trực tiếp bóng đá k+Judgment no. 222/2021/DSPT dated 27/04/2021 on Inheritance Dispute 

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ HIGH PEOPLE’S COURT IN HO CHI MINH CITY

JUDGMENT NO. 222/2021/DSPT DATED APRIL 27, 2021 ON INHERITANCE DISPUTE

Because an appeal against trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance judgment No. 722/2019/DS-ST dated June 28, 2019 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Ho Chi Minh City has been made, on April 27, 2021, an appellate trial has been conducted at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ High People’s Court in Ho Chi Minh City to hear in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ public trực tiếp bóng đá k+ handled case No. 410/2020/TLPT-DS dated August 05, 2020 regarding “inheritance dispute” according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Decision to bring trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate trial No. 3673/2020/QDPT-DS  dated October 05, 2020, between trực tiếp bóng đá k+ following persons concerned:

1. Plaintiff:Mrs. Nguyen Tiet P, born in 1945;

Residence:  No. 40, Street No. 8, Quarter 7, Ward B, District B, Ho Chi Minh City.

Lawful representative (according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Power of attorney dated August 19, 2013): Mrs. Nguyen Thi Kim Ngan; residence:833/1A, Street K, Quarter 2, Ward L, District T, Ho Chi Minh City (present at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ trial).

2. Defendant:Mrs. Nguyen Tiet H, born in 1943;

Residence:  No. 212/30A, Nguyen Van Ng Street, Ward T, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City.Lawful representative (according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Power of attorney dated August 27, 2013):Mr. Nguyen Canh T, born in 1994(present at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ trial).

Address: No. 298, Street D, Ward 10, District 4, Ho Chi Minh City.

3. Persons with related interests and duties in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lawsuit:

1- Mr. Nguyen Minh M, (born in1947, deceased on July 10, 2020 according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Death Certificate No. 581/TLKT-BS dated July 13, 2020 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of Ward T); Persons inheriting procedural rights and obligations: Mr. Nguyen Tiet Minh H and Mrs. Nguyen Tiet H, born in 1943;

Joint residence:  No. 212/30A, Street N, Ward T, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City.

2- Mr. Nguyen Tiet Minh H,born in 1975;

Residence:  No. 212/30A, Street N, Ward T, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City.

3- Mrs. Nguyen Tiet H, (born in 1935, deceased on November 05, 2015); Persons inheriting procedural rights and obligations:

3-1.Mr. Le Van Khanh H, born in 1960;

3-2. Mrs. Le Van Thu O, born in1962;

3-3. Mrs. Le Van Thu P, born in 1963;

Joint residence:  No. 85, Street N, Ward 5, District B, Ho Chi Minh City.

3-4. Mrs. Le Van Thu Nga (Le,Nga Van Thu), born in 1967;

Residence:  17703 Emerald Garden LN Houston TX77084-3957, USA

4-Mr. Nguyen Tiet H; Residence:G3-8, Street No. 10, Ward P, District C, Can Tho City;Lawful representative (according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Power of attorney dated August 27, 2013):Mrs. Nguyen Thi Kim N; residence:833/1A, Street K, Quarter 2, Ward L, District T, Ho Chi Minh City.

5- Mr. Nguyen Tiet H, born in 1947, deceased on August 18, 2017; Persons inheriting procedural rights and obligations:

5-1. Mrs. Nguyen Thi N, born in 1944;

5-2.Mrs. Nguyen Tiet Nguyet H, born in 1968;

5-3. Mrs. Nguyen Tiet Nguyet T, born in 1970;

5-4.Mr. Nguyen Tiet V, born in 1973;

Joint residence:  No. 86 (former No. 78B), Street 30/4, Town S, Soc Trang Province.

Authorized representative of Mrs. N, Mrs. H, Mrs. T and Mr. V:Mrs. Nguyen Thi Kim Ng; residence: 833/1A, Street K, Quarter 2, Ward L, District T, Ho Chi Minh City. (acting as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ authorized representative according to 04 Powers of attorney dated January 23, 2018).

