xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nayJudgment no. 108/2017/KDTM-ST dated august 11, 2017 on dispute over logistics services contract

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay PEOPLE’S COURT OF TAN BINH DISTRICT OF HO CHI MINH CITY

JUDGMENT NO. 108/2017/KDTM-ST DATED AUGUST 11, 2017 ON DISPUTE OVER LOGISTICS SERVICES CONTRACT

On August 11, 2017, at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay office of People’s Court of Tan Binh District, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance trial was conducted to hear xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case No. 132/2016/TLST-KDTM dated November 16, 2016 on “Dispute over logistics services contract” according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Decision to Bring xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Case to Trial No. 88/2017/QĐXXST-KDTM dated July 27, 2017 between litigants:

- Petitioner:  T Distribution and Commerce Limited Liability Company, headquartered at: Floor M, Building A, 117-119 L, Ward X, District Y, Ho Chi Minh City.

Authorized legal representative of petitioner: Mrs. Do Thi T, born in 1961, address: 199 L, Ward X, District Y, Ho Chi Minh City (Letter of Authorization dated April 4, 2017) (Mrs. T is present).

- Respondent:  C Food Export and Import Limited Liability Company, headquartered at: 279-281 C, Ward X, District Y, Ho Chi Minh City.

Authorized legal representative of respondent: Mr. Nguyen Ba L, legal representative of C Food Export and Import Limited Liability Company (Company’s Director). (Mr. L is present).

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay CASE

Representation of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner’s representative Mr. Nguyen Thai B in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay lawsuit petition, deposition and meeting minutes of handover and publication of evidence and reconciliation:

In early July 2016, Mr. B - Director of T Distribution and Commerce Limited Liability Company  (hereinafter referred to as Company T) communicated with Mr. Nguyen Ba L - Director of C Food Export and Import Limited Liability Company (hereinafter referred to as Company C) asking Company C to import a consignment of soybeans on behalf of Company T from Company Y (hereinafter referred to as Company S) from Thailand to Vietnam. Through xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay phone call, Mr. L promised to check xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Company in Thailand and complete customs paperwork to take xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay consignment. Believing xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay promise of Mr. L, Company T entered into a Logistics Services Contract No. 127/2016-UTNK dated July 12, 2016 with Company C. Mr. B reached arrangements on goods, quantity, price with Company S in Thailand, then Company C concluded a Sales Contract with Company S (Thailand) to import xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay consignment of soybeans worth USD 2,700 to Vietnam. Mr. B came to Company C to transfer money 2 times, first time: 35% of contract value, equivalent to VND 22,288,000, second time: 65% of contract value, equivalent to VND 39, 312,000. In total, Company T transferred Company C VND 60,485,000 but Company T has not received goods from Company S (Thailand) so far. As stated by Mr. B, Company C did not check xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay eligibility of documents provided by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Company in Thailand and not carefully check xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay time of departure before xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay wire transfer to Company S resulting in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay consequence that Company S does not deliver xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay goods.  Therefore, Company T claimed damages of VND 60,485,000 from Company C. In xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay reconciliation record dated March 27, 2017, Mr. B claimed damages of VND 39,312,000 as equivalent xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay second money transfer from Company C because Company C did not check xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay time of departure before transferring such money to Company S. Company T does not claim xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first money transfer of VND 22,288,000.

Representation of Mrs. Do Thi T - authorized representative of Company T in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay reconciliation record dated June 1, 2017: xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Contract dated July 19, 2016 between Company Y (S) and Company C was made as Company T delegates Company C to sign a contract with Company C with seller, quantity, quality, price predetermined by Company T, but Company T and Company C do not conclude a sales entrustment contract. After that, Company T entered into a Logistics Service Contract with Company C to import xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay consignment based on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Sales Contract between Company C and Company Y (S). Pursuant to Clause 1 Article V of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Logistics Service Contract between Company T and Company C, Company C acts as xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay trustor to monitor and make reports. Pursuant to Clause 6 Article II of Logistics Service Contract between Company T and Company C, Company C must import and deliver xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay goods to Company T be in its original conditions of packing.  Company C’s fault was not checking whether xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay number of bill of lading matches with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay shipping line from xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Company in Thailand and not checking xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay time of departure before transfer money for xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay second time to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Company in Thailand. It constitutes a breach of contract. Also under xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay contract dated July 19, 2016 between Company Y (S) and Company C, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay fact that Company C did not check if xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay bill of lading is real or fake before transferring money constitutes a breach of contract. Thereby, Company C made a fault resulting in breach of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Logistics Service Contract concluded with Company T. In order to reach an agreement to resolve xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case quickly, in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay previous reconciliation, Company T reduced xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount of claimed damages, only claiming damages as equivalent to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay second money transfer of 65% of contract value of VND 39,312,000 from Company C. But now that Company C does not act in good faith, Company T still upholds xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay claim as stated in lawsuit petition, claiming Company C damages of VND 60,485,000.

