trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euroJudgment No. 1103/2018/DS-PT dated november 23, 2018 on dispute over a service contract

trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro PEOPLE’S COURT OF HO CHI MINH CITY

JUDGMENT NO. 1103/2018/DS-PT DATED NOVEMBER 23, 2018 ON DISPUTE OVER A SERVICE CONTRACT

On November 23, 2018 at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro courtroom, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City conducts an appeal trial of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro case No. 77/2018/TLPT-DS dated February 26, 2018 on "Dispute over service contract”.

As trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro first instance civil judgment No. 21/2018/DS-ST dated January 11, 2018 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro People's Court of District M is appealed.

According to Decision to bring trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro case to appellate trial No. 5197/2018/QDPT-DS dated November 5, 2018 between:

- Plaintiff:  Ms. Nguyen Thi T, born in 1958, residing at: Street B, Ward C, District D, Ho Chi Minh City.

Defender: Mr. Nguyen Van Q - Attorney at Lawyer Office N of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Ho Chi Minh City Bar Association; residing at: Street P, Ward R, District S, Ho Chi Minh City.

- Respondents:

1/ Mr. Nguyen Xuan C, born in 1947, residing at: Street K, Ward L, District M, Ho Chi Minh City.

2/ L Ltd, Co.; head office: Street K, Ward L, District M, Ho Chi Minh City.

Legal representative: Mr. Nguyen Xuan C, born in 1947, residing at: Street K, Ward L, District M, Ho Chi Minh City.

Defender: Mr. Do Bien T2 - Attorney of G Law Firm affiliated to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Ho Chi Minh City Bar Association; residing at: Street A, Ward O, District V, Ho Chi Minh City.

- Appellant:  Ms. Nguyen Thi T, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro plaintiff.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Representation of Ms. Nguyen Thi T in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro lawsuit petition, records of reconciliation and at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro first-instance court hearing:

With desire for beauty, she came to SG Aesthetic Hospital affiliated to H Co., Ltd. to seek aesthetic advice on eyelid surgery. Mr. Nguyen Xuan C persuaded her to have eyelid and facelift surgery; on February 21 and 22, 2011, Mr. C performed upper and lower eyelid surgery and facelift surgery for her.  After trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro surgery, her face was deformed, leaving a large scar, her vision was blurry, her eyelids were stiff and she had difficulty to open her eyes, so Mr. C operated her again.  After three facelift surgeries and two surgeries of upper and lower eyelids, her eyelids were completely damaged, her mouth was distorted, her teeth were dislodged, her earlobes lose an angle, leaving behind a symptom of 7^thnerve palsy. Mr. C performed acupoint injection therapy, electroacupuncture, injection of a kind of yellow drug directly in her face for trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro whole year but could not help. It shows that trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro cosmetic surgery failed; so she went to Hanoi for treatment twice at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro cost of VND 92,000,000, in specific: round-trip airfare was VND 12,000,000; food cost in Hanoi for 79 days of treatment was VND 79,000,000; trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro cost of medical examination in Saigon was VND 1,000,000.  After being treated, she made a complaint and was sent by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Inspector of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Health Department of Ho Chi Minh City for an assessment with trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro result of whole person impairment (WPI) of 8%.  She sued to request SG Aesthetic Hospital under H Co., Ltd. to pay her trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro amount of VND 92,000,000, compensate for mental damage caused by permanent impairment of 8%, to relieve trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro consequences of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro injury. Therefore, if she cannot be cured in Vietnam, they must pay for her overseas medical treatment expenses.

In trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro process of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Court's settlement, Ms. T filed an additional lawsuit, changing trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro petition, requesting Mr. Nguyen Xuan C and H Co., Ltd. to compensate her with an amount of VND 1,122,747,000, including:  trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro cost to go to Hanoi for temporary repair is VND 92,000,000, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro cost for expert examination according to a court's decision is VND 1,247,000, a court cost of VND 27,500,000, a specialist expert examination fee of VND 2,000,000, an estimated cost for overseas eyelid implant is VND 200,000,000; trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro cost for injury impair such as mouth distortion, lost earlobe is VND 800,000,000.