5-5. Mrs. Nguyen Tiet Nguyet D(Nguyet-D Tiet Nguyen), born in 1975;

Residence:  1210S Sulllivan St Santa Ana CA, 92704, USA;Lawful representative:Mrs. Nguyen Thi Kim N; residence: 833/1A, Street K, Quarter 2, Ward L, District T, Ho Chi Minh City. (acting as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ authorized representative according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Power of attorney dated March 02, 2018).

6- Mr. Nguyen Tiet H, born in 1939;

Residence:  6 Sente du Noyer 78480 Verneuil/Seine, France.

Lawful representative:Mrs. Nguyen Thi Kim N; residence: 833/1A, Street K, Quarter 2, Ward L, District T, Ho Chi Minh City (acting as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ authorized representative according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Power of attorney dated September 12, 2013).

7- Mr. Nguyen Tiet Q, born in 1947;

Residence:  1920 Peeler Rd-Salisbury NC 28146, USA;Lawful representative (according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Power of attorney dated September 12, 2013):Mrs. Nguyen Thi Kim N; residence: 833/1A, Street K, Quarter 2, Ward L, District T, Ho Chi Minh City.

Appellant:trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant – Mrs. Nguyen Tiet H

CONTENTS OF trực tiếp bóng đá k+ CASE

According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ petition dated November 23, 2012 and during trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case resolution, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff, Mrs. Nguyen Tiet P, through her representative, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Kim N, stated:

Mrs. P requests Mr. Nguyen Minh M and Mr. Nguyen Tiet Minh H who are staying in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 212/30A, Street NN (former name: NC), Ward T, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, to return this house to her family.

According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ petition dated July 05, 2013, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ additional petition dated July 10, 2013 and during trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case resolution, Mrs. Nguyen Tiet P, through her authorized representative, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Kim N, stated:

Mrs. Phuc’s father is Mr. Nguyen Van Q, born in 1896, deceased in 1985 and her mother is Mrs. Tiet Thi L, born in 1906, deceased in 1976. Mr. Q and Mrs. L have 07 children, including: Nguyen Tiet H, Nguyen Tiet H2, Nguyen Tiet H3, Nguyen Tiet H4, Nguyen Tiet H5, Nguyen Tiet P and Nguyen Tiet Q. When they were still alive, Mrs. P's parents were trực tiếp bóng đá k+ owners of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 212/30A, Street NN, Ward T, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ definitive purchase agreement dated October 22, 1980 of Saigon Notary Office with registration fees paid. Since 1985, when Mr. Q died, Mrs. Nguyen Tiet H who is one of co-heirs has been managing and using trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said house till now. Currently, Mrs. H is leasing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and prevents Mrs. P's siblings from living in this house.

Mrs. Nguyen Tiet H1 died on November 05, 2015 and her husband has died before Mrs. H1's death. Thus, her first degree of consanguinity includes Mr. Le Van Khanh H, born in 1960, Mrs. Le Van Thu Oa, born in 1962, Mrs. Le Van Thu P, born in 1963 and Mrs. Le Van Thu N (Le, N Van Thu), born in 1967 (Mrs. N is residing in USA).

Mr. Nguyen Tiet H5 died on August 18, 2017, and his first-degree of consanguinity includes his wife, Mrs. Nguyen Thi N and his children, including Mrs. Nguyen Tiet Nguyet H, Mrs. Nguyen Tiet Nguyet T, Mr. Nguyen Tiet V and Mrs. Nguyen Tiet Nguyet D (Nguyet-D Tiet Nguyen) (Mrs. D is residing in USA).

