trực).

Relevant legal provisions:

Point d, Clause 1, Article 93 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Penal code No. 15/1999/QH10(corresponding to Point d, Clause 1, Article 123 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+xem bóng đá trực).

Question 4:trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant took advantage of loopholes in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ bank's management, many times directly carrying out procedures to withdraw and spend savings from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ bank branch's funds managed by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant, but did not actually pay anyone for whom trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant used this money. During trực tiếp bóng đá k+ investigation process, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant recovered part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ money that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant had appropriated, so what crime should trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant be held criminally responsible for? How is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property appropriated by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant determined?

Reply:

In this case, according to Precedent No.19/2018AL, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant must be criminally responsible for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ crime of "Embezzlement of property". trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property appropriated by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant must be determined as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ entire amount of money that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant has withdrawn and spent false savings from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ bank branch's fundwhich includes trực tiếp bóng đá k+ amount of money trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant recovered during trực tiếp bóng đá k+ investigation process.

Relevant legal provisions:

Points b and p, Clause 1, Clause 2, Article 46; Article 47; Article 60; Point c, Clause 2, Article 278 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Penal code No. 15/1999/QH10(corresponding to Points b and s, Article 51; Article 54; Article 65, Point c, Clause 2, Article 353 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+xem bóng đá trực);

Question 5:In a state of loss of self-control, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim committed a series of illegal acts that continuously and prolongedly attacked trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant, causing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant to be psychologically inhibited and mentally agitated, so trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant used a knife to stab trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim to escape trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim's attack, leading to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim's death. In this case, what crime must trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant be prosecuted for?

Reply:

According to Precedent No.28/2019/AL, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim committed a series of illegal acts of continuous and prolonged attacks on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant, causing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant to be psychologically inhibited and mentally agitated. In a state of loss of self-control, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant used a knife to stab trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim to escape trực tiếp bóng đá k+ attack. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant was not fully aware of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ nature and level of danger of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ act he committed. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ consequences lead to death. In this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant must be prosecuted for criminal liability for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ crime of "Murder in a highly agitated mental state" according to Clause 1, Article 95 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Penal code No. 15/1999/QH10(corresponding to Clause 1, Article 125 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+xem bóng đá trực).

Question 6:A person who uses force to attack trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim, causing them to fall into a state where they cannot resist, with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aim of not paying trực tiếp bóng đá k+ amount of money that person is obliged to pay to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim, will be punished. about what crime?

Reply:

According toQuyết địtrực tiếp bóng đá, in cases where trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant uses force to attack trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim, leaving them in a state where they cannot resist for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ purpose of not paying trực tiếp bóng đá k+ amount of money that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person is obliged to pay to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant will be prosecuted for criminal liability for robbery according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of Article 133 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Penal code No. 15/1999/QH10(corresponding to Article 168 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+xem bóng đá trực).

Question 7:What is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ criminal offense of intentionally driving a vehicle over a victim after causing an accident?

Reply:

According tobóng đá hôm nay trực tiếp, after causing a traffic accident for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim, it was not determined whether trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim was alive or dead, but trực tiếp bóng đá k+ driver continued to drive trực tiếp bóng đá k+ car over trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ consequence is death. This case must be prosecuted for criminal liability for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ crime of "Murder".

2. Answering questions related to Civil Precedents:

Question 8:In trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case of a Vietnamese residing abroad who has spent money to receive a transfer of land use rights and asked someone in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ country to accept trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transfer of land use rights on their behalf. When deciding, how does trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court determine trực tiếp bóng đá k+ effort to manage and preserve assets in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ household's name?

Reply:

According totrực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay, "In cases where Vietnamese people residing abroad have spent money to receive land use rights transfers and ask someone in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ country to transfer land use rights on their behalf, when resolving disputes, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court must consider and calculate trực tiếp bóng đá k+ effort to preserve, preserve, and embellish to increase trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of land use rights for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person in whose name trực tiếp bóng đá k+ household is named. In cases where it is not possible to determine trực tiếp bóng đá k+ exact effort of that person, it is necessary to determine whether trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person who actually paid to receive trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transfer of land use rights and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person whose name was transferred to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ household's land use rights had equal efforts to divide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ additional value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ difference compared to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ original amount received from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ original transfer of land use rights."

Based on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above regulations, when resolving disputes, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court must consider and calculate trực tiếp bóng đá k+ effort to preserve, preserve, and embellish to increase trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of land use rights for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person in whose name trực tiếp bóng đá k+ household is named; In case it is not possible to accurately determine trực tiếp bóng đá k+ effort of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person in whose name trực tiếp bóng đá k+ household is named, it is necessary to determine trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person who actually paid and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person in whose name trực tiếp bóng đá k+ household's name is credited with equal efforts.
to divide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ additional value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ difference compared to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ original amount received from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ original transfer of land use rights.

- Relevant legal regulations:

Article 137 and Article 235 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11.

Question 9:trực tiếp bóng đá k+ child and his wife were given an area of land by their parents, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ child and his wife built a solid house on that land area as a place to live. when trực tiếp bóng đá k+ child and his wife built a house, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parents and other family members had no objections; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ child and his wife have used trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land continuously, publicly, and stably, and they have declared and been granted a land use right certificate. In this case, is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use right trực tiếp bóng đá k+ common property of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ child and his wife?

Reply:

Precedent No. 03/2016/ALguides as follows:"In cases where trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parents have given trực tiếp bóng đá k+ son and his wife an area of land and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ child and his wife have built a permanent house on that land area for a residence, when trực tiếp bóng đá k+ son and his wife built a house, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parents and other family members had no objections; if trực tiếp bóng đá k+ son and his wife have used trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land continuously, openly, and stably, and have conducted a land declaration and been granted a land use right certificate, it must be determined that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ son and his wife have been given land use rights."Based on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above regulations, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court must determine that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above land area is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ common property of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ child and his wife, whose parents have given them land use rights.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Article 14 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 21-LCT/HDNN7 of December;

- Article 242 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Civil Code 1995;

- Clause 2, Article 176 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Code 1995.

