trực tiếp bóng đá k+Judgement No. 347/2019/DS-PT dated august 15, 2019 regarding property ownership dispute

PEOPLE’S HIGH COURT OF HO CHI MINH CITY

JUDGEMENT NO. 347/2019/DS-PT DATED AUGUST 15, 2019 REGARDING PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISPUTE

On August 15, 2019, at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ headquarter of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s High Court of Ho Chi Minh City, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate trial of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case No. 295/2017/TLPT-DS entertained on October 31, 2017 regarding “Property dispute” took place;

Owing to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ fact that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ preliminary ruling No. 78/2017/DS-ST dated August 31, 2017 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Long An province was appealed;

According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Decision to bring trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case No. 1435/2019/QD-PT dated July 12, 2019 to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court between litigants:

- Plaintiff: Mrs. Nguyen D (Nguyen Thi Ngoc L), born in 1959 (present)

Address: M AVE S F NJ 07081, USA.

Temporary residence: Street Th (H), Ward 2, M city, Tien Giang province.

Plaintiff’s legal representative: Mrs. Le Thi Be N, born in 1954 (present)

Adress: Street Tr, Neighborhood 7, Quarter 7, Ward 6, M city, Tien Giang province.

- Defendant: Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D, born in 1968.

Address: No. 25, Street Ng, Ward 1, M city, Tien Giang province.

Defendant’s legal representative: Mr. Pham Ngoc D, born in 1972 (present)

Address: B hamlet, T commune, C district, Tien Giang province.

- Other persons with associated rights and obligations:

1/. Tien Giang province’s People’s Committee.

Address: Street 30/4, ward 1, M city, Tien Giang province.

Legal representative of Tien Giang province’s People’s Committee: Mr. Van DInh T – Deputy Director of Tien Giang province’s Land Registry. (absent)

2/. People's Committee of M city, Tien Giang province.

Address: Street H, Ward 7, M city, Tien Giang province.

Legal representative of People’s Committee of M city, Tien Giang province: Mr. Nguyen Van H – President. (absent)

3/. Mr. Nguyen Ba Nh, born in 1966 (absent)

4/. Mr. Nguyen Nhut T, born in 1993 (absent)

5/. Mr. Nguyen Huu T1, born in 1989 (absent)

Living at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ same address: No. 25, Street Ng, Ward 1, M city, Tien Giang province.

- Witness:

1/. Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc H, born in 1963 (absent)

Address: Street Th, Ward 2, M city, Tien Giang province.

2/. Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc A, born in 1968 (absent)

Address: Street Th, Ward 2, M city, Tien Giang province.

3/. Mr. Nguyen Van D, born in 1969 (absent)

Address: Street 10C, B ward, B1 district, Ho Chi Minh city.

4/. Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc S, born in 1963 (absent)

Address: Street Th, Ward 2, M city, Tien Giang province.

5/. Mr. Truong Cong T, born in 1958 (absent)

Address: Street Th, Ward 2, M city, Tien Giang province.

6/. Mrs. Truong Anh Ng, born in 1966 (absent)

Address: Street Th, Ward 2, M city, Tien Giang province.

7/. Mr. Nguyen Van M, born in 1962 (absent)

Address: Street Th, Ward 2, M city, Tien Giang province.

8/. Mr. Nguyen Ngoc Th, born in 1964 (absent)

Address: Street Th, Ward 2, M city, Tien Giang province.

9/. Nguyen Kim A, born in 1969.

Address: Street Ng, Ward 2, M city, Tien Giang province.

10/. Pham Ngoc U, born in 1964 (absent)

Address: Street T, Th, H district, Ho Chi Minh city.

- Appellant: Mrs. Nguyen D, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D, Mr. Nguyen Ba Nh, Mr. Nguyen Nhut T, Mr. Nguyen Huu T1.