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ area of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot on which trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house is located is 49,7m2 and is smaller than that specified in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ definitive purchase agreement because, when he was still alive, Mr. Q and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ owner of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ opposite house have agreed to use a part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land area (about 20m2) as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ shared lane between two houses. Current conditions of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot are described in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ current condition & location map and house drawing dated May 12, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Survey and Mapping Center affiliated to Department of Natural Resources and Environment of Ho Chi Minh City. Now, current conditions of house and land are kept unchanged. Mrs. P confirms that she only requests trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court to make judgment on division of inheritance which is house and land described in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ current condition & location map and house drawing dated May 12, 2016.

According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ valuation report No. 163.01/2019/CT-BDS dated March 31, 2019 of Thuong Tin Commercial Appraisal Joint Stock Company, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 212/30A, Street NN, Ward T, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, is VND 6.547.000.000.

For trực tiếp bóng đá k+ purposes of prompt termination of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case and facilitating trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court’s judgment in case of disagreement between trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house’s value, Mrs. P requests trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court to make judgment on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ following matters:

- Division of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance left by Mr. Nguyen Van Q and Mrs. Tiet Thi L, which is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 212/30A, Street NN, Ward T, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, to their co-heirs as prescribed by laws. Mrs. Nguyen Tiet P claims 1/7 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house's value which is determined at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ specific time of judgment enforcement.

- Mrs. P withdraws her petition requesting Mr. Nguyen Minh M and Mr. Nguyen Tiet Minh Ho who are staying in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 212/30A, Street NN, Ward T, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, to return this house to her family.

According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ statement of opinions dated December 23, 2013, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant, Mrs. Nguyen Tiet H, stated:

She refuses trực tiếp bóng đá k+ entire request of Mrs. Nguyen Tiet P with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ following reasons:

- trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 212/30A, Street NN, Ward T, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property established and left by her parents. Her parents are Mr. Nguyen Van Q, deceased in 1985, and Mrs. Tiet Thi L, deceased in 1976. Thus, her parents died over 30 years ago. Now, Mrs. Nguyen Tiet P files a petition for inheritance which is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above-mentioned house while trực tiếp bóng đá k+ prescriptive period for filing petition in this case as prescribed by laws has expired.

- She is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ only one who has been managing, repairing, continuously using and fulfilling obligations regarding this house over trực tiếp bóng đá k+ last 30 years since her parents passed away.

- She confirms that her parents have seven children. Some of them have soon left their family to earn their living, some of them have immigrated to foreign countries and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ others did not live with parents although they have been living in Vietnam. Especially, Mrs. Nguyen Tiet P has illegally immigrated in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ 1980s but failed. Mrs. H is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ only one in charge of caring their parents. Because of her filial piety and responsibilities towards to her parents, in 1982, Mrs. H’s father has made a testament to leave trực tiếp bóng đá k+ entire house to her. Then, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, has issued trực tiếp bóng đá k+ License No. 83/GPUB dated February 09, 1983 certifying Mrs. H’s ownership of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house.

With trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above reasons, Mrs. H requests trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court to issue a reasonable decision to protect her legitimate rights.

During trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case resolution, persons with relevant rights and benefits, including Mr. Nguyen Tiet H2 and Mr. Nguyen Tiet H3, through their authorized representative, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Kim N, stated: Mr. H2 and Mr. H3 have unanimously agreed to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ statement and petition of Mrs. P. According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance donation agreement dated June 04, 2013 of Mr. Nguyen Tiet H2 and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance donation agreement dated October 28, 2013 of Mr. Nguyen Tiet H3, Mr. H2 and Mr. H3 have unanimously agreed to donate their shares of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance which is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 212/30A, Street NN, Ward T, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, to Mrs. Nguyen Tiet P. When both of them died, Mrs. P shall entirely inherit their shares of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance. They do not donate their shares of inheritance to anybody other than Mrs. P.

During trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case resolution, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person with relevant rights and benefits, Mr. Nguyen Tiet Q, and persons inheriting procedural rights and obligations from Mr. Nguyen Tiet H4, including Mr./Mrs. Nguyen Thi N, Nguyen Tiet Nguyet H, Nguyen Tiet Nguyet T, Nguyen Tiet V, Nguyen Tiet Nguyet D (Nguyet-D Tiet Nguyen), through their authorized representative, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Kim N, stated: they have unanimously agreed to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ statement and petition of Mrs. P.

During trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case resolution, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ persons with relevant rights and benefits, including Mr./Mrs. Nguyen Minh M and Nguyen Tiet Minh H, and persons inheriting procedural rights and obligations from Mrs. Nguyen Tiet H5, including Mr./Mrs. Le Van Khanh H, Le Van Thu O, Le Van Thu P and Le Van Thu N (Le, N Van Thu), have been lawfully summoned by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court but all are absent from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ trial without giving their statements.

According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance civil judgment No. 722/2019/DS-ST dated June 28, 2019, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Ho Chi Minh City has judged:

1/- trực tiếp bóng đá k+ petition of Mrs. Nguyen Tiet P requesting Mr. Nguyen Minh M and Mr. Nguyen Tiet Minh H who are staying in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 212/30A, Street NN, Ward T, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, to return this house to her is suspended.

2/- trực tiếp bóng đá k+ petition of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff, Mrs. Nguyen Tiet P, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ persons whose names appear hereunder are entitled to receive their shares of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance which is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 212/30A, Nguyen Van N Street, Tan D Ward, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, when this house is sold and after having fully paid judgment enforcement fees. To be specific:

+ Mrs. Nguyen Tiet P shall receive 1/7 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 212/30A, Street NN, Ward T, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, determined at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of judgment enforcement.
+ Mrs. Nguyen Tiet H shall receive 1/7 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said house determined at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of judgment enforcement.

+ trực tiếp bóng đá k+ following persons, including Le Van Khanh H, Le Van Thu O, Le Van Thu P, Le Van Thu N (Le, N Van Thu), shall receive 1/7 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said house determined at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of judgment enforcement.
+ Mr. Nguyen Tiet Hong shall receive 1/7 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said house determined at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of judgment enforcement.
+ trực tiếp bóng đá k+ following persons, including Nguyen Thi N, Nguyen Tiet Nguyet H, Nguyen Tiet Nguyet T, Nguyen Tiet V and Nguyen Tiet Nguyet D (Nguyet-D Tiet Nguyen) shall receive 1/7 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said house determined at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of judgment enforcement.
+ Mr. Nguyen Tiet H3 shall receive 1/7 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said house determined at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of judgment enforcement.
+ Mr. Nguyen Tiet Q shall receive 1/7 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said house determined at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of judgment enforcement.

3/- trực tiếp bóng đá k+ following persons, including Nguyen Tiet P, Nguyen Tiet H1, (Nguyen Thi N, Nguyen Tiet Nguyet H, Nguyen Tiet Nguyet T, Nguyen Tiet V and Nguyen Tiet Nguyet D (Nguyet-D Tiet Nguyen)), Nguyen Tiet H1 and Nguyen Tiet Q, shall jointly make a payment of VND 50.000.000 (fifty million) to Mrs. Nguyen Tiet H for her management of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 212/30A, Street NN, Ward T, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City.

Additionally, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court’s judgment also contains decisions on appraisal costs, judicial entrustment service charges, and first-instance civil court fees, judgment enforcement, and rights to make appeal of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ persons concerned.

On August 05, 2019, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant, Nguyen Tiet H, has made an appeal against trực tiếp bóng đá k+ entire first-instance judgment. According to her appeal, Mrs. H has requested trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court to amend trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance judgment with 3 specific requests as follows: Recognize trực tiếp bóng đá k+ validity of Mr. Q’s testament to divide a half of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house to Mrs. H and 1/7 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ second half of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house which is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ share of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance divided to Mrs. L; claim an amount of VND 300.000.000 for her management of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and give her priority to buy trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house when it is sold; apply for exemption from paying trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court fees because she is an elderly person.

At trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ authorized representative of Mrs. H requests trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court to cancel trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance judgment because it has been issued inconsistently with laws. To be specific: trực tiếp bóng đá k+ owner of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ shared lane failed to attending trực tiếp bóng đá k+ trial because trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land area of Mr./Mrs. Q and L is more than 60m2 instead of 44m2 as specified in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ drawing and survey report; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ relevant district failed to participate in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ proceedings; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ validity of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ testament could not be verified; Mrs. H’s management of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house was not put into due consideration; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appraisal result is invalid because of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ absence of Mrs. H during trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appraisal.   In case trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel refuses to accept trực tiếp bóng đá k+ petition for judgment cancellation, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court is requested to accept Mrs. H’s requests specified in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ authorized representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff and persons with relevant rights and benefits who are co-heirs in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case request trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court to keep trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance judgment unchanged because trực tiếp bóng đá k+ testament presented by Mrs. H is invalid and Mrs. H has kicked her siblings out of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and appropriated trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house for her personal use. Her siblings must live in leased houses while Mrs. H and her husband still have another house for rent. With regard to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ shared lane mentioned by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ trial, when Mr. Q was still alive, he has reached an agreement with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ owner of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ opposite house on such shared lane which has been stably used for a long term. Thus, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance should be determined according to current conditions of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house which has been actually surveyed and appraised.

Opinions given by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Procuracy: regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court procedures, both first-instance and appellate courts have strictly complied with regulations; regarding contents of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case, according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ documentary evidences collected during trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case resolution and statements of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ persons concerned, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance judgment is well-grounded and lawful; regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant’s rights to make appeal, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel is requested, pursuant to Clause 2 Article 308 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Code of Civil Procedures, to amend trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance judgment with a view to accepting trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request for consideration of management fee paid to Mrs. H because trực tiếp bóng đá k+ management fee of VND 50.000.000 is not rational and suitable for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance. According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ precedent No. 05/2016/AL, a share of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance should be divided to Mrs. H as remuneration for her management of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house before dividing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance to other co-heirs. Additionally, Mrs. Hanh should be granted exemption from paying trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court fee because she is an elderly person.

JUDGMENT OF trực tiếp bóng đá k+ COURT

Based on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contents of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case, documents in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case file which have been examined and argued at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ trial, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ trial panel finds that:

[1] Regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court procedures:  During trực tiếp bóng đá k+ proceedings, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance court has complied with regulations when determining trực tiếp bóng đá k+ status of persons attending trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lawsuit, disclosure of evidences, conciliation procedures and appraisal of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property in dispute.

However, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ firs-instance court has failed to comply with regulations on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case resolution time limit, appeal time limit, failed to issue a decision on change of Judge and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court Clerk, failed to issue a decision to continue handling trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case after trực tiếp bóng đá k+ reason for suspension of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case which is violation against trực tiếp bóng đá k+ code of civil procedures has been clarified, and thus caused trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case prolonged without legitimate reasons. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ nature of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case is not affected by these violations which are specified herein for experience-learning purpose.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance court has suspended its judgment on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+  petition which has been withdrawn by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff during trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case handling process. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court's action is deemed to comply with Article 5 and Article 244 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Code of Civil Procedures.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance court’s refusal to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ complaint submitted by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant’s authorized representative about appraisal procedures is well-grounded because trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appraisal procedures have been conducted in accordance with regulations for use as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ basis for calculation of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court fees. Additionally, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff also requests trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court to divide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of judgment enforcement. Thus, there is no mistakes during trực tiếp bóng đá k+ conduct of these procedures.

[2] Regarding contents of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case:

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff has petitioned for division of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance left by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parents of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ persons concerned but trực tiếp bóng đá k+ petition has been refused by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant. Thus, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance court has determined trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal relationship in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance dispute and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case falls under trực tiếp bóng đá k+ jurisdiction of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Ho Chi Minh City in accordance with regulations.

Regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ prescriptive period:  Mrs. Tiet Thi L died in 1976, Mr. Nguyen Van Q died in 1985, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff has submitted a petition on November 23, 2012 which is still within trực tiếp bóng đá k+ prescriptive period.

Based on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ –petition, collected documentary evidences, statements provided by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ persons concerned and actual verification results, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance judgment has determined legal relationship, degrees of consanguinity, inheritance and detailed judgments in conformity with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ civil procedures and current conditions of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land in dispute. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ complaint filed by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ authorized representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant about trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house area and lack of persons participating in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lawsuit is ungrounded.

Based  on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ collected evidences about trực tiếp bóng đá k+ use of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property in dispute, it is well-grounded to determine that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property in dispute is established and used by Mr. Nguyen Van Q and Mrs. Tiet Thi L until they passed away.  Mrs. Nguyen Tiet H lived with Mr. Q and Mrs. L, and has been directly managing and using trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property. Her husband and son are Mr. Nguyen Minh M and Mr. Nguyen Tiet Minh H. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ evidences submitted by Mrs. Hanh on her parents’ donation of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property to her are implausible.   Mrs. H’s family also has another house for living. Thus, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ division of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance left by Mr. Q and Mrs. L to their heirs, determination that each co-heir shall be entitled to 1/7 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house when it is sold at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of judgment enforcement, and acknowledgement of voluntary payment of VND 50.000.000 by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ co-heirs to Mrs. Hanh for her management of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house specified in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance judgment are conformable with laws.

Hence, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance court has reasonable grounds for accepting trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff's petition.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance court’s decisions on procedural costs and court fees have been issued in accordance with laws.

[3] Regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal:

Whereas, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant has filed an appeal against trực tiếp bóng đá k+ entire judgment and at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate trial, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ authorized representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant has requested trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court to cancel trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance judgment because it has been issued against trực tiếp bóng đá k+ code of civil procedures but failed to provide any new evidences thereon. According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ stated analysis, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ disputed matters between trực tiếp bóng đá k+ persons concerned have been adequately, exactly and lawfully handled by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance court. Thus, there are no grounds for accepting Mrs. H’s appeal in which she requests trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court to divide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance according to her father’s testament under which she is entitled to a half of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house’s value and 1/7 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ second half of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house, and give her trực tiếp bóng đá k+ priority to buy trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house.

There are no grounds for accepting trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request for cancellation of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance judgment of Mrs. H’s authorized representative.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel finds that there is well-grounded for accepting trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contents of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal concerning trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court fees and remuneration for Mrs. H’s management of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance because Mrs. H is above 60 years of age and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remuneration for Mrs. H’s management of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance decided in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance judgment is not suitable for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance’s value and her management period. According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Precedent No. 05/2016/AL, in which only trực tiếp bóng đá k+ payment for inheritance management is mentioned without a specific amount, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel accepts to increase trực tiếp bóng đá k+ payment amount to VND 300.000.000 as requested by Mrs. H without considering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance's value as requested by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Procuracy’s representative.

[4] After trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance trial, Mr. Nguyen Minh M died on July 10, 2020 (according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Death Certificate No. 581/TLKT-BS dated July 13, 2020 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of Ward T). According to certification given by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Police Agency of Ward T, District 1, only Mrs. Nguyen Tiet H and Mr. Nguyen Tiet Minh H are living in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 212/30A, Street NN, Ward T, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City. Thus, Mrs. H and Mr. H are required to return trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of judgment enforcement.

[5] Mrs. Nguyen Tiet H is exempt from paying trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court fees because she is an elderly person. For trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said reasons;

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ COURT DECIDES

Pursuant to Clause 2 Article 308 and Article 309 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Code of Civil Procedures;

1. To accept a part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal filed by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant, Mrs. Nguyen Tiet H, and amend a part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance judgment No. 722/2019/DS-ST dated June 28, 2019 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Ho Chi Minh City.