Representation of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant - Company C, represented by Mr. Nguyen Ba L, in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay deposition and reconciliation records: On July 12, 2016, Company C entered into a Logistics Service Contract No. 127/2016-UTNK with Company T. Company C was entrusted to import a consignment, only responsible for putting its name in import documents, customs procedures and delivery of goods to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay warehouse of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Party A when xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay goods arrive at Port C, Ho Chi Minh City. Company T contacted and agreed with Company Y (S) of Thailand by itself, sent information of Company C, made a contract with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay foreign party and negotiated quality, price, and Thailand party xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay previous sample of goods to Company T. Mr. B brought xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay scan of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Sales Contract with Company S (Thailand) to Company C and required Company C to receive money of Company T and transferred it to Company Y (S). In order to complete procedures for money transfer to Company Y (S), Company C must sign xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Sales Contract with Company S and send a copy thereof to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay bank. Company C does not know about xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay time of delivery and time of departure when there is no notice given from Company T. Company C transferred money as designated by Company T. xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay bill of lading was also sent by Company T to Company C. Company C certifies that it has concluded a Sales Contract with Company S of Thailand as designated by Company T for valid money transfer. Pursuant to Clause 6 Article II of Logistics Service Contract “Party B is obliged to import xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay goods and deliver xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay goods in their original conditions of packing to Party A according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay order and quantity that Party A has negotiated with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay foreign partner. Party A will designate xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay foreign partner to deliver xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay goods to Party A according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay contract concluded with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay foreign partner. Party B shall not held responsible for goods quality and foreign documents, late arrival notice and price declared in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay import contract”. Therefore, Company C is only obliged to put it name in import documents, complete customs procedures and deliver xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay goods to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay warehouse of Party after xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay goods arrives at Port C of Ho Chi Minh City and is not obliged to check import documents, verify if xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay foreign partner does an honest business or practices fraud because Party A provides information of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay foreign partner and Party A works with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay foreign partner to receive sample and make xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay order, etc.  In Clause 1 Article III (Responsibilities) “Party A is obliged to provide xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount of money matching with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay import contract in order for Party B to transfer to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay seller as committed in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay foreign trade contract”.  Clause 3 Article III stipulates: Company T is obliged to provide sufficient valid and accurate documents relevant to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay goods such as export license, bill of lading, contract, etc. in order for Company C to complete customs procedures and receive xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay goods. xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first money transfer to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay foreign partner right after xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay signing of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay contract is VND 22,288,000. In xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay second money transfer, after Company T received xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay bill from xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay foreign partner, Company T forwarded it to Company C and required Company C to transfer Company S remaining 65% of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay contract value of VND 39,312,000.  Company C makes no fault and has properly performed xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay contract, Company C confirms that it only concluded a Logistics Service Contract with Company T and did not sign any other sales entrustment contract. Company C concluded xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Sales Contract with Company S only for xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay purpose of performing xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Logistics Service Contract with Company T, so it denies any damages claimed by Company T. Up to now, Company C has not received any fee under xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Logistics Service Contract.