CASE DESCRIPTION

Plaintiff Nguyen D (Nguyen Thi Ngoc L)’s authorized representative, Mrs. Le Thi Be N, gave her statement as follows:

During trực tiếp bóng đá k+ period from 1990 to 1995, Mr. Nguyen Van D informed Mrs. Nguyen D that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State was holding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ liquidation sale of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land and associated real property located at No. 25 Ng Street, Ward 1, M city, Tien Giang province with a gross area of ​​97m². Mrs. Nguyen D bought that land and associated real property. However, because she was a foreigner, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ law in force at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time did not prevent her from being named as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ owner of such property, she asked her natural sister, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D, to buy and bear her name as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ owner of such property. Mrs. Nguyen D was making payment to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State Treasury of M city, Tien Giang province in person in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ company of Mr. Nguyen Van D and Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc A as witnesses.

Later, since trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house was degraded, Mrs. Nguyen D repaired trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house at her own expense. A few years later, Mrs. Nguyen D continued to buy more land covering an area of ​​380.1m²(after trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land survey was completed and she was granted trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land tenure certificate (certificate of occupancy), trực tiếp bóng đá k+ area of land recorded in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ original tenure certificate No. 31572 in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ register issued on February 5, 2002 by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of Chau Thanh district, Tien Giang province to Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D's for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land covering an area of 348.5m² situated at neighborhood 14, hamlet P, commune P1, M city, Tien Giang province), located at neighborhood 14, hamlet P, commune P1, M city, Tien Giang Province, and asked Mrs. D to bear her name as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ holder of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificate.

Up to now, as Vietnamese law allows foreigners to hold trực tiếp bóng đá k+ title of house and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ tenure of land, Mrs. Nguyen D asked Mrs. D to return trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land, but Mrs. D disagreed and replied that “Concerning trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Sixth sister (Mrs. Nguyen D)’s house, D and I can make arrangement", which was recorded by Mrs. Nguyen D and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ audio recording was submitted to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court on August 22, 2017, and Mrs. D asked Mrs. Nguyen D to buy her another house as a precondition for return of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ disputed house and land.

Due to failure to reach agreement, Mrs. Nguyen D sued to petition trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court to resolve trực tiếp bóng đá k+ following issues:

Firstly, forcing Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D and persons whose rights and obligations related to Mr. Nguyen Ba Nh, Mr. Nguyen Nhut T, and Mr. Nguyen Huu T1 to hand over trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land and house located at No. 25, Ng Street, Ward 1, M city, Tien Giang province (through trực tiếp bóng đá k+ site survey, as stated in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificate of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ survey results issued on June 26, 2017 by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land survey company D, this land parcel covers an area of 94.6m²) and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ garden land located at neighborhood 14, hamlet P, commune P1, M city, Tien Giang province (through trực tiếp bóng đá k+ site survey, as stated in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificate of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ survey results issued on June 26, 2017 by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land survey company D, this land parcel covers an area of 260.4 m²).

Secondly, requesting trực tiếp bóng đá k+ revocation of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ original land tenure certificate No. 31572 recorded in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ register on February 5, 2002 and issued by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of Chau Thanh district, Tien Giang province to Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ homeowner for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land located at neighborhood 14, hamlet P, commune P1, M city, Tien Giang province (now M city, Tien Giang province and requesting trực tiếp bóng đá k+ revocation of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ original certificate of occupancy of land and title to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 12296 dated December 19, 2012 issued by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of Tien Giang province to Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D and Mr. Nguyen Ba Nh for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land located at No. 25, Ng street, ward 1, M city, Tien Giang province.

- Thirdly, requesting Mrs. D to fulfill her obligation to repay VND 26,900,000 (including VND 1,900,000 as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cost of land survey and VND 25,000,000 as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cost of disputed property valuation) as total cost of survey and valuation to Mrs. Nguyen D.