Representation of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro respondents - H Co, Ltd. and Mr. Nguyen Xuan C:

trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro respondents confirmed that they performed eyelid and facelift surgeries for Ms. Nguyen Thi T; after that, Ms. T asked to further stretch her face and repair her upper eyelid so he performed second and third surgeries for Mrs. T. After three surgeries, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro scars were well healed and Mrs. T was very satisfied but then she went to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro hospital to cause trouble again. Because trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro hospital did not want Ms. T to make noise and affect trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro patient, it returned Ms. T trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro cost of surgery of VND 66,600,000.  According to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro assessment conclusion of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Center for Forensic Examination affiliated to Department of Health of Ho Chi Minh City, there is no basis to claim that trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro cosmetic surgery performed by SG Aesthetic Hospital to Mrs. T caused her 7^thnerve palsy and affected her eye performance; therefore, Company H and Mr. Nguyen Xuan C do not agree to compensate at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro request of Ms. T.

In trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro first instance civil judgment No. 21/2018/DS-ST dated January 11, 2018, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro People’s Court of district M held that:

Pursuant to Clause 3 Article 26, Point a Clause 1 Article 35, Point a Clause 1 Article 39, Article 220, Article 271 and Clause 1 Article 273 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euroCivil Procedure Code 2015; Article 518 and Article 519 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euroCivil Code 2005; Article 48 ofNghị quyết 326/2016/UBTVQH14 quydated December 30, 2016 of Standing Committee of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro National Assembly on trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro rates, exemption, reduction, collection, payment, management and use of court fees and fees; Article 5 and Clause 3 Article 27 ofPháp lệnh án phí, lệ phí đá bóng trực; trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euroLuật thi đá bóng trực tiếp dân sự.

Declare:

1. Reject trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro request of Ms. Nguyen Thi T demanding Company H and Mr. Nguyen Xuan C to compensate her for trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro sums of:  trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro cost to go to Hanoi for temporary repair is VND 92,000,000, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro cost for expert examination according to a court's decision is VND 1,247,000, a specialist expert examination fee of VND 2,000,000, an estimated cost for overseas eyelid implant of VND 200,000,000; trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro cost for injury impair such as mouth distortion, lost earlobe of VND 800,000,000, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro cost for facelift surgery and earlobe repair of VND 30.000.000.

2. Suspend trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro first instance trial of Ms. Nguyen Thi T's request to claim H Co, Ltd. and Mr. Nguyen Xuan C to reimburse trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro court fee of VND 27,500,000.

3. Ms. Nguyen Thi T is liable to first-instance civil court fee of VND 45,757,410; which is deducted from trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro court fee advance of VND 2,300,000 according to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro receipt No. 0004441 dated October 5, 2012 and 21,000,000 VND according to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro receipt No. 04453 dated December 27, 2013 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Sub-Department of enforcement of civil judgment of District 1, Ho Chi Minh City; so Ms. T also has to pay first-instance civil court fee of VND 22,457,410.

In addition, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro first instance judgment also states trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro right to appeal and trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro right to enforce trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro judgment of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro involved parties.  On January 23, 2018, plaintiff Ms. Nguyen Thi T filed an appeal against trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro entire first-instance judgment.

At trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro appellate court hearing:

Representation of attorney Nguyen Van Q, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro defender of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro plaintiff Nguyen Thi T:

Based on trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Forensic Examination Conclusion of Injury No. 99/18/TgT dated August 27, 2018 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro National Institute of Forensic Medicine - Sub-Institute in Ho Chi Minh City has determined that trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Hospital of Doctor C has caused harm to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro plaintiff in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro course of cosmetic surgery.  However, this Conclusion is still incomplete, so currently Ms. T requires additional examinations to determine how much her impairment rating is, what is trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro yellow liquid injected into trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro plaintiff's face. and recommend soliciting a specialist organization to determine trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro cost for corrective surgery. In addition, since trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro defendant requests to bring Hospital I into trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro proceedings as a person with related interests and obligations, it is recommended to quash trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro entire first-instance judgment, hand it over to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro first instance for re-settlement.