Pursuant to:

Articles 26, 34, 68, 157, 164, 200, 227, 228, 266, 273 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Code of Civil Procedures; Articles 158, 163, 164, 175  of trực tiếp bóng đá k+trực tiếp bóng đá k+; Articles 97, 106 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+trực tiếp bóng đá, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Resolution No.Nghị quyết 326/2016/UBTVQH14dated December 30, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Standing Committee of National Assembly prescribing court fees and charges, collection, exemption, reduction, transfer, management and use thereof.

Judged:

- trực tiếp bóng đá k+ petition of Mrs. Nguyen Tiet P requesting Mr. Nguyen Minh M and Mr. Nguyen Tiet Minh H who are staying in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 212/30A, Street NN, Ward T, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, to return this house to her is suspended.

- trực tiếp bóng đá k+ petition of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff, Mrs. Nguyen Tiet P, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ persons whose names appear hereunder are entitled to receive their shares of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance which is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 212/30A, Street NN, Ward T, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, when this house is liquidated and after having fully paid judgment enforcement fees. To be specific:

+ Mrs. Nguyen Tiet P shall receive 1/7 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 212/30A, Street NN, Ward T, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, determined at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of judgment enforcement.

+ Mrs. Nguyen Tiet H shall receive 1/7 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said house determined at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of judgment enforcement.

+ trực tiếp bóng đá k+ following persons, including Le Van Khanh H, Le Van Thu O, Le Van Thu P, Le Van Thu N (Le, N Van Thu), shall receive 1/7 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said house determined at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of judgment enforcement.

+ Mrs. Nguyen Tiet H shall receive 1/7 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said house determined at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of judgment enforcement.

+ trực tiếp bóng đá k+ following persons, including Nguyen Thi N, Nguyen Tiet Nguyet H, Nguyen Tiet Nguyet T, Nguyen Tiet V and Nguyen Tiet Nguyet D (Nguyet-D Tiet Nguyen) shall receive 1/7 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said house determined at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of judgment enforcement.

+ Mrs. Nguyen Tiet H3 shall receive 1/7 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said house determined at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of judgment enforcement.

+ Mrs. Nguyen Tiet Q shall receive 1/7 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said house determined at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of judgment enforcement.

- trực tiếp bóng đá k+ following persons, including Nguyen Tiet P, Nguyen Tiet H3, (Nguyen Thi N, Nguyen Tiet Nguyet H, Nguyen Tiet Nguyet T, Nguyen Tiet V and Nguyen Tiet Nguyet D (Nguyet-D Tiet Nguyen)), Nguyen Tiet H2 and Nguyen Tiet Q, shall jointly make a payment of VND 300.000.000(three hundred million) to Mrs. Nguyen Tiet H for her management of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance.

- Mrs. Nguyen Tiet H and Mr. Nguyen Tiet Minh H are forced to return trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 212/30A, Street NN, Ward T, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of judgment enforcement.

2. Mrs. Nguyen Tiet H is exempt from paying trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance and appellate civil court fees; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ amount of VND 300.000 paid under receipt No. 0024332 dated August 27, 2019 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Judgment Enforcement Division of Ho Chi Minh City shall be returned to Mrs. H.

3. Other decisions specified in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance judgment against which there is no appeal shall take legal effect from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ end of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ prescribed appeal time limit.

In case trực tiếp bóng đá k+ judgment or decision is enforced according to Article 2 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on civil judgment enforcement, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ judgment creditor and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ judgment debtor are lawfully allowed to reach an agreement on judgment enforcement, request judgment enforcement, be subject to voluntary execution or coercive judgment enforcement in compliance with regulations in Articles 6, 7 and 9 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on civil judgment enforcement, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ effective period of judgment enforcement shall comply within provisions in Article 30 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Luật thi đá bóng trực tiếp dân sự.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ judgment of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court comes into force from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ date on which it is pronounced