xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2Judgment No. 16/2017/HNGD-ST dated September 25, 2017 on divorce

PEOPLE’S COURT OF THAI NGUYEN PROVINCE

JUDGMENT NO. 16/2017/HNGD-ST DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 ON DIVORCE

On September 95 2017, xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 first instance trial court was conducted at xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 office of People’s Court of Thai Nguyen Province to hear xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 case No. 16/2017/TLST-HNGD dated August 17, 2017 regarding divorce dispute according to xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Decision to Bring xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Case to Trial No. 28/2017/QDXX-ST dated September 19, 2017 between xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 following litigants:

1. Petitioner:Mrs. H - born in 1976;

residing in: Village D, Commune H, Town P, Thai Nguyen Province.

2. Respondent:Mr. K - born in 1955;

residing in: No. 760 50TH AVE, EAST VENCOUVER BC . V5X IB3 CANADA.

(Mrs. H is present, Mr. K is absent, Mr. K submitted a Request for Trial in Absentia dated September 8, 2017)

xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 CASE

Representation of Mrs. H in xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 petition for divorce dated August 7, 2017 and xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 self-declaration dated August 21, 2017 and at xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 court hearing:

She and Mr. K got married in 2007 on xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 voluntary basis, they registered marriage at xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 People’s Committee of Thai Nguyen Province, Vietnam.

After wedding, they had lived together for more than one month. Because Mr. K had business abroad, he returned to Canada. At first, they kept regular contact with each other through phone calls, but because of geographical distance, their emotional bond became more distant. Since Mr. K returned to Canada, he has never returned to Vietnam, they have separated since 2007. Now, she deems that their marital bond breaks and marriage is not happy, their conflicts become more serious, so she asks for divorce from Mr. K.

With reference to common children: None.

With reference to common property and liabilities: None.

In xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 request filed with xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 People’s Court of Thai Nguyen Province, Vietnam dated September 8, 2017, he confirms xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 wedding time, marital status, common children and properties, liabilities as stated as Mrs. H. Now, he determines that he will stay in Canada, and Mrs. H will live in Vietnam, they have lived apart and their marital bond breaks. He agrees to xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 divorce from Mrs. H.

Currently, because of business in Canada, he cannot return to Vietnam to participate in xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 case in person. He made a request for absence in all working sessions and xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 trial of xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Court.

JUDGEMENT OF xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 COURT

After considering documents available in xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 case file and hearing xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 representation of Mrs. H and opinions of representative of xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 People’s Procuracy of province, xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Trial Panel considers as follows:

[1]In terms of court procedures: In this case, xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 respondent’s nationality is Canada, currently residing and working in Canada, stating in xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 marriage certificate, passport and xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 certificate of residence of Mr. K certified by Steven Le notary of British Columbia Province and authenticated by xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Office of Justice of City T - Thai Nguyen Province - Vietnam. Therefore, this is a divorce case involving foreign elements falling under jurisdiction of xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 People’s Court of Thai Nguyen Province as prescribed in Article 37 ofxem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Civil Procedure Code 2015 in Viet Nam.

During xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 lawsuit settlement, xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 respondent lives abroad and does not return to Vietnam to participate in xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 legal proceedings, pursuant to Article 207 of xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Civil Procedure Code 2015, xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Court cannot carry out reconciliation. xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 defendant received all court documents and filed a request with xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Court, raising opinions as to xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 case resolution and request xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Court to try in his absence, pursuant to Clause 1 Article 228, Clause 5 Article 477 of xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Civil Procedure Code 2015, xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Court conducts xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 trial in absence of xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 respondent as per xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 law.

[2]With reference to content:xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 marriage between Mrs. H and Mr. K is established on voluntary basis, they registered marriage at xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 People’s Committee of Thai Nguyen Province, Vietnam. It is considered a legal marriage protected by law.

After wedding, they had lived together for more than one month and had little time of each other. Because Mr. K had business abroad, he returned to Canada. At first, they kept regular contact with each other through phone calls, but because of geographical distance, their emotional bond became more distant. Since Mr. K returned to Canada, he has never returned to Vietnam, they have separated since 2007. Now, she deems that their marital bond breaks and marriage is not happy, their conflicts become more serious, so she asks for divorce from Mr. K. Mr. K sent a document to xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Court, showing his consent to divorce.

Thus, there are substantial grounds to determine that xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 marital conflicts between Mrs. H and Mr. K became serious, they have not fulfilled their obligations to love and care each other. He agrees to xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 divorce filed by Mrs. H. At xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 court hearing, Mrs. H upholds her petition for divorce, so, granting her a divorce from Mr. K is deemed conformable to Article 56 of xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Law on Marriage and Family of Vietnam.

With reference to common children: They both confirm that they have no common children. With reference to common property and liabilities: None.

At xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 court hearing, xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 representative of xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 People’s Procuracy offers opinions that xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Judge - xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 chair of court hearing and Trial Panel have complied with laws and regulations; in terms of guidelines to resolve xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 case, request xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Trial Panel to accept xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 petition for divorce of Mrs. H and grant her xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 divorce. No common children, properties and liabilities, so xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Court does not settle it. Mrs. H has to pay a court fee as per xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 law. xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 request of xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 representative of xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 People’s Procuracy has substantial grounds to accept.

Pursuant to facts and matters mentioned above:

HEREBY DECIDES

Pursuant to:  Articles 28, 37, 40, 147, 207, Clause 1 Article 228 and Clause 5 Article 477 of xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Civil Procedure Code 2015; Article 56 oftrực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Hôn nhân và gia đình 2014 Số hiệu 52/2014/QH13; Clause 5 Article 27 ofNghị quyết 326/2016/UBTVQH14 quy định về mứcdated December 30, 2016 of xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Standing Committee of National Assembly on court fees and charges, remission, collection, payment, management and use thereof;

1. With reference to conjugal relationship: Mrs. H is granted divorce from Mr. K

2. With reference to common children: None.

3. With reference to common property: None.

4. With reference to common liability: None.

5. Court fees: Mrs. H has to pay VND 300,000 (Three hundred thousand dong) of first instance divorce court fee. Mrs. H is confirmed that she paid xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 first instance divorce court fee in full according to xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 receipt No. 0018442 dated August 17, 2017 of xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Department of Civil Judgment Enforcement of Thai Nguyen Province.

Mrs. H has right to appeal within 15 days from xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 pronouncement date, Mr. K has right to appeal within 15 days, from xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 date on which xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Judgment is received or posted up.