Question 10:A real estate transfer is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ common property of a husband and wife to another person, but only one person signs trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transfer contract. If there are enough grounds to determine that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transferee has received trực tiếp bóng đá k+ full amount as agreed, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person who did not sign trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract knows and uses trực tiếp bóng đá k+ real estate transfer money; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transferee of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ real estate has received, managed, and used that real estate publicly; and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person who did not sign trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract knew without any objection. In this case, will trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court recognize trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above real estate transfer contract?

Reply:

Quyết định giám đốcguides as follows:“In case trực tiếp bóng đá k+ real estate is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ common property of husband and wife, only one person signs trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract to transfer trực tiếp bóng đá k+ real estate to another person; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ other person does not sign trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract; if there are enough grounds to determine that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transferor has received trực tiếp bóng đá k+ full amount as agreed, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person who did not sign trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract knows and uses trực tiếp bóng đá k+ real estate transfer money; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transferee of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ real estate has received, managed, and used that real estate publicly; if trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person who does not sign trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract knows and has no objections, it must be determined that he or she agrees with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transfer of real estate."Therefore, in this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court must determine that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person who did not agree with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above contract agreed to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ real estate transfer, thereby recognizing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above real estate transfer contract.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Clause 2, Article 176 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Code 1995;

- Article 15 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on Marriage and Family 1986.

Question 11:In a dispute over trực tiếp bóng đá k+ division of inheritance, there is a litigant who is entitled to part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance and has contributed to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ management and improvement of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance but does not agree to divide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance (because trực tiếp bóng đá k+ statute of limitations for filing lawsuits regarding inheritance has expired); there is no specific requirement to consider their contributions to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ management and improvement of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance. In this case, when trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court decides to divide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance among trực tiếp bóng đá k+ heirs, will it consider this litigant's contributions to managing and enhancing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance?

Reply:

Quyết định giám đốcprovides instructions as follows:

“In an inheritance dispute case, there is a litigant who is entitled to part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance and has contributed to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ management and improvement of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance but does not agree to divide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance (because trực tiếp bóng đá k+ statute of limitations for initiating lawsuits regarding inheritance has expired), and there is no specific requirement to consider their contributions to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ management and improvement of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance; If trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court decides to divide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance among trực tiếp bóng đá k+ heirs, it must consider their contributions because trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request not to divide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance is greater than trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request to consider their efforts."

Pursuant to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above regulations, in this case, although trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigant is entitled to part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance, he does not request that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court consider his contributions to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ management and restoration of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance. However, when trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court decides to divide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance among trực tiếp bóng đá k+ heirs, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court must still consider trực tiếp bóng đá k+ effort contributed to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ management and improvement of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance of this litigant because trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request for non-inheritance of this litigant's inheritance is greater than trực tiếp bóng đá k+ requirement to consider trực tiếp bóng đá k+ effort contributed to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ management and improvement of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance.

Relevant legal provisions:

Clause 1, Article 5 and Article 218 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No.24/2004/QH11 đá bóng;

Question 12:Does an individual have trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to make a will to determine trực tiếp bóng đá k+ compensation value for land in case land is recovered by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State and will there be compensation?

Reply:

According to Precedent No.34/2020/AL, taking effect on April 15, 2020, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State shall provide compensation for land with land use rights legally created by an individual while that person is still alive upon land recovery. In this case, it must be determined that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ recovered land use rights is guaranteed by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ compensation value, so trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person whose land is recovered has trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to make a will to determine that compensation value.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Articles 163, 181, 634, 646, and 648 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11(corresponding to Clause 1, Article 105, Articles 115, 612, 624, and 626 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Code 2015);

- Article 42 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 13/2003/QH11(corresponding to Article 74 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+xem bóng đá trực).

Question 13: Can Vietnamese people residing abroad reclaim trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to use agricultural land that was allocated to people in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ country for use before settling abroad?

Reply:

According toPrecedent No. 35/2020/AL regardingtaking effect on April 15, 2020, Vietnamese people, before settling abroad, handed over agricultural land to people in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ country to use; People living in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ country have used that land stably and long-term and have been granted a land use right certificate. In this case, it must be determined that people in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ country have legal land use rights. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court will not accept trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request to reclaim land use rights.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Section 3, Part III, Section 3, Part V, Decision No. 201-HDCP/QD dated July 1, 1980 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Government Council on unifying land management and strengthening land management throughout trực tiếp bóng đá k+ country;

- Article 14 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Land Law 1987; Article 26 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 24-L/CTN; Clause 11, Article 38, Article 50 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Land Law 2003 (corresponding to Point h, Clause 1, Article 64; Article 100 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Land Law 2013).

Question 14:In case trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Land Use Rights Certificate is revoked or canceled due to errors in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land area and procedures for granting land use rights certificates. If trực tiếp bóng đá k+ revocation cancels trực tiếp bóng đá k+ user's legal land use rights certificate and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ validity of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use rights mortgage contract does not take away trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land user's legal land use rights, will trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mortgage contract be valid?

Reply:

According toPrecedent No. 36/2020/AL, taking effect on April 15, 2020, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use rights mortgage contract complied with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ law, but then trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use rights certificate was revoked or canceled due to errors in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land area and order and procedures for granting land use rights certificates. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ revocation or cancellation of a land use right certificate does not take away trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal land use rights of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land user. In this case, it is necessary to determine whether trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use rights mortgage contract is legally effective.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Articles 322, 343 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11; Articles 342, 411 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11(corresponding to Articles 317, 408 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13);

- Articles 61 and 62 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Land Law 2003; Articles 46 and 106 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Land Law 2003 (corresponding to Articles 95 and 167 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Land Law 2013).

Question 15:After trực tiếp bóng đá k+ premium payment period ends, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance buyer will pay trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance premium to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance company. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance company has no opinion and no written notice to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance buyer about trực tiếp bóng đá k+ termination of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract but still receive insurance premiums, issue value-added invoices, and report taxes on insurance premium payments. When an insured event occurs, will trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance buyer receive insurance?

