05 Judgments applying Case Law 20/2018/AL on establishing employment contract relations after trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay probationary period expires in Vietnam

Hello, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Lawnet would like to answer your questions as follows:

1. Contents of Precedent No.20/2018/ALof Vietnam

“[2]Mr. Tran Cong T has worked at L Co., Ltd. according to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay job invitation letter dated August 20, 2013 which indicates “Type of employment contract: Fixed term (12 months or longer). Probation period: 02 months”. At trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay end of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay probation period (from September 09, 2013 to November 09, 2013), although Mr. T received no notice of result of his probation, he still continued doing his job. L Co., Ltd. thought that after 02-month probation period, Mr. T failed work requirements, so L Co., Ltd. decided to allow him to take an additional probation period of 01 month so as to facilitate him in fulfillment of his duties and have more time to make exact evaluation of his working capacity. However, there is no document proving trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay agreement on extension of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay probation period made between Mr. T and L Co., Ltd.

[3] Clause 1 Article 27 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Labour Code stipulates that "trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay probationary period of a holder of job title who is required to possess associate degree or higher shall not exceed 60 days”. According to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay written statement dated June 14, 2014, representative of L Co., Ltd. stated: “L Co., Ltd. thoroughly knows that if trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay employment contract is not yet concluded after trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay probation period (60 days), trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay employee is entitled to work as an official employee under an employment contract of 12-month term". Thus, representative of L Co., Ltd. has admitted that after trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay probation period, Mr. T became an official employee working under an employment contract of 12-month term. Actually, L Co., Ltd. has negotiated with Mr. T about trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay termination of employment contract on December 28, 2013, and no agreement reached through such negotiation. On December 29, 2013, General Director of L Co., Ltd. has issued a Decision No. 15/QDKL-2013 on unilateral termination of employment contract with Mr. T. For these reasons, it is a well-founded affirmation that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay relationship between Mr. T and L Co., Ltd. after trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay probation period is a contractual employment relationship."

2. Some judgments applying Precedent No. 20/2018/AL of Vietnam

Judgment on unilateral termination of labor contract No.Bản án về

- Level of trial:Appellate

- Judicial body:People's Court of Binh Duong province

- Quoted content:"In trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay fourth appeal, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant argued that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay plaintiff was still in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay probationary period and arbitrarily terminated trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay contract. Because, as analyzed in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay second and third appeals and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay reason given by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay company to terminate trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay labor contract with trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant, he did not meet trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay requirements of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay company's leaders. trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant said that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay plaintiff, still in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay probationary period, wanted to quit, so trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay company terminated trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay labor contract. This was not acknowledged by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay plaintiff; trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant also did not have any documents to prove it because of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay plaintiff's voluntary will; and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay witnesses confessed that they only heard trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay plaintiff say that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant let trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay plaintiff quit. trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance judgment based on Article 29 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Labor Code, and Precedent No. 20/2018/AL of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Supreme People's Court that forced Kubota Kusui Vietnam Company to pay compensation to Mr. P.K.V. for compensation under Article 42 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Labor Code is grounded."

Judgment on dispute claiming compensation for damage caused by unilateral termination of labor contract No.xem bóng đá trực

- Level of trial:Appellate

- Judicial body:Long An Province People's Court

- Quoted content:"Considering that, Company A cannot prove that on July 1, 2020, they assigned Mr. D a notice of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay end of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay probationary process, and at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay same time, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Company still paid Mr. D's salary until trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay end of July 25, 2020. Therefore, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first instance level determined that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Company assigned Mr. D trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay notice of termination of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay probationary process on July 24, 2020, was grounded. Thus, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay probationary period ends on July 4, 2020. However, Mr. D was still working until July 25, 2020, when trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay company let him quit. Therefore, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first instance level determined that July 5, 2020 is trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay date of entering into a 12-month labor contract according to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay provisions of Point b, Clause 1, Article 22, Clause 1, Article 29 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Labor Code; and Precedent No. 20/2018/AL was approved by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Supreme People's Court on October 17, 2018 on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay establishment of labor relations after trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay probationary period expired.