Plaintiff Nguyen Thi Ngoc D's authorized representative, Mr. Pham Ngoc D, gave his statement as follows:

Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D disagreed with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ petition to sue of Mrs. Nguyen D. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ disputed house and land are trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property of hers and Mr. Nh, Mr. T and Mr. T1. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ properties, including: Land and house located at No. 25, Ng Street, Ward 1, M City, Tien Giang Province through trực tiếp bóng đá k+ site survey, as stated in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificate of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ survey results issued on June 26, 2017 by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land survey company D, this land parcel covers an area of 94.6m²), and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ garden land located at neighborhood 14, hamlet P, commune P1, M city, Tien Giang province (through trực tiếp bóng đá k+ site survey, as stated in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificate of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ survey results issued on June 26, 2017 by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land survey company D, this land parcel covers an area of 260.4 m²). As these property items are currently under Mrs. D's family’s management for a long-term and stable use and taxes on these property items were paid by Mrs. D to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State, she did not agree to return trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land to Mrs. Nguyen D. Due to disagreeing with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff's petition to sue, Mrs. D had no idea about trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request for payment of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ reimbursement for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ survey and valuation costs to Mrs. Nguyen D, which is worth VND 26,900,000 (including VND 1,900,000 as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ survey cost and VND 25,000,000 as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cost of valuation of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ disputed property).

As a person with associated rights and obligations, Mr. Nguyen Ba Nha made his statement as follows:

Mr. Nh is Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D’s husband. For trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property in dispute in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case, it is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ common property of Mr. Nh's family, including: Mr. Nh, Mrs. D, Mr. T, Mr. T1. These items were all obtained through trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal purchase and sale, not bought and registered on behalf of Mrs. D as she put it. Mr. Nh has managed, used and paid taxes on such house and land continually since then. Therefore, Mrs. Nguyen D’s claim that she asked Mrs. D, Mr. Nh’s wife, to act on her behalf to bear her name in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land tenure certificate is ungrounded. Mr. Nh disagreed with Mrs. D claim on Mrs. Nguyen D’s property, including trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land and house at No. 25, Ng street, ward 1, M city, Tien Giang province and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ garden land at neighborhood 14, hamlet P, commune P1, M city, Tien Giang province.

As a person with associated rights and obligations, Mr. Nguyen Nhut T made his statement as follows:

Mr. T, who is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ natural child of Mr. Nh and Mrs. D, agreed with Mr. Nh's statement. In addition, he did not have any other opinion or request and petitioned for his absence during trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court’s resolution of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case.

As a person with associated rights and obligations, Mr. Nguyen Huu T1 made his statement as follows:

Mr. T1, who is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ natural child of Mr. Nh and Mrs. D, agreed with Mr. Nh's statement. In addition, he did not have any other opinion or request and petitioned for his absence during trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court’s resolution of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case.

In trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Official Dispatch No. 168 / UBND-TN & MT dated January 24, 2017 and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Official Dispatch No. 729 / UBND-VP dated February 15, 2017 issued by People's Committee of M city, Tien Giang province as a person with related rights and obligations, they made trực tiếp bóng đá k+ following statement:

- After consulting documents stating grant of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land tenure certificate for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ ​​land parcel located at neighborhood 14, hamlet P, commune P1, Chau Thanh district, Tien Giang province (now M city, Tien Giang province); trực tiếp bóng đá k+ original file of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land tenure certificate No. 31572 recorded in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ register on February 5, 2002 which was issued by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of Chau Thanh district, Tien Giang province to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ homeowner, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ city realized that this land was previously under Mrs. Nguyen Ngoc E’s ownership (Mrs. E was granted trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land tenure certificate No. 31080QSD / 230 / QD.UBH in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ register on March 6, 2000 for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ area of 348.5m²), who was then transferred all of such land to Mrs. D on January 14, 2002 according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land tenure transfer contract, which was examined by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Land Administration Department of Chau Thanh district and authenticated by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of Chau Thanh district on January 25, 2002, and on February 5, 2002, Mrs. D received trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land tenure certificate by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of Chau Thanh district.

Granting trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land tenure certificate to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ homeowner Mrs. D conformed to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ processes, procedures and provisions of law. However, because trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land tenure certificate and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land tenure transfer contract between Mrs. D and Mrs. Em were both authenticated by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of Chau Thanh district, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of M city would provide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court with related documents upon request.