Reply:

According toPrecedent No. 37/2020/AL, taking effect on April 15, 2020, after trực tiếp bóng đá k+ end of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance premium payment period as agreed in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property insurance contract, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance buyer only pays trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance premium to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance company. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance company has no opinion and no written notice to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance buyer about trực tiếp bóng đá k+ termination of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract but still receives insurance premiums, issues value-added invoices, and reports taxes on insurance premium payments. Then trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance event occurs. In this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance contract is effective, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance company is responsible for compensating trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insured for damages.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Articles 285,287 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11(corresponding to Articles 278, 354 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13);

- Articles 15 and 23 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No.24/2000/QH10 trực tiếp bóng (Law No: 61/2010/QH12).

Question 16:Assets are home ownership and land use rights that have been divided by legally effective judgments or decisions of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court. Does a person who is not a litigant in that case have trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to initiate a new lawsuit to claim ownership of that house and land use rights?

Reply:

According toPrecedent No. 38/2020/AL,taking effect on November 15, 2020, after trực tiếp bóng đá k+ assets of house ownership and land use rights have been divided by a legally effective judgment or decision of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court, someone else (not a litigant in that case) sues to claim ownership of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land use rights. In this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court will not accept a new case. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person who claims home ownership and land use rights shall notify in writing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ competent person to review trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legally effective judgment or decision of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court according to cassation or retrial procedures, according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ regulations of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law.

Relevant legal provisions:

Point c, Clause 1, Article 192, Point g, Clause 1, Article 217, Clause 2, Article 327, Clause 1, Article 353 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Code No. 92/2015/QH13 dated.

Question 17:trực tiếp bóng đá k+ tenant of a state-owned house (seller) commits that after purchasing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ state, it will transfer ownership of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller received trực tiếp bóng đá k+ money and delivered trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer, but then trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State did not price it and did not recognize home ownership. Is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above civil transaction valid?

Reply:

According toPrecedent No. 39/2020/AL, taking effect on November 15, 2020, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ tenant of state-owned housing (trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller) commits that after purchasing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ state will transfer home ownership to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller received trực tiếp bóng đá k+ money and delivered trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer, but then trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State did not price it and did not recognize home ownership. In this case, it must be determined that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house ownership transfer contract is a civil transaction with conditions but is invalid because trực tiếp bóng đá k+ conditions of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract cannot occur.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Article 23 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Ordinance No. 52-LCT/HDNN8 kết quả(corresponding to Clause 6, Article 406 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11, Clause 6, Article 402 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13);

- Article 21 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ 2005 Housing Law (corresponding to Article 10 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ 2014 Housing Law);

- Article 256 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11(corresponding to Article 166 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13).

Question 18:Is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ conversion of land use rights recognized in cases where trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties exchange land use rights but do not have a written agreement; Have trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties used trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land stably, long-term, without disputes, registered, declared and been granted a certificate of land use rights for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ converted land?

Reply:

According toPrecedent No. 40/2021/AL, taking effect on April 15, 2021, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties exchange land use rights in reality, without a written agreement; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties have used trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land stably, long-term, without disputes, registered, declared, and been granted a certificate of land use rights for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ converted land. In this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ actual conversion of land use rights must be recognized; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties have land use rights for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ converted land area.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Clause 2, Article 3 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Land Law 1993 (corresponding to Clause 1, Article 106 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Land Law 2003; Clause 1, Article 167 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Land Law 2013);

- Clause 2, Article 170 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11(corresponding to Clause 2, Article 221 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13).

Question 19:Determining trực tiếp bóng đá k+ actual termination of marriage in cases where a man and woman lived together as husband and wife without registering their marriage, but after that, they no longer lived together; and before trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on Marriage and Family 1986 took effect, they lived together as husband and wife. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first marriage relationship and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ second marriage relationship are both de facto marriages.

Reply:

According totrực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay, taking effect on April 15, 2021, men and women lived together as husband and wife; they did not register marriage, but after that, they no longer lived together; and before trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on Marriage and Family 1986 took effect, they lived together as husband and wife with another person. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first marriage relationship and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ second marriage relationship are both de facto marriages. In this case, it must be determined that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first de facto marriage has ended.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Article 676 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11(corresponding to Article 651 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13);

- Nghị quyết 35/2021/QH15 về thídated June 9, 2000 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ National Assembly on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ implementation of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on Marriage and Family 2000;

- Nghị quyết 02/2000/NQ-HĐTP về việcdated December 23, 2000 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People's Court on guiding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ application of a number of provisions of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on Marriage and Family 2000.

Question 20:In case trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mortgaged property is real estate transferred by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mortgagor from another person, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mortgagor has been granted a certificate of house ownership and land use rights but has not paid trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller in full; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties have not yet delivered trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house; If trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller knows and agrees to let trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer mortgage trực tiếp bóng đá k+ real estate, is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mortgage contract valid?

Reply:

According to Precedent No.43/2021/AL, taking effect on April 15, 2021, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract to transfer house ownership and land use rights has been notarized, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer has been issued a certificate of house ownership and land use rights but has only paid part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land purchase price; and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties have not yet carried out trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house delivery. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer mortgages trực tiếp bóng đá k+ real estate to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Bank, registering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mortgage in accordance with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ law; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller knew and agreed to let trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer mortgage trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land, but then requested to cancel trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract to transfer house ownership and land use rights. In this case, it is necessary to determine whether trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mortgage contract is legally effective and not accept trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request to cancel trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract to transfer housing ownership and land use rights.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Articles 168, 323, 342, 425, 438, and 689 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11(corresponding to articles 161, 298, 318, 423, 440, and 502 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13); Articles 439, 692 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11;

- Article 10 ofDecree lịch trực tiếp bóngdated December 29, 2006 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Government on secured transactions

Question 21:trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties voluntarily agreed verbally with each other on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ conversion of agricultural land use rights before October 15, 1993; Registered and declared trực tiếp bóng đá k+ changed land area and recorded it in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cadastral book; If trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transaction has been directly cultivated and used stably, continuously, and long-term, will trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transaction be recognized?