JudgmentBản án 14/2020/LĐ-STdated September 30, 2020 on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay dispute of unilateral termination of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay labor contract

- Level of trial:First instance

- Judicial body:Go Vap District People's Court, Ho Chi Minh City

- Quoted content:"Mrs. Pham Thi Mai P has worked at TH Company since mid-April 2019 according to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay job offer letter dated April 24, 2019. In trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay content of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay invitation, Mr. T suggested to Mrs. P that after 3 months, when he has overcome trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay initial difficult period and has a business result, he will evaluate and review trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay salary and recommend a salary commensurate with Ms. P's capacity and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay company's situation. After 03 months from trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay date of receiving trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay job, Ms. P continues to work at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Company and receives a full salary. Pursuant to Precedent No. 20/2018/AL approved by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Supreme People's Court on October 17, 2018, and published under Decision No. 269/QD-CA dated November 6, 2018 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Supreme People's Court, Chief Justice of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Supreme People's Court, Ms. P has finished her 3-month working period, and Mrs. P continues to work; there is no other agreement between Ms. P and TH Company, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel has grounds to determine that between TH Company and Ms. P has been established an employment contract relationship."

JudgmentBản án 886/2019/LĐ-PTdated October 9, 2019 on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay dispute of unilateral termination of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay labor contract

- Level of trial:Appellate

- Judicial body:Ho Chi Minh City People's Court

- Quoted content:"During trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay labor contract negotiation, in addition to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay details that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay company deliberately took him 30 km down to C. trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay company also stated in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay contract draft that an employee of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay department he managed, Mr. Nguyen Hong Giang, whom trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay company had asked him to discipline before, managed and operated his direct work, i.e., as department director instead of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay chairman of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Board of Directors. After finishing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay probationary period, he still worked normally at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay address of District G for more than 01 month, which is trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay basis for establishing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay working location of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay official labor contract. Therefore, based on Articles 26, 27, 28, 29 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Labor Code; and Precedent No. 20/2018/AL, which was approved by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Supreme People's Court on January 17, 2018 and published under Decision No. 269/QD-CA dated November 6, 2018 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Chief Justice of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Supreme People's Court, requesting trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel to reject trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant's appeal and accept trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay plaintiff's entire appeal, forcing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant to pay trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay plaintiff."

Judgment Bản ádated January 28, 2021 on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay dispute of unilateral termination of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay labor contract

- Level of trial:Appellate

- Judicial body:People's Court of Ba Ria - Vung Tau province

- Quoted content:"Mr. B thinks that after signing a probationary contract twice, if he has not signed a labor contract, it must be determined that Mr. B is officially allowed to work under a definite-term contract of 12 months as trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Precedent No. 20/2018/AL stipulating on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay establishment of a labor contract after trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay probationary period expires, it is unfounded, because, as Mr. B confirms: After trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay probationary period expired, Mr. B received a notice of probation results on June 15, 2019, informing him that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay content did not meet trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay job requirements and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay probation results were unsatisfactory, so trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay company did not sign a labor contract with Mr. B. Compared with trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay relevant regulations in Decision No. 127/VIR dated July 25, 2013 on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay establishment of departments and professional divisions of V International Tourism Joint Stock Company; and Notice No. 100/VIR dated July 5, 2015, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Head of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Reception Department signed trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Certificate of probation results in accordance with trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay authority. Mr. B stated that he did not accept trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay notice of probation results, saying that Mr. Huynh Ngoc S, Head of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Front Desk Department of V International Tourism Joint Stock Company, did not have trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay authority to sign trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Certificate of probation results, and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay person authorized to sign trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay employment contract is groundless."

Best regards!

PleaseLoginto be able to download