According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Official Dispatch No. 4039/UBND-TD dated August 25, 2017, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of Tien Giang province, playing a role as a person with related rights and obligations, made trực tiếp bóng đá k+ following statement:

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of Tien Giang province already provided documents and evidence at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Official Dispatch No. 1155 / TL-VPDK dated July 25, 2017 and attached documents.

With respect to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ disputed property, including trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land at No. 25, Ng Street, Ward 1, M City, Tien Giang Province, Mrs. D was entitled to buy a legal residential house in M city’s People's Committee under trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house sale and purchase contract No. 28 / HD.N dated October 21, 1992 between M city’s Department of Basic Construction (representing M city’s People's Committee) and Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ purchase and sale was compliant with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of Article 7 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Government's Decree No. 60-CP in Viet Namof July 5, 1994 on house title and urban residential land tenure. Regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ residential land, Mrs. D has used trực tiếp bóng đá k+ residential house attached to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ residential land stably and continuously since 1992 and was certificated by a competent state authority as prescribed in Clause 1, Article 2 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên y. Hence, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of Tien Giang province has no grounds for revoking trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land tenure certificate issued to Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D and Mr. Nguyen Ba Nh.

Witnesses, Mr. Tran Ngoc M and Mrs. Pham Ngoc U, made their testimonies as follows:

When Mr. M and Mrs. U, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ niblings of Mrs. L and Mrs. D, bought trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land at No. 25 Ng Street, Ward 1, M City, Tien Giang Province, Mrs. L directly hired Mr. M and Mrs. U, Mr. Nguyen Van M, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc S, Mr. Truong Cong T, Mrs. Truong Anh Ng to come to clean trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house, and paid their wages. Mrs. D was not involved in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cleaning work. Then Mr. M and Mrs. U happened to know that Mrs. L directly bought trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land at No. 25, Ng Street, Ward 1, City M, Tien Giang Province and asked Mrs. D to lend her name as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ owner of that land and house.

Witness, Mr. Nguyen Ngoc Th, gave his testimony as follows:

He is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ natural younger brother of Mrs. L and Mrs. D. As a family member, he knew trực tiếp bóng đá k+ truth about trực tiếp bóng đá k+ disputed property, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land located at No. 25, Ng street, ward 1, M city, Tien Giang province. This property was directly bought by Mrs. L by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ help of Nguyen Van D, as an intermediary, who worked in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ state regulatory authority and knew trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State's liquidation sale.  trực tiếp bóng đá k+ reason why Mrs. L did not let Mr. Th or Mrs. H, as a younger brother or sister living in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ same family, bear his/her name as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land tenure certificate holder, but decided to get Mrs. D to do so was because Mrs. D had not been named as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ owner of any land.

Mrs. L bought trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land parcel at neighborhood 14, hamlet P, commune P1, Chau Thanh district, Tien Giang province (now M city, Tien Giang province) after hearing about such property from Mrs. H's friend.  Mrs. L sent money from abroad to her mother, Mrs. Tr, to pay for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land and got Mrs. D to bear her name as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ owner on her behalf.

Witness, Mrs. Nguyen Kim A, gave her testimony as follows:

When Mr. M and Mrs. U, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ niblings of Mrs. L and Mrs. D, bought trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land at No. 25 Ng Street, Ward 1, M City, Tien Giang Province, Mrs. L directly hired Mr. M and Mrs. U, Mr. Nguyen Van M, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc S, Mr. Truong Cong T, Mrs. Truong Anh Ng to come to clean trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house, and paid their wages. Mrs. D was not involved in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cleaning work. Then Mr. M and Mrs. U happened to know that Mrs. L directly bought trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land at No. 25, Ng Street, Ward 1, City M, Tien Giang Province and asked Mrs. D to lend her name as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ owner of that land and house.

Witness, Mr. Nguyen Van D, gave his testimony as follows:

He is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ adoptive child of Mrs. Tr (trực tiếp bóng đá k+ natural mother of Mrs. L) and Mrs. D. In 1992, he