Reply:

In this case, according to Precedent No.15/2017/AL, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land exchange must be recognized as reality, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court must recognize trực tiếp bóng đá k+ oral agreement of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ conversion of agricultural land use rights to determine trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties who have trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to use trực tiếp bóng đá k+ changed land area.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Clause 2, Article 16 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+trực tiếp bóng.

- Clause 2, Article 170 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11.

Question 22:Inheritance is real estate that has been transferred by one of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ co-heirs. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ other co-heirs knew and did not object to that transfer. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transferred money was used to take care of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lives of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ co-heirs. If trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transferee has been granted a certificate of land use rights, is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transfer contract invalid?

Reply:

In this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court must recognize trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use rights transfer contract as legal, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transferred land area is no longer part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance block but belongs to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transferee's right to use according to Precedent No.16/2017/AL.

Relevant legal provisions:

Clause 2, Article 170, Article 234, Article 634, and Article 697 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11(equivalent to Clause 2, Article 221, Article 223, Article 612, and Article 500 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13).

Question 23:trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property lease contract has a term, there is no agreement on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ conditions for terminating trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lessee terminates trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract ahead of time without trực tiếp bóng đá k+ consent of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lessor. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time between trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lessee's written notice and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ termination of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract is so short that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lessor cannot have another replacement contract within trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remaining term of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lease. Is it acceptable for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lessor to request that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lessee pay trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property rental for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remaining term of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract?

Reply:

In this case, based on Precedent No.21/2018/AL, it must be determined that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lessee is at fault and must be responsible for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ damage caused to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lessor. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ actual damages to consider are trực tiếp bóng đá k+ vehicle rental payments for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remaining period of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Article 426 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11(corresponding to Article 428 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13);

- Articles 269, 302, and 303 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Commercial Law No.36/2005/QH11,.

Question 24:trực tiếp bóng đá k+ life insurance contract, insurance rules, and insurance application have unclear requirements regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ declaration of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insured's medical condition. If trực tiếp bóng đá k+ information required to be declared is not trực tiếp bóng đá k+ basis for deciding whether trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties establish a life insurance contract, is it considered a dishonest declaration and a violation of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ obligation to provide information?

Reply:

In this case, it must be determined that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance buyer does not violate trực tiếp bóng đá k+ obligation to provide information when signing an insurance contract or insurance request, according to Precedent No.22/2018/AL.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Clause 2, Article 407 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11(corresponding to Clause 2, Article 405 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13);

- Clause 4, Article 409 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11(corresponding to Clause 3, Article 404 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13);

- Article 21 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on Insurance Business 2000 was amended and supplemented in 2010.

Question 25:trực tiếp bóng đá k+ life insurance request document shows that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance buyer chooses trực tiếp bóng đá k+ method of collecting insurance premiums at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance buyer's home address. When trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance premium payment deadline comes and during trực tiếp bóng đá k+ premium payment extension period, if trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance company employee does not come to collect trực tiếp bóng đá k+ premium from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance buyer, will trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance buyer get a refund, and will trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance contract become invalid?

Reply:

According toPrecedent no. 23/2018/AL, in this case, it must be determined that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance buyer is not at fault for not paying trực tiếp bóng đá k+ premium. A life insurance contract does not become invalid because trực tiếp bóng đá k+ policyholder does not pay trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance premium within trực tiếp bóng đá k+ agreed-upon period.

Relevant legal provisions:Article 23 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on Insurance Business 2000 was amended and supplemented in 2010

Question 26:One party mortgages his/her land use rights and assets attached to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land to ensure trực tiếp bóng đá k+ performance of civil obligations, but on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land there are also assets owned by another person; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ form and content of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract are in accordance with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of law. In this case, will trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court recognize trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above mortgage contract?

Reply:

- Precedent No.11/2017/ALprovides instructions as follows:

“- Precedent situation:

One party mortgages his/her own land use rights and assets attached to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land to ensure trực tiếp bóng đá k+ performance of civil obligations, but there are also assets owned by another person on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ form and content of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract are in accordance with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ law.

- Legal solutions:

In this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court must determine that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mortgage contract is legally valid."Based on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above regulations, in this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court must recognize trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mortgage contract.

Relevant legal provisions:

Article 342 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11(corresponding to Article 318 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13);

Article 715 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11;

Section 4, Clause 19, Article 1 of Decree No.Decree No. 11/2012/ND-CPdated February 22, 2012 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Government amending and supplementing a number of articles of Decree No.Decree lịch trựcdated December 29, 2006 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Government on secured transactions (codified in Clause 2, Article 325 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13).

Question 27:trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mortgagor and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mortgagee agree that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mortgagee can sell trực tiếp bóng đá k+ secured asset, which is land use rights on which there is a house that is not owned by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land user. In trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case of selling secured assets, how does trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court ensure trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal rights and interests of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ party whose assets are not owned by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land user?

Reply:

Precedent No.11/2017/ALprovides instructions as follows:

“Precedent situation:

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mortgagor and mortgagee agree that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mortgagee is allowed to sell trực tiếp bóng đá k+ secured asset, which is land use rights on which there is a house that is not owned by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land user.

Legal solution:

In this case, when resolving, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court must give trực tiếp bóng đá k+ home owners on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land trực tiếp bóng đá k+ priority right to transfer land use rights if they have a need." Therefore, in this case, when trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court resolves trực tiếp bóng đá k+ sale of secured assets, it must give priority to receiving trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transfer of that land use right to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ party whose assets are not owned by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land user if they have a need.

Relevant legal provisions:

Article 342 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11(corresponding to Article 318 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13); Article 721 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11.

