Conditional donation contract trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay related judgments in Vietnam

Article 462 of Vietnam'strực tiếp bóng đástipulates the conditional donation of property as follows:

A giver may require a recipient to perform one or several civil obligations prior to or after the giving of a gift. The conditions for giving a gift must not contravene the law or social morals.

Where a recipient performs an obligation required to be performed as a condition to the giving of a gift trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay the giver fails to deliver the gift, the giver must pay for the obligation already performed by the recipient.

Where a recipient fails to perform an obligation required to be performed after the giving of a gift, the giver may reclaim the gift trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay demand compensation for damage.

Below is a summary of some judgments on dispute over contract for conditional property donation.

1. Judgment on dispute requesting cancellation of donation contract No.Bản án về

- Level of trial:Appellate

- Judicial body:Ho Chi Minh City People's Court

- Summary:Mr. L trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Mrs. V signed a contract to donate housing trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay residential land use rights with the intention of donating the house trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land to Ms. Nguyen Thi Kim D. Although the donation contract is notarized. The conditions are not shown, but in fact, both parties acknowledge that Ms. V donated the house trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land to Ms. D on the condition that Mr. L trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Ms. V give Ms. D's house the house above, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Ms. D buys another piece of land in Binh Duong to store it. house for Mr. L trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Mrs. V to live in (in the form of a house swap). But so far, Ms. D has not bought another house for Mr. L trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Mrs. V. Therefore, Ms. V filed a lawsuit requesting to cancel the contract of gifting the house trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay the land use right between her trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Mrs. D.

- Court's decision:Accepting the entire petition of Ms. Tran Thi Kim V; canceling the contract of gifting housing trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land use rights between Mr. Nguyen Van L, Ms. Tran Thi Kim V, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Ms. Nguyen Thi Kim D; forcing Ms. D to return Mr. L trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Ms. V the original Certificate of House Ownership trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Residential Land Use Right.

2. Judgment No.trực tiếp bóngdated September 22, 2020 on disputes over property recovery trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay partial cancellation of land use right transfer contracts

- Level of trial:Appellate

- Judicial body:People's Court of Tay Ninh province

- Summary:Mrs. T accepted Mr. Huynh Cong Th as the son of her younger brother for adoption so that Mr. Th could take care of him when he was old trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay marry him. Later, she will hand over all the property back to her husband trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay wife to inherit on the condition that he trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay she take care of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay support her. In 2016, she carried out the procedures to allocate an area of 12,245 m2 to Mr. Th trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Ms. H. After being granted the certificate of land use right by Mr. Th, Ms. H lacked attention trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay care for her, so Mrs. T requested her. Cancel part of the land use right transfer contract trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay ask Mr. Th trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Ms. H to return the land use right to her.

- Court's decision:accepting the petition of Ms. To Thi T against Mr. Huynh Cong Th trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Ms. Huynh Thi H.

3. Judgment No.Bản án 101/2019/DS-PTdated September 19, 2019 on dispute over contract for property donation

- Level of trial:Appellate

- Judicial body:People's Court of Binh Phuoc province

- Summary:Mr. Pham C made a "paper for land trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay houses" for his son, Mr. Pham Van L, with the content that Mr. C gave Mr. L land trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay houses trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay some items. At the same time, Mr. L must commit to being responsible for Mr. C in taking care of Mr. C. When he dies, he must join his brothers trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay sisters to take care of funerals trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay graves, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay take care of his grandparents' death anniversary every year. Mr. C is now suing to reclaim the land area of 296.3m2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay the property on the land that Mr. C is using because he believes that Mr. L trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Mrs. H mistreated trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay insulted him, often did not feed him, or cursed him. threatened loudly by the old man. On the anniversary of the death anniversary of Mrs. C's mother, Mr. trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Mrs. L trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Mrs. H did not celebrate the anniversary trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay cursed trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay insulted him in front of the neighbors trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay children in the house. When Mr. C was sick, the two of them did not take him to the doctor, cursing trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay insulting Mr. C. Mrs. H pointed at Mr. C's face trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay said, "From now on, my wife trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay I will not raise him anymore." Now, Mr. Pham C requested The court forced Mr. Pham Van L trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Ms. Nguyen Thi H to return the area of 296.3m2 of land.

- Court's decision:Not accepting the claim of plaintiff Pham C on the request to cancel a part of the contract for gifting the property to Mr. L. Accepting the lawsuit claim of Mr. Pham C about the claim of cancellation of the contract of property donation regarding Mr. Pham Van L's donation of the land use right of 296.3m2 to Ms. Nguyen Thi H.

4. Judgment No.Bản án 105/2019/DS-PTdated June 20, 2019 on the dispute over the conditional donation contract

- Level of trial:Appellate

- Judicial body:People's Court of An Giang province

- Summary:On March 26, 2018, Mrs. D1 matched him to Mrs. Ly Thi D. Mrs. D1 asked him to buy clothes, clothes, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay jewelry for Mrs. D in order to declare that he trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Mrs. D were living together, while Ms. D1 ensures that Ms. D accepts to live with him.He took Mrs. D to a gold shop to buy jewelry trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay went to buy 3 sets of clothes, which he delivered to Mrs. D, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay he gave Ms. D an amount of 500,000 VND. After that, Mr., Mrs. D, Mrs. D1, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Mr. Ut went to the restaurant at Chau Doc ferry to attend a party called the Declaration Ceremony. The cost of the party was 800,000 VND. The party ended, he drove Mrs. D to his house, but to the canal bridge (Chau Doc), Mrs. D went to Mrs. D's house to get a bicycle, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Ms. D hid. The total amount of jewelry trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay clothes he gave Mrs. D was worth 6,000,000 VND. Now, he asked Mrs. D to return him 6,000,000 VND trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay asked Mrs. D1 to pay him back for the cost of the proclamation party of 800,000 VND.

- Court's decision:not to accept Mr. Nguyen Van D's petition to sue Ms. Ly Thi D to pay VND 6,000,000 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Ms. Nguyen Thi D to pay VND 8,000,000.

5. Judgment No.trực tiếp bóngdated September 10, 2021 on the dispute over contract for conditional property donation

- Level of trial:Appellate

- Judicial body:People's Court of Lang Son province

- Summary:Due to a serious illness, Mrs. D thought she was going to die. At that time, Mrs. Tran Thi V, her biological sister, accepted that she would be responsible for taking care of her. When she dies, she will take care of her affairs, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Mrs. V will inherit her properties. On June 5, 2011, she wrote a Will witnessed by her siblings in the family with the following content: Mrs. D will give her sister Ms. Tran Thi V trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay her brother-in-law Mr. Duong Huu Th 01 (one ) space; 01 (one) garden plot number 312; map sheet 52, area 833m2; trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay some other properties. Mrs. V trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Mr. TH are responsible for taking care of the future work. If Mrs. D dies, she has to take care of the funeral. In January 2020, the two sides quarreled trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay cursed each other. Mrs. V had to build a window trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay a path, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay cut off the water for her to share, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay kicked her out of the house. She is asking Ms. Tran Thi V to return the properties to her so that she can go elsewhere trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay take care of her own life, including the proceeds from the sale of the house, land, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay other properties, for a total amount of 675,000 VND.

- Court's decision:Accepting the petition of plaintiff Ms. Tran Thi D. Making defendant Ms. Tran Thi V responsible for paying Ms. Tran Thi D VND 332,500,000.

Key word: contract in Vietnam | LUR in Vietnam | land use right in Vietnam | land use right transfer in Vietnam |

PleaseLoginto be able to download