trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nayVerdict No. 23/2019/HS-ST dated april 16, 2019 on obtaining property by fraud

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay PEOPLE’S COURT OF DONG HOI CITY, QUANG BINH PROVINCE

VERDICT NO. 23/2019/HS-ST DATED APRIL 16, 2019 ON OBTAINING PROPERTY BY FRAUD

On April 16, 2019, at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay head office of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People’s Court of Dong Hoi City, a first instance trial is conducted to hear trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay criminal case No. 06/2019/TLST-HS dated January 11, 2019 under trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Decision to Bring trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Case to Trial No. 07/2019/QDXXST-HS dated January 11, 2019; under trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Decision to adjourn trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay hearing for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay second time No. 04/2019/HSST-QD dated March 27, 2019 against:

Phan Dinh C; born in June 26, 1976 in: Nghe An. Current place of residence: Village 4, Commune BT, District YT, Nghe An Province; occupation: Business; educational level: 7/12; ethnicity: Kinh: gender: Female; religion: None; nationality: Vietnam; father: Phan Thanh C (dead), mother: Nguyen Thi A, born in: 1955; occupation: farmer; 4 siblings, C is trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay biggest child; wife: Vu Thi T, born in 1975; occupation: farmer; 3 children, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay biggest child was born in 1995, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay youngest child was born in 2009. Record: Raised by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay family, quit studying at grade 7 and has lived in Nghe An. In 2001, he joined a guest worker program to Russia, returned home in 2008. In November 2015, he established trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay CVB single-member limited liability company (hereinafter referred to as Company CVB) and has held trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay position of Director of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay company. On September 24, 2018, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Police Investigation Body of YT district, Nghe An province prosecuted trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case, prosecuted trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay accused for "Obtain property by fraud", and then forwarded trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Police Investigation Body of Nghe An province for investigation within their competence. Previous convictions, previous administrative violations: None. trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay accused has been currently detained associated with another case at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Nghe An Provincial Police Detention Center.

* Aggrieved parties:

1. Mr. Hoang Ngoc L, born on October 6, 1969; address: Sub-zone 2, DL town, TH district, Quang Binh province; present.

2. Ms. Nguyen Thi H, born on September 8, 1969; address: Sub-Area 2, DL town, TH district, Quang Binh province; present.

3. Mr. Nguyen Thanh C, born on December 20, 1965; address: Neighborhood PQ, farm town VT, BT district, Quang Binh province; present.

4. Mr. Ho Huu N, born on May 10, 1979; address: Sub-area 5, QH town, QN district, Quang Binh province, present.

5. Mr. Hoang Ngoc T, born on December 20, 1951; address: Sub-zone 1, DL town, TH district, Quang Binh province; absent.

6. Mr. Luu Duc T, born on December 13, 1965; address: QT village, TT commune, BT district, Quang Binh province; present.

- Person with interests and obligations related to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case:

1. Mr. Nguyen trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay H, born on November 20, 1989; address: hamlet 4, commune LN, city H, Quang Binh province; absent.

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay CASE

According to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay documents available in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case file and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay progress at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay contents of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case are summarized as follows:

Phan Dinh Chinh is trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Director of Company CVB with its head office in hamlet 4, BT commune, YT district, Nghe An province. CVB Company has trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay business lines following trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay business registration at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Department of Planning and Investment of Nghe An province: Activities of centers, consulting agencies of job placement and brokerage; travel agency; tour operator; support services related to tourism promotion and organization; supply of temporary labor; supply and management of labor resources (supply and management of domestic labor sources; supply and management of labor sources to work abroad). On December 1, 2016, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Company was granted a certificate of registration of operation of its representative office by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Department of Planning and Investment of Quang Binh province in hamlet 4, LN commune, H city, Quang Binh province, with Nguyen trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay H as trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay head of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay representative office.