Question 28:trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court decided to postpone trực tiếp bóng đá k+ trial, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ reason for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ postponement was not due to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ fault of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigant (plaintiff, defendant, or person with related rights and obligations) or trực tiếp bóng đá k+ representative or protector of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigant's legitimate rights and interests. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ trial is reopened, but there is a litigant, representative, or person protecting trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legitimate rights and interests of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigant who was duly summoned and is absent. How many times is it determined to be absent after being duly summoned?

Reply:

According to Precedent No.12/2017/AL, taking effect on February 15, 2018, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court must determine that this is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case where trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigant or trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigant's representative or protector of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigant's legitimate rights and interests is legally summoned for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first time but is absent from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ trial.

Relevant legal provisions:

Clause 1, Article 199, Article 202, Clause 2, Article 266 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Procedure Code 2004 (Clause 1, Article 227, Article 228, Clause 2, Article 296 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Procedure Code 2015).

Question 29:If trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use transfer contract does not explicitly state trực tiếp bóng đá k+ conditions of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transfer but other documents indicate that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties have reached an agreement and consensus on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ conditions of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transfer, and these conditions are legal, can trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transfer contract be considered a conditional gift contract?

Reply:

In this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigant can present documents such as a power of attorney or commitments proving that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties have agreed on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ conditions for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ gift, then recognize trực tiếp bóng đá k+ conditions of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract to donate land use rights and determine that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract to donate land use rights is a conditional contract to donate assets according to Precedent No.14/2017/AL.

Relevant legal provisions:

Article 125, Article 126, and Article 470 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11(corresponding to Article 120, Article 121, and Article 462 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13).

Question 30:In an inheritance dispute case with an heir abroad, if trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court has implemented a judicial mandate and collected evidence in accordance with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ law, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ addresses of those people still cannot be determined. In this case, will trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court resolve trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff's lawsuit request? How will trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court resolve to ensure trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal rights and interests of absent heirs?

Reply:

Precedent No.06/2016/ALprovides instructions as follows:

“In an inheritance dispute case where an heir is overseas, if trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court has performed a judicial mandate and collected evidence in accordance with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of law but still cannot determine trực tiếp bóng đá k+ addresses of those people, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court will still resolve trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff's request; if trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance is determined, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance is identified, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person leaving trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance does not have a will, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance will be resolved for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of law; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance assets of absent people whose addresses cannot be determined will be temporarily handed over to those living in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ country to manage and later handed over to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ absent heirs."

- Point a, Clause 3, Article 6 of Resolution No.Nghị quyết 04/2017/NQ-HĐTPdated May 5, 2017 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People's Court guiding a number of provisions in Clause 1 and Clause 3, Article 192 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Procedure Code No. 92/2015/QH13 on returning trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lawsuit petition, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to file a lawsuit again, and instructions:

“a) For a dispute over property inheritance involving a person with related rights and obligations who is subject to inheritance but trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff cannot provide an address and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court has taken measures to collect and verify trực tiếp bóng đá k+ address in accordance with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of law but still cannot determine trực tiếp bóng đá k+ address of that person, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court will still resolve trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of law. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ portion of property that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person with related rights and obligations as an heir has not yet found an address to receive will be temporarily assigned by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court to that person's relatives or other heirs for management. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ rights and obligations of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person with related rights and obligations in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance category whose address has not yet been found will be resolved by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court in another case upon request;”

Based on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above instructions, in this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court will still consider and resolve trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff's request; If trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance is determined, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance is identified, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person leaving trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance does not have a will, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance shall be resolved according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of law; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ absent person is received by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court and temporarily assigned to that person's relatives or other heirs to manage. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ rights and obligations of absent heirs whose addresses have not been found will be resolved by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court in another case upon request.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Article 93; Point dd, Clause 1, Article 168 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Procedure Code 2004;

- Articles 676 and 685 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11.

Question 31:trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house purchase contract was made in writing before July 1, 1991, signed by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller, clearly stating that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller had received full payment; Although trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer has not signed trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract, he is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ holder of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract and has managed and used trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house stably for a long time without trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller having any dispute claiming money to buy trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house. When a dispute arises, will trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court recognize trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above house purchase contract?

Reply:

Precedent No.07/2016/ALprovides instructions as follows:

“Consideration of Precedent:

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house purchase and sale contract was made in writing before July 1, 1991, signed by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller, clearly stating that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller had received full payment; Although trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer has not signed trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract, he is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ holder of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract and has managed and used trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house stably for a long time without trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller having any dispute claiming money to buy trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house.

Legal solution:

In this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract is valid and determines that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer has paid trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller in full, and if trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer's will agrees with that house sale contract, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house sale contract is recognized. Based on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above regulations, when a dispute occurs, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court must determine whether trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house sale contract is valid, whether trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer has paid trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller in full, and whether trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer's will agrees with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house sale contract thereby recognizing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above house purchase and sale contract.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Articles 81, 82, and 83 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Procedure Code 2004 (corresponding to Articles 93, 94, 95 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Procedure Code 2015);

- Resolution No.trực tiếp bóng đá k+dated August 20, 1998 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ National Assembly Standing Committee on civil housing transactions established before July 1, 1991.

Question 32:In a credit contract concluded before trực tiếp bóng đá k+ effective date of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13(January 1, 2017), trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties have an agreement on loan interest rates, including: current loan interest rates, overdue debt interest rates, and adjusting lending interest rates from time to time by banks or credit institutions that lend, but at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first instance, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ borrower has not paid or has not fully paid trực tiếp bóng đá k+ principal and interest according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ credit contract. In this case, what interest rate must trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court apply from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ next day of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first instance trial?

Reply:

Precedent No.08/2016/ALprovides instructions as follows:

- Precedent situation:

In trực tiếp bóng đá k+ credit contract, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties have an agreement on loan interest rates, including: current loan interest rates, overdue debt interest rates, and adjusting lending interest rates from time to time by banks or credit institutions that lend, but at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first instance, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ borrower has not paid or has not fully paid trực tiếp bóng đá k+ principal and interest according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ credit contract.

- Legal solutions:

In this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ borrower must continue to pay trực tiếp bóng đá k+ bank or credit institution trực tiếp bóng đá k+ unpaid principal and interest on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ due principal (if any); overdue interest on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ unpaid principal amount is at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ interest rate agreed upon by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract until this principal debt is completely paid. In case trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties have an agreement on adjusting trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lending interest rate from time to time by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lending bank or credit institution, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ interest rate that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ borrower must continue to pay according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court's decision will also be adjusted to suit trực tiếp bóng đá k+ interest rate adjustment of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lending bank or credit institution.

Based on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aforementioned guidelines, in this case, starting from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ day after trực tiếp bóng đá k+ date of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ trial, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ customer must continue to make payments to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Credit Institution for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ outstanding principal debt, accumulated interest on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ principal within trực tiếp bóng đá k+ term (if any) , and overdue interest on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ unpaid principal amount at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ interest rate agreed upon in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract until this principal debt is fully paid.

In trực tiếp bóng đá k+ event that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties have an agreement on adjusting trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lending interest rate from time to time by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lending bank or credit institution, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ interest rate that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ borrower must continue to pay according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court's decision will also be adjusted to suit trực tiếp bóng đá k+ interest rate adjustment of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lending bank or credit institution.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Articles 471, 474, and 476 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11;

- Clause 2, Article 91 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 47/2010/QH12 xoilac tv trực;

- Article 1 of Circular No.Circular No. 12/2010/TT-NHNNdated April 14, 2010 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State Bank guiding credit institutions on lending in Vietnam dong to customers at agreed interest rates;

- Clause 2, Article 11 of Credit Institutions' Lending Regulations to Customers were issued under Decision No.Quyết định 1627/2001/QĐ-NHNNdated December 31, 2001 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Governor of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State Bank, which was amended and supplemented by Decision No.Quyết định 127/2005/QĐ-NHNNdated February 3, 2005.

Question 33:House and land are trực tiếp bóng đá k+ common property of husband and wife, and one person dies first. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remaining person and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ heirs of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ deceased have agreed to divide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ division agreement does not violate trực tiếp bóng đá k+ rights of any heir. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ division of houses and land has been done in reality and has been adjusted on land documents. After trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remaining person dies, a dispute arises, do those who have been divided into real estate have trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to sue to request a division of inheritance?

Reply:

According to Precedent No.24/2018/AL, in this case, it must be determined that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land have been converted into trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal ownership and use rights of individuals. These people only have trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to sue to reclaim trực tiếp bóng đá k+ divided house or land that is being illegally possessed or used by others, but they do not have trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to request trực tiếp bóng đá k+ division of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inherited house and land.

Relevant legal provisions:

Articles 219, 223, and 226 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11correspond to Articles 213, 218, and 220 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13.

Question 34:trực tiếp bóng đá k+ individual signs a deposit contract to ensure trực tiếp bóng đá k+ conclusion of an agreed house purchase and sale contract within a certain period of time. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ deposit recipient must complete trực tiếp bóng đá k+ procedures to be granted a certificate of home ownership; if they are violated, they must pay a deposit. At trực tiếp bóng đá k+ end of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ agreed term, if trực tiếp bóng đá k+ deposit recipient has not been granted a certificate of home ownership due to reasons from a competent state agency, will trực tiếp bóng đá k+ deposit recipient lose trực tiếp bóng đá k+ deposit?

Reply:

According to Precedent No.25/2018/AL, in this case, it must be determined that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ deposit recipient's inability to comply with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ commitment is objective and that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ deposit recipient is not subject to a deposit penalty.

Relevant legal provisions:

Article 358 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11(corresponding to Article 328 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13.

Question 35: trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person leaving behind an inheritance of real estate died before trực tiếp bóng đá k+ announcement of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Inheritance Ordinance on August 30, 1990. At trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court of First Instance hears that Civil Code No.Law No. 91/2015/QH13is in effect, how is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time to start calculating trực tiếp bóng đá k+ statute of limitations and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ statute of limitations for requesting division of inheritance determined? ?

Reply:

According to Precedent No.26/2018/AL, in this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time to start calculating trực tiếp bóng đá k+ statute of limitations for requesting division of inheritance must be determined as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ date of announcement of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Inheritance Ordinance on August 30, 1990. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ statute of limitations for requesting division of inheritance is determined according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of Civil Code No. 91/2015/QH13.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Clause 1, Article 623 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13

- Clause 4, Article 36 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Inheritance Ordinance dated August 30, 1990.

Question 36:Is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to rent a house or buy a house owned by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State according to Decree No. 61/CP dated July 5, 1994 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Government on buying, selling, and trading houses a property right?

Reply:

According to Precedent No.31/2020/AL, individuals who are eligible to purchase state-owned residential houses under Government Decree No. 61/CP dated July 5, 1994, on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ sale and business of residential houses but have not completed trực tiếp bóng đá k+ procedures for purchasing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ houses at discounted prices during their lifetime, must establish trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to lease or purchase state-owned residential houses as property rights, which can be transferred to their heirs.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Articles 172, 188, and 634 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Code 1995 (corresponding to articles 163, 181, and 631 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11; articles 105, 115, 609 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13);

- Decree No. 61/CP dated July 5, 1994 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Government on housing purchase, sale and business.

Question 37:trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land was originally exploited by an individual but then settled abroad and was managed and used by others in a stable and long-term manner. During trực tiếp bóng đá k+ process of using trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land, this person improved trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land, built a stable house, registered, and was granted a land use right certificate. In this case, is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ individual who mined trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land still trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal land user of that cleared land?

Reply:

According to Precedent No.32/2020/AL, land was originally exploited by an individual but then settled abroad and was managed and used stably and long-term by others. During trực tiếp bóng đá k+ process of using trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land, this person improved trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land, built a stable house, registered, and was granted a land use right certificate. Therefore, in this case, it must be determined that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ individual who cleared trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land no longer has legal land use rights, so trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request to reclaim land use rights has no basis to be accepted.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Clause 2, Article 10, Clause 1, Clause 4 of Article 50 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Land Law 2003 (corresponding to Clause 5, Article 26, Clause 1, Clause 4, Article 100 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Land Law 2013);

- Clause 1, Article 164, Article 176, Clause 2, Article 177, Articles 192, 196, 201 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Code 1995 (corresponding to Clause 1, Article 155, Article 170, Clause 2, Article 171, Articles 185, 190, 195 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11; Clause 1, Article 150, Article 221, Clause 2, Article 237, Articles 187, 182, 192 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13).

Question 38:Individuals are allocated land by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State but do not use it but let others manage and use it stably and long-term. During trực tiếp bóng đá k+ process of using trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land, this person improved trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land, built stable housing, and registered to declare land use rights without trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land grantee having any comments. In this case, does trực tiếp bóng đá k+ individual who is allocated land have trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to reclaim trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property?

Reply:

According to Precedent No.33/2020/AL, individuals are granted land by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State but do not use it but they let others manage and use it stably and long-term from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land is allocated. During trực tiếp bóng đá k+ process of using trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land, this person improved trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land, built stable housing, and registered to declare land use rights without trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land grantee having any comments. In this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court does not accept trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request to reclaim land use rights.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Articles 176, 192, and 196 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Code 1995 (corresponding to articles 170, 185, and 190 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11; articles 221, 187, and 182 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13);

- Article 184 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13.

Question 39:Can Vietnamese people residing abroad reclaim trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to use agricultural land that was allocated to people in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ country for use before settling abroad?

Reply:

According to Precedent No.35/2020/AL, taking effect on April 15, 2020, Vietnamese people, before settling abroad, handed over agricultural land to people in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ country to use; People living in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ country have used that land stably and long-term and have been granted a land use right certificate. In this case, it must be determined that people in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ country have legal land use rights. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court will not accept trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request to reclaim land use rights.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Section 3, Part III, Section 3, Part V, Decision No.Quyết định 201-HĐCP/QĐdated July 1, 1980 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Government Council on unifying land management and strengthening land management throughout trực tiếp bóng đá k+ country;

- Article 14 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Land Law 1987; Article 26 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Land Law 1993; Clause 11, Article 38, Article 50 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Land Law 2003 (corresponding to Point h, Clause 1, Article 64; and Article 100 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Land Law 2013).

 3. Answering questions related to Administrative Precedents in Vietnam:

Question 40:If trực tiếp bóng đá k+ accusatory challenges an administrative decision that does not accept trực tiếp bóng đá k+ claim for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ recovery of land and property that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State has managed and allocated during trực tiếp bóng đá k+ implementation of land management policies and socialist renovation policies related to land before July 1, 1991, as regulated in Resolution No.Resolution Nodated November 26, 2003, by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ National Assembly, and if trực tiếp bóng đá k+ decision was issued with proper jurisdiction, content, and procedural sequence, can trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court accept and resolve trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case?

Reply:

According to Precedent No.27/2019/AL, this case must be accepted by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court to resolve in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ direction of rejecting trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lawsuit request if trực tiếp bóng đá k+ decision has been issued with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ correct authority, content, and procedure.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Article 94 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Luật Tổ chức Hội đồng xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube và Ủy ban xem bóng đá trực tiếp;

- Article 7 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 02/2011/QH13 lịch;

- Clause 1, Article 28, Point a, Clause 2, Article 163 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on Administrative Procedures 2010 (corresponding to Clause 1, Article 30, Point a, Clause 2, Article 193 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on Administrative Procedures 2015);

Clause 1, Article 28, Point a, Clause 2, Article 163 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on Administrative Procedures 2010 (corresponding to Clause 1, Article 30, Point a, Clause 2, Article 193 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on Administrative Procedures 2015);

- Article 1 of Resolution No.xem bóng đá trựcdated November 26, 2003 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ National Assembly on real estate managed and arranged for use by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Statein trực tiếp bóng đá k+ process of implementing real estate management policies and socialist renovation policies before July 1, 1991;

- Article 5 of Resolution No.Nghị quyết số 755/2005/NQ-UBTVQH11dated April 2, 2005 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ National Assembly Standing Committee stipulates trực tiếp bóng đá k+ resolution for some specific cases of real estate in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ process of implementing real estate management policies and socialist renovation policies before July 1, 1991;

- Clause 1, Article 4, Decree No. 127/ND-CP dated October 10, 2005 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Government guiding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ implementation of Resolution No. 23/2003/QH11 dated November 26, 2003 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ National Assembly.

Reply:

- Precedent No.10/2016/ALon administrative decisions that are trực tiếp bóng đá k+ subject of an administrative lawsuit provides trực tiếp bóng đá k+ following instructions:.

“Precedent situation:

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ decision approving trực tiếp bóng đá k+ support and resettlement plan of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Provincial People's Committee contains references to other documents that directly impact trực tiếp bóng đá k+ rights and interests of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff.

Legal solution:

In this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ content of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ referenced document belongs to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ administrative decision, and that administrative decision is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ subject of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ administrative lawsuit." In this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ content of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ referenced document belongs to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ administrative decision, and that administrative decision is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ subject of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ administrative lawsuit.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Clause 1, Article 3 and Clause 1, Article 28 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on Administrative Procedures 2010 (corresponding to Clause 1, Article 3, and Clause 1, Article 30 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on Administrative Procedures 2015);

- Articles 41 and 42 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Land Law 2003;

- Decree No. 197/ND-CP dated December 3, 2004 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Government on compensation, support, and resettlement when trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State recovers land;

- Decree No.Nghị định 69/2009/NĐ-CPdated August 13, 2009 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Government providing additional regulations on land use planning, land prices, land recovery, compensation, support, and resettlement.

 4. Answering questions related to Commercial Business Precedents in Vietnam:

Question 42:Do consumers have trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to sue in Vietnamese court if trực tiếp bóng đá k+ form contract has an arbitration agreement?