Representation of Mrs. Do Thi T - authorized representatives of Company T at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court hearing: xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner and respondent only entered into a Logistics Service Contract on July 12, 2016, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay entrustment to purchase goods from Company S was made from a phone call between Mr. B and an employee of Company C. However, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay number of Logistics Service Contract is 127/2016-NTNK, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay UTNK initials imply xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay entrustment to purchase goods from Company S. Documents such as contract, bill of lading, packing list, etc. were also provided by Company T for Company C. In xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay deposition made on January 4, 2017, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant confirms xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay acceptance of entrustment to import xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay above-mentioned consignment, but is only obliged to put it name in import documents “we accept xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay entrustment to import xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay above-mentioned consignment”. In xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay meeting minutes dated April 4, 2017, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant declares that it did not conclude any other entrustment contract with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner, but exactly, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Logistics Service Contract No. 127/2016-UTNK reflects xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay nature of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay entrustment contract that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant only signed in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay scan of Sales Contract with Company S. Pursuant to Article 15 and Article 19 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay contract which xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant signed with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Company in Thailand “Contracting parties mutually agree that any e-copy of this contract shall be treated as xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay original. Contracting parties agree to all terms and conditions of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay contract right after contracting parties conclude xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay contract”. In xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay meeting minutes dated April 4, 2017, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant declared that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant did not sign any other entrustment contract with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner but xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant confirms its role to “acts as xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay trustor to monitor and make reports”. Under xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay contract signed between xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner, Article 5 stipulates xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay charge for entrustment contract is VND 4,000,000. xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant confirms that it only signed on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay scan of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Sales Contract with Company S and it is not obliged to work with Company S. Under commerce law, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay scan is a data message, information generated, sent, received and stored in electronic means. Therefore, a scan and a typescript both have xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay same validity. As soon as possible after xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay damage occurs, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner has contacted xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant many times to deal with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Company in Thailand but xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant does not act in good faith. Therefore, based on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nayCivil Code 2005 in Viet Nam, Article 281, 302, 307, 308; Article 235, 302, 303 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Commercial Law 2005, 02 sets of contracts:  Logistics Services Contract signed by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Sales Contract signed by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Company S, based on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay record of reconciliation and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay deposition of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant made at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court, requesting xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court to force xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant to pay xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay damages of VND 39,312,000 due to a breach of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay contract.

At xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court hearing, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner requests to withdraw a part of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay lawsuit petition equivalent to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first money transfer of VND 22,288,000, and only claim xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay second money transfer of VND 39,312,000.

Representation of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant, Company C, represented by Mr. Nguyen Ba L: Company C does not sign any entrustment contract with Company T, only signing xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Logistics Service Contract on July 12, 2016. xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay phrase UTNK does not say anything, it is just a record for convenient arrangement and monitoring of documents.  Company T, by its own, contacted and negotiated xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay price, quantity ... with Company S and then brought xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay scanned contract to Company C and required Company C sign it, and then send a copy to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Bank in order to transfer money to Company S. All documents such as bills of lading, contracts ... are passed by Mr. B to Company C and Mr. B required Company C to transfer money to S. Company. Under xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Logistics Service Contract, there is no term defining that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Company C is held responsible for checking whether xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay documents are real or fake, moreover, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner provided such bills of lading and appointed xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay foreign partner to deliver goods.  Company C is only responsible for customs procedures when goods arrive at Port C, receive goods and transport them to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay warehouse for xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner. Currently, Company C has not yet received xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay service cost under xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Logistics Service Contract but it also has to pay xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay money transfer fee to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Bank.  Company C has complied with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay signed Logistics Service Contract, so it does not agree to pay any amount to Company T.

JUDGEMENT OF xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay COURT

After consideration of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case file assessed and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay adversarial process at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court hearing, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel judges as follows:

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Company initiates a lawsuit regarding a Logistics Service Contract against C Food Import and Export Limited Company, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay legal action of Company T was made within xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay prescriptive period stipulated in Article 319 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay 2005 Commercial Law, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay dispute is a type of dispute arising in commercial business activities as stipulated in Clause 1, Article 30 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code 2015. In xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Logistics Service Contract signed by both parties on July 12, 2016, Clause 7.3 of Article VII, Section General Commitment, they mutually agree:  If there is any dispute or disagreement arising or related to this contract ... xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay parties have xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay right to refer xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay dispute to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Economic Court of Ho Chi Minh City to resolve ... " "xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay agreement on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay jurisdiction of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay parties to dispute settlement is unclear and incorrect in accordance with Articles 35, 37 and 39 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay agreement on this dispute settlement body is invalid.  Therefore, Company T files a lawsuit regarding dispute over xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Logistics Service Contract with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Court of Tan Binh District and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay C Food Import and Export Limited Company is headquartered in Tan Binh District so this case belongs to jurisdiction of Tan Binh District People's Court according to Clause 1, Article 30, Point b, Clause 1, Article 35, Point a, Clause 1, Article 39 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code.

Considering xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay claim of Company T for damages of VND 39,312,000 from Company C:

Based on Logistic Service Contract No. 127/2016-UTNK dated July 12, 2016, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay presentation of Company T, Company C and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay evidence presented by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay parties:  Company T and Company C had signed a Logistics Service Contract to deliver and transport imported soybeans used for food Company T and Company C both certify that both parties only sign xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Logistic Service Contract No. 127/2016-UTNK dated July 12, 2016, between Company T and Company C there is no contract that Company T entrusted to Company C to buy commodities or import soybeans from Company S (Thailand).  In Clause 6 Article II of Logistics Service Contract that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay two parties have signed (in terms of works and expenses), it stipulates:  Party B is obliged to import goods and deliver goods in its original condition of packing to Party A according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay order and quantity that Party A has negotiated with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay foreign partner, and then Party A appoints xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay foreign partner to deliver xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay goods to Party B under xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay foreign contract.  Party B shall not held responsible for goods quality and foreign documents, late arrival notice and price declared in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay import contract”. This shows that Company S's delivery to Company C is because Company T negotiates with Company S, then appoints a foreign partner to deliver xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay goods to Company C "... according to foreign contract", but does not specifically define which contract and which company that Company C must import xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay goods from.  In Clause 3, Article III of Logistics Service Contract, there is a term on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay responsibilities of Party A:  providing a full set of valid and accurate documents related to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay goods (export license if any), certosanitary Certificate , bill of lading, contract, invoice, packing list ... for Party B to carry out customs procedures and receive goods.  Thus, all documents relating to goods, including bills of lading, provided by Company T to Company C, must be valid and accurate.  At xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay trial, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay representative of Company T also confirmed that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay sales contract (scanned version) with Company SL and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay bill of lading were all provided by Company T to Company C. In xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay bill of lading BLA228007 dated July 25, 2016 that Company T provided to Company C also shows clearly xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay information related to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay goods such as soybean, ship’s name: TR, ship’s owner: TRANS O, date on board ... so that Company T has no valid grounds for affirming that Company C has constituted xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay breach of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay contract for its failure to check xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay validity and information of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay time of departure before transferring money to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Company in Thailand. Under xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Logistics Service contract, Company C is only held responsible for xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay name on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay import documents, customs procedures, transporting goods to Company T’s warehouse (according to Article II). Company T confirms that VND 60,485,000 is xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount that Company T gave to Company C to transfer money to Company S according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay sales contract signed between Company C and Company S on July 19, 2016. Company C has also transferred this amount to Company S, certified by K Joint Stock Commercial Bank - Branch T. Company C has done xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay same as required in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Logistics Service Contract so Company C makes no fault in not receiving xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay goods of Company T. Bill of lading BLA dated July 25, 2016 is supplied by Company T to Company C so xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay failure to check xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay accuracy of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay bill of lading is entirely fault of Company T. Therefore, based on Article 302, 303 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Commercial Law 2005, Company T has no valid grounds for claiming Company C damages of VND 39,312,000.

With reference to court fees: Since xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay entire request of Company T is not accepted, according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay provisions of Clause 3, Article 27 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Ordinance on Court Charges and Fees, Company T has to pay xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance civil court fee of VND 2,000,000, deducted from xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay paid advance payment of court fees VND 1,512,125 according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay receipt of advance payment of court fees No. 0011594 dated November 10, 2016. Company T must also pay xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount of VND 487,875.

Pursuant to documents and evidence mentioned above:

HEREBY DECIDES

- Pursuant to Clause 1 Article 30, Point b Clause 1 Article 35, Point a Clause 1 Article 39; Clause 1 Article 273, Clause 1 Article 280 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nayCivil Procedure Code 2015 in Viet Nam.

- Pursuant to Articles 302, 303, 233 ofCommercial Law 2005 in Viet Nam;

- Pursuant to Clause 3 Article 27Pháp lệnh án phí, lệ phí đá bóng trực tiếp năm 2009;

1/ Turn down all lawsuit requests of T Distribution and Trading Company Limited, claiming Food C Import and Export Limited Company xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay damages of VND 39,312,000.

2/ With regard to court fees: xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance business charge is VND 2,000,000 (two million dong), which is borne by T Distribution and Trading Limited Company, deducted from xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay paid advance payment of court fee VND 1,512,125 according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay receipt of advance payment of court fees and charges No. 0011594 dated November 10, 2016. T Distribution and Trading Company Limited must pay xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount of VND 487,875 (four hundred and eighty seven thousand, eight hundred and seventy five dong).

3/ Right to appeal: xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner and defendant are entitled to appeal within 15 days from xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay date of sentencing.

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Procuracy of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay same level and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay superior People's Procuracy shall have xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay right to protest according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay provisions of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code.

In case xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment or court decision is enforced as per regulations in Article 2 ofxoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Law on enforcements of civil judgments in Viet Nam, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment creditor and judgment debtor are lawfully allowed to reach an agreement on judgment enforcement, request judgment enforcement, be subject to voluntary execution or coercive judgment enforcement in compliance with regulations in Article 6, 7, 7a and 9 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Law on enforcement of civil judgments, and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay effective period of judgment enforcement shall comply within provisions in Article 30 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Law on enforcement of civil judgments./.