Representation of Ms. Nguyen Thi T, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro plaintiff:

Agree with trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro statement of Attorney Q. trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro conclusion dated August 27, 2018 is incomplete and subjective.  After Dr. C performed trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro bad cosmetic surgery, it caused many deformities to her face, and then she had to go to many places for treatment.  Specifically, she went to Hospital D in Hanoi for treatment and for acupressure, taking traditional medicine at a private facility in Hanoi.  She also went to Hospital I to facelift corrective surgery and earlobe repair; went to Thong Nhat Hospital to remove trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro tumor caused by pus in her cheeks after facelift surgery; went to Hospital X in Ho Chi Minh City to treat fungal infections caused by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro fluids that Dr. C injected into her face during trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro operation.

Representation of attorney Do Bien T2, defender of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro respondents:

Agree with trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro first instance judgment.  trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro forensic examination conclusion of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Center for Forensic Examination in Ho Chi Minh City is trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro exact ground for resolving trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro case.  trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro conclusion of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro National Forensic Institute - Sub-Institute in Ho Chi Minh City is inaccurate, subjective. In fact, on November 29, 2017, Ms. T went to Hospital I for facelift corrective surgery and earlobe repair, so trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro forensic examination conclusion dated August 27, 2018 cannot tell which surgery(ies) cause injuries in question. Mrs. T, after having facelift surgery at Hospital I, said that she was completely satisfied, so why is Mrs. T now presenting that her face is paralyzed.

trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro respondent side requests trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Court to adjourn trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro hearing to bring Hospital I into trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro proceedings as a person with related rights and obligations to clarify trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro above matters; as well as bring medical records at Hospital I to solicit assessment.  It is unnecessary to quash trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro first instance judgment as appealed by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro plaintiff.

Representation of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro respondents - H Co, Ltd. and Mr. Nguyen Xuan C:

Agree with trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro attorney's statement.  At today's trial, Ms. T cannot prove where she is paralyzed or where her mouth is distorted. Ms. T does not suffer peripheral facial palsy as stated in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro assessment conclusion dated August 27, 2018. Hospital I had an intervention so trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro assessment conclusion is not objective.

Opinions of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro representative of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro People's Procuracy of Ho Chi Minh City on trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro compliance with trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro law in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro process of resolving trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro case at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro appellate stage:

- Regarding legal proceedings: trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro judge and trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro trial panel have strictly complied with trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro provisions of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Civil Procedure Code, have ensured that involved parties have trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro rights and obligations as prescribed; sent adequate decisions, notifications to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Procuracy of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro same level and trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro involved parties in due time.  trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro trial panel is composed of competent persons, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro trial takes place in accordance with trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro order and trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro provisions of law.

- With reference to content: trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Procuracy finds just cause to determine that Hospital I is related to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro case, so Hospital I should participate in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro proceedings as a person with related rights and obligations to redefine trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro injuries of Ms. T to resolve trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro case in an objective and accurate manner.  trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Procuracy requests to quash trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro first instance judgment.

JUDGEMENT OF trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro COURT

After studying trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro documents contained in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro case files which have been verified at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro trial and based on trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro results of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro oral argument at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro trial, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro trial panel finds that:

[1] In trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro process of resolving trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro case at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro first instance, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro plaintiff Nguyen Thi T presented:  after having cosmetic surgery at SG Aesthetic Hospital under H Co., Ltd., she only went to Hanoi for treatment and corrective surgeries and request trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro respondents to compensate these costs.

At trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro first instance, according to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro forensic examination conclusion number: 36/SK.13 dated October 8, 2013, Official Dispatch No. 47/TTPY.GT-14 dated March 24, 2014 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Center for Forensic Examination affiliated to Ho Chi Minh City Department of Health on trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro explanation of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro injury assessment results of Ms. Nguyen Thi T and trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Official Dispatch No. 5306/SYT-NVY dated September 16, 2014 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Department of Health of Ho Chi Minh City: "Ms T's binocular vision are not affected and there are not enough grounds to determine that trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro surgery has a slight effect on trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro 7^thcranial nerve".  Based on this conclusion, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro first instance did not accept trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro whole petition of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro plaintiff.

At trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro appellate court, Mrs. T asks for a re-assessment and gives additional statement: after having cosmetic surgery at SG Aesthetic Hospital, she went to Hospital E, Hospital X, Ho Chi Minh City for treatment and went to Hospital I for facelift corrective surgery and earlobe repair. Ms. T has submitted copies of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro medical receipts at these hospitals to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Court.

trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro appellate court issued a decision to solicit re-assessment and at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro forensic examination conclusion on injury No. 99/18/TgT dated August 27, 2018 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro National Institute of Forensic Medicine - Sub-Institute in Ho Chi Minh City. HCM states:  “After eyelid and facelift surgeries at SG Hospital, there is now sequelae in both eyes and incomplete peripheral facial nerve palsy.  At trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro time of assessment of her traumatic sequelae in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro eye: incomplete peripheral facial nerve palsy; slight droopy eyelids on both sides, ability of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro eyelids to fully close slightly decrease”.

trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro appellate court also issued Decisions requiring Hospital E, Hospital X Ho Chi Minh City and Hospital I to provide Ms. T's medical records and determines that Ms. T had come to these hospitals for treatment after cosmetic surgery at SG Hospital.  trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro file of Hospital I shows that Ms. T has come to have facelift corrective surgery and earlobe repair and as a result, Ms. was satisfied after trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro surgery and has no complaints.

trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro trial panel finds that, according to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro re-assessment result, Ms. T now has sequelae in both eyes and incomplete peripheral facial nerve palsy after cosmetic surgery; however, Ms. T not only underwent trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro surgery at SG Hospital, but also in turn went to other hospitals for further treatment, in which receiving facelift surgery at Hospital I. Therefore, it is necessary to bring Hospital I into trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro proceedings as a person with related rights and obligations and collect all records at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro hospital to clearly identify if trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro consequences stated in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro assessment conclusion only come from trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro cosmetic surgery at SG Hospital or not.  In addition, it is also necessary to collect more evidence of Ms. T's medical examination and treatment at Hospital D in Hanoi to determine which hospital she went for examination, which treatment and how much it cost. These are new facts arising at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro appellate court hearing that cannot be taken, clarified or supplemented by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro appellate court.  Therefore, it is necessary to quash trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro first-instance judgment, transfer trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro case file to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Court of first instance for re-resolution.

Ms. T is not liable to a civil appeal fee. Therefore,

Pursuant to Article 3 and Article 308, Article 310 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Criminal Procedure Code;

DISPOSITION

Quash trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro first instance civil judgment No. 21/2018/DS-ST dated January 11, 2018 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro People’s Court of district M between:

- Plaintiff:  Ms. Nguyen Thi T, born in 1958, residing at: Street B, Ward C, District D, Ho Chi Minh City.

- Respondents:

1/ Mr. Nguyen Xuan C, born in 1947, residing at: Street K, Ward L, District M, Ho Chi Minh City.

2/ L Ltd, Co.; head office: Street K, Ward L, District M, Ho Chi Minh City.

Legal representative: Mr. Nguyen Xuan C, born in 1947, residing at: Street K, Ward L, District M, Ho Chi Minh City.

Refer trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro case file to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro People’s Court of district M, Ho Chi Minh City for re-resolution as per trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro law.

2. Regarding appellate civil fee: Ms. T is not liable to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro fee. Reimburse to Ms. L1 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro advance payment of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro appellate court fee of VND 300,000 according to receipt No.0022635, dated January 24, 2018 of Civil Judgment Execution Department of District M, Ho Chi Minh City.

trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro appellate judgment takes legal effect from trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro date of pronouncement./