Reply:

According to Precedent No.42/2021/AL, taking effect on April 15, 2021, in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ form of a contract signed with consumers, there is a provision for selecting a foreign arbitrator to resolve disputes. When a dispute occurs, consumers sue in a Vietnamese court. In this case, it must be determined that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ consumer does not choose arbitration and has trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to choose trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Vietnamese Court to resolve trực tiếp bóng đá k+ matter.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Article 38 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No.59/2010/QH12 bóng đá hôm nay trực;

- Article 17 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 54/2010/QH12 bóng đá hôm nay;

- Clause 3, Article 26, Clause 1, Article 35 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Procedure Code 2015;

- Clause 5, Article 4 of Resolution No.Nghị quyết 01/2014/NQ-HĐTPdated March 20, 2014 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People's Court guiding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ implementation of a number of provisions of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on Commercial Arbitration.

Question 43:trực tiếp bóng đá k+ goods purchase and sale contract between trực tiếp bóng đá k+ two companies is violated because trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller does not deliver or does not deliver enough goods to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer, leading to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller's obligation to repay trực tiếp bóng đá k+ advance payment and interest due to late payment. In this case, how does trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court determine interest due to late payment?

Reply:

Precedent No.09/2016/ALprovides instructions as follows:

“- Precedent situation:

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ goods purchase contract is violated because trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller does not deliver or does not deliver enough goods to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer, resulting in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller being obliged to refund trực tiếp bóng đá k+ advance payment and interest due to late payment.

- Legal solutions:

In this case, interest due to late payment is calculated according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ average overdue debt interest rate on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ market equal to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ average overdue debt interest rate of at least three local banks at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of payment (first instance trial), unless otherwise agreed or otherwise prescribed by law.”

In Article 11 of Resolution No.Nghị quyết 01/2019/NQ-HĐTPdated January 11, 2019 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People's Court, guiding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ application of a number of legal provisions on interest, interest rates, and penalties for violations, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ instructions are as follows:

“In cases where trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract is governed by Article 306 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Commercial Law 2005, whendetermining trực tiếp bóng đá k+ late payment interest rate for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ late payment amount, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court bases its decision on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ average overdue debt interest rate on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ market of at least 03 (three) commercial banks. (Joint Commercial Bank for Foreign Trade of Vietnam, Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Industry and Trade of Vietnam, Vietnam Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development,...) have headquarters, branches, or transaction offices in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ province or centrally run city where trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court is resolving or adjudicating at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of payment (time of first instance trial) to decide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ late payment interest rate, unless trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties agree otherwise or trực tiếp bóng đá k+ law has other provisions.”

Based on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above regulations, in this case, to determine interest due to late payment, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court will base trực tiếp bóng đá k+ average overdue debt interest rate on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ market of at least 03 (three) commercial banks. (Joint Commercial Bank for Foreign Trade of Vietnam, Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Industry and Trade of Vietnam, Vietnam Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development,...) have headquarters, branches, or transaction offices in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ province or centrally run city where trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court is resolving or adjudicating at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of payment (time of first instance trial) to decide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ late payment interest rate.”

Relevant legal provisions:

- Article 34, Article 37, Clause 3, Article 297, and 306 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Commercial Law 2005;

Question 44: trực tiếp bóng đá k+ goods purchase and sale contract between trực tiếp bóng đá k+ two companies creates an obligation to pay fines for violations and compensation for damages. In this case, will trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court accept your request to pay interest on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ fine and compensate for damages?

Reply:

- Precedent No. 09/2016/AL provides instructions as follows:

“- Precedent situation:

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ goods purchase and sale contract creates an obligation to pay fines for violations and compensation for damages.

- Legal solutions:

In this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person obliged to pay fines for violations or compensation for damages does not have to pay interest on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ amount of fines for violations or compensation for damages." Based on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above instructions, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court determines that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ party obligated to pay fines for violations and compensation for damages does not have to pay interest on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ amount of fines for violations or compensation for damages.

Relevant legal provisions:

- Articles 300, 301, 302, 307 Commercial Law 2005;

- Articles 307, 422 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11

Question 45:trực tiếp bóng đá k+ international goods sale contract has an agreement on payment method by letter of credit (L/C), an agreement to implement trực tiếp bóng đá k+ L/C according to international trade practices (Uniform Code of Practice for Documentary Credits 6th 2007 (UCP 600) of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ International Chamber of Commerce), and in accordance with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of Vietnamese law. If trực tiếp bóng đá k+ international goods sales contract that is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ basis of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ L/C is canceled, will trực tiếp bóng đá k+ L/C lose its payment validity?

Reply:

According to Precedent No.13/2017/AL, in this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court must determine that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ letter of credit (L/C) is not invalidated for payment due to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cancellation of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ international sale and purchase contract, which serves as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ basis for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ letter of credit (L/C).

Relevant legal provisions:

- Article 3 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 33/2005/QH11(corresponding to Article 5 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13);

- Decision No. 226/2002/QD-NHNN dated March 26, 2002 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State Bank on "Regulations on payment activities through payment service providers";

- Amendment to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ 6th Uniform Code of Practice for Documentary Credits 2007 (UCP 600) of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ International Chamber of Commerce.

 5. Answering questions related to Labor Precedents in Vietnam:

Question 46:trực tiếp bóng đá k+ employer has a job offer letter with content determining trực tiếp bóng đá k+ type of labor contract and probationary period. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ employee has been on probation according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ probationary period in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ job offer letter. At trực tiếp bóng đá k+ end of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ probationary period, if trực tiếp bóng đá k+ employee continues to work but trực tiếp bóng đá k+ employer and employee have no other agreement, have trực tiếp bóng đá k+ employee and employer established a labor contract?

Reply:

In this case, according to Precedent No.20/2018/AL, it must be determined that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ employee and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ employer have established a labor contract relationship.

Relevant legal provisions:

Article 26, Article 27, Article 28, and Article 29 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+trực tiếp bóng đá.

Key word: precedent | in Vietnam | Vietnam | answers | questions |

PleaseLoginto be able to download