Although CVB Company was not licensed by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ministry of Labor, War Invalids and Social Affairs to provide services to send people to work abroad and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Company did not have any documents or contracts associated with any organization entitled to send workers to work abroad. During trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay time when trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Department of Planning and Investment of Quang Binh Province did not issue trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay certificate of operation registration of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay company's representative office in Quang Binh province, Phan Dinh C met many people, gave false information that Chinh's company may send people to work abroad to cheat to appropriate trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay deposits of 05 people, in particular:

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first time: In September 2016, Mr. Hoang Ngoc L and his wife, Nguyen Thi H, entered Phan Dinh C's company office in City H. Chinh introduced that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Company was launching a guest worker program to Korea, under trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay collaboration between trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ministry of Labor, War Invalids and Social Affairs of Vietnam and Ministry of Labor of Korea.Chinh guaranteed that they would be sent to Korea to work for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay price of USD 16,000. On October 24, 2016, Mr. Hoang Ngoc L paid a deposit of VND 55,000,000 for C to carry out procedures to bring his son Hoang Ngoc H to work in Korea. Ms. H transferred VND 16,000,000 to C to cover trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay paperwork. On December 26, 2016, C wrote a receipt of deposit in full of VND 71,000,000, and promised that Mr. H would be sent abroad to work before April 2017. In June 2017, Chinh helped H to take trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay exam in Da Nang but it ended up that H was not on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay list and Chinh appropriated such VND 71,000,000. Mr. Hoang Ngoc L requests C to compensate VND 71,000,000.

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay second time: In October 2016, Phan Dinh C promised that Mr. Nguyen Thanh C will carry out procedures to send Mr. C’s daughter, Ms. Nguyen Thi Ngoc H, to work in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Federal Republic of D Nguyen Thi Ngoc H. On November 23, 2016, Chinh received trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay labor export dossier and pledged that until January 15, 2017, Ms. H would be able to be sent abroad to work at a total cost of USD 17,000.Chinh wrote a receipt and actually received a deposit of VND 22,000,000. In due time, Chinh continued to promise that on March 1, 2017, Ms. Huyen would be certainly sent abroad but that promise was broken and he appropriated such money for personal use. Mr. Nguyen Thanh C asks C to pay VND 22,000,000.

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay third time: In October 2016, Phan Dinh C promised with Mr. Ho Huu N that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay company was having a contract of foreign worker program to Republic S. On November 14, 2016, Chinh received trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay application, wrote a receipt and drafted a labor export contract to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Republic S for Mr. N for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay price of VND 18,000, by May 14, 2017 Mr. Ni would be allowed to leave trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay country and he received a deposit of USD 1,000 (equivalent to 22,067,000 VND). From December 2016 to May 2017, C continued to promise but did not keep it and appropriated trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay deposit amount of Mr. N. Mr. N asks C to pay trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay amount of VND 22,067,000.

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay fourth time: In November 2016, through trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay introduction of his younger brother, Hoang Ngoc L, Mr. Hoang Ngoc T asked Mr. L to bring his son, Hoang Ngoc T, to meet C at CVB Representative Office in LNi Commune, DH to complete trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay paperwork to work in Singapore. On December 26, 2016, Chinh wrote trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay commitment and deposit receipt of VND 15,000,000 paid by T, promising to bring him to Singapore to work for a cost of USD 6,000, but in January 2017 he did not keep his promise and then appropriated money for personal use. Mr. Hoang Ngoc T demands compensation of VND 15,000,000 from C.

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay fifth time: In January 2017, Mr. Luu Duc T in BT district, Quang Binh province was introduced by Phan Dinh C as trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Director of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Company capable of sending workers to work in some countries. Believing in C's introduction, in February 2017, Mr. T handed Nguyen trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay H - Chief of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay representative office, in 2 times, deposit of 3,000 USD (equivalent to VND 66,637,500) and wrote a commitment to complete paperwork to send Mr. Toai’s son, Luu Duc A, to Korea for working at a total cost of USD 11,000. H gave USD 3,000 and documents to C. After promising to help A to pass trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Korean language exam but failing to do so, C returned trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay amount of VND 12,000,000 to Mr. T, and appropriated VND 54,637,500. Mr. T asks C to compensate for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay amount of VND 54,637,500.

After appropriating trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay amount of VND 184,704,500, C escaped from Quang Binh. trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Investigation Security Agency of Quang Binh Province issued a search notice. On October 4, 2018, Chinh was arrested and detained by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Police Investigation Body of YT district, Nghe An province on charge of "Obtain property by fraud" in Nghe An province.

During investigation process, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay investigation body seized commitments; receipts provided by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay aggrieved parties and kept them in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case files. trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Expertise Conclusion No. 289 dated April 1, 2018 and No. 399 dated April 24, 2018 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminalistics Department of Quang Binh Police Department concluded that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay words on commitments, receipts of money, paper receipts and stamps on seized documents are written, signed by Phan Dinh C as trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay representative of Company CVB, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay seals stamped on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay documents are trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay same.

In trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Charging Document No. 08/CT-VKSĐH-KT dated January 9, 2019, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People's Procuracy of Dong Hoi city prosecuted Phan Dinh C to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People's Court of Dong Hoi City for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay crime of "Obtain property by fraud" as prescribed at Point e, Clause 2, Article 139 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay 1999 Penal Code.

At trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay representative of Dong Hoi City People's Procuracy spoke arraignment, demonstrated and analyzed trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay nature of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay extent of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay offense committed by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant. Uphold trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay prosecution decision, request trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel to judge Phan Dinh C following trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay entire trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Charging Document and consider aggravating and mitigating circumstances for penal liability: Propose trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel:

To apply Point e, Clause 2 of Article 139; Point p, Clause 1, Article 46; sub-point 1, Point g, Clause 1, Article 48, Article 33 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Code 1999 to sentence Phan Dinh C to from 4 to 5 years in prison.

* Regarding civil liability:

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay aggrieved parties claim compensation of property that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant defrauded but not yet returned. Pursuant to Article 42 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Code 1999, Articles 584, 585, and 589 oftrực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay 2015 Civil Code in Viet Nam, force Phan Dinh C to pay damages to aggrieved parties, in particular: VND 71,000,000 for Hoang Ngoc L, VND 22,000,000 for Nguyen Thanh C, VND 22,067,000 for Ho Huu N, VND 15,000,000 for Hoang Ngoc T, VND 54,637,500 for Luu Duc T.

- Criminal court fee, first instance civil court fee:Pursuant to Article 136 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nayCriminal Procedure Code 2015 in Viet Nam; Article 21, 23 ofNghị quyết 326/2016/UBTVQH14 quy định về mứcdated December 30, 2016 on court fees and charges, exemption, reduction, management and use thereof, Section I, II of schedule of court charges and fees: Phan Dinh C has to pay such fee as prescribed.

During trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay interrogation at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial, Phan Dinh C admitted all of his crimes in accordance with trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Charging Document and requested trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial panel to consider reducing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay penalty for him.

Based on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay evidence and documents verified at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial; trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay results of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay oral argument at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay basis of fully and comprehensively examining evidences and opinions of procurators, defendant, defense lawyer, aggrieved parties.

JUDGEMENT OF trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay COURT

Based on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay contents of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case and documents available in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case file that have been litigated at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel shall determine as follows:

[1] Regarding trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay procedural acts and decisions of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay investigation body of Dong Hoi Police, Investigators, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People’s Procuracy of Dong Hoi city and Procurators in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay course of investigation and prosecution, they have complied with procedures and taken actions intra vires as prescribed by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Procedure Code. In trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay course of investigation and at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant and other participants in legal proceedings do not have any opinion or complaint about trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay procedure and decision of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay presiding agencies and presiding officers.

[2] Phan Dinh C claimed to commit trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay crime in accordance with trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Charging Document as prosecuted and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant's testimony at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay investigation body. trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant's confession is consistent with statements of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay aggrieved parties, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay persons with related rights and obligations, and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay offense progress. trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel has sufficient grounds to determine:

From October 2016 to February 2017 in city H, Phan Dinh C with trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trick of setting up a company's representative office in Quang Binh, giving false information about trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay possibility of sending people to work abroad in order to defraud 05 people of VND 184,704,500. Therefore, Phan Dinh Ch shall be criminally responsible for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay crime of "Obtain property by fraud" stipulated at Point e, Clause 2, Article 139 oftrực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Code 1999 in Viet Nam, just as trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Procurator Office prosecuted.

[3] Considering trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay nature, extent of consequences of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay acts, aggravating and mitigating circumstances and record of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant, it is noted that:

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant's offense has directly infringed upon trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay property rights of another person protected by law, affected trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay work of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay victims, caused disturbance of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay peace in city H, and caused confusion in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay people. Defendant C is an adult, has social awareness, and has health to work to support himself and his family. But by nature that he likes to benefit from trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay labor of others without having to work. and he was fully aware of his actions against trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay law but he still disregarded trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay consequences. trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant committed trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay offense with intentional errors, causing bad public clamor among trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay people, requiring strict penalty for addressing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant' criminal acts. Therefore, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant must be strictly judged to isolate him from society for a while so that he can recognize his mistake and rectify it.

However, after deliberation, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel also considers that: trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant also expressed cooperative attitude and showed his repentance and desire to redeem his faults during trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay investigation process and at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial. Therefore, it is advisable to apply Point p, Clause 1, Article 46 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Code 1999 to partially reduce trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay penalty for Phan Dinh C.

In trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case, Nguyen trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay H is trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay head of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay representative office of CVB Company in Quang Binh province. During that time, Hieu only carried out procedures, received applications and did not know trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defraudment purpose of Phan Dinh C, so he was not considered criminal liability.

4] Regarding civil liability: trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay aggrieved parties claim compensation of property that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant defrauded but not yet returned. trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial panel finds that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay aggrieved parties’ requests are completely legal and compliant with trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay provisions of law. Pursuant to Article 42 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Code 1999, Articles 584, 585, and 589 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay 2015 Civil Code, Phan Dinh C is forced to pay damages to aggrieved parties, in particular: VND 71,000,000 for Hoang Ngoc L, VND 22,000,000 for Nguyen Thanh C, VND 22,067,000 for Ho Huu N, VND 15,000,000 for Hoang Ngoc T, VND 54,637,500 for Luu Duc T.

[5] Regarding first instance criminal fee: Pursuant to Article 136 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Procedure Code 2015; Article 21, 23 of Resolution No. 326/2016/UBTVQH14 dated December 30, 2016 on court fees and charges, exemption, reduction, management and use thereof:

Phan Dinh Chinh has to pay VND 200,000 to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay state fund. Therefore,

HEREBY DECIDE

1. Regarding count of crime:

Declare: Phan Dinh C is guilty of “Obtain property by fraud”.

2. Regarding applicable law:Point e, Clause 2 of Article 139; Point p, Clause 1, Article 46; sub-point 1, Point g, Clause 1, Article 48, Article 33 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Code 1999

3. Regarding penalty:

Sentence Phan Dinh C to 4 years in prison. trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay prison term commences from trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay date of detention for sentence execution.

4. Regarding civil liability:

Pursuant to Article 42 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Code 1999, Articles 584, 585, and 589 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay 2015 Civil Code, force Phan Dinh C to pay damages to aggrieved parties, in particular:

VND 71,000,000 for Hoang Ngoc L, VND 22,000,000 for Nguyen Thanh C, VND 22,067,000 for Ho Huu N, VND 15,000,000 for Hoang Ngoc T, VND 54,637,500 for Luu Duc T. In total, Phan Dinh C must pay damages to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay aggrieved parties totaling VND 184,704,500.

5. Regarding first instance criminal fee:

Pursuant to Article 136 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Procedure Code 2015; Article 21, 23 of Resolution No. 326/2016/UBTVQH14 dated December 30, 2016 on court fees and charges, exemption, reduction, management and use thereof:

Phan Dinh Chinh has to pay VND 200,000 to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay state fund.

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first instance civil court fee payable by Phan Dinh C is VND 9,255,225. From trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay effective date of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay verdict (for cases where trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay verdict execution agencies have trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay right to take initiative in verdict execution) or from trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay date on which trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay verdict creditor makes a request for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay verdict execution (for money to be paid to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay verdict debtor) until trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay verdict execution is complete, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay verdict debtors must bear trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay interest of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay remaining verdict amount every month with trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay interest rate prescribed in Clause 2, Article 468 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Civil Code 2015.

In case trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay verdict or court decision is enforced as per regulations in Article 2 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Law on enforcements of civil verdicts 6, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay verdict creditor and verdict debtor are lawfully allowed to reach an agreement on verdict enforcement, request verdict enforcement, be subject to voluntary execution or coercive verdict enforcement in compliance with regulations in Article 7, 9 and 30 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Law on enforcement of civil verdicts. trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay effective period of verdict enforcement shall comply within provisions in Article 30 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nayLuật thi đá bóng trực tiếp dân sự 2008 Số hiệu 26/2008/QH12.

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant and aggrieved parties present at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial have trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay right to appeal this verdict within 15 days from trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay date of first instance verdict (April 16, 2019). Those who are absent from trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial have trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay right to appeal against trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay verdict within 15 days from trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay date on which trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay copy of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay verdict is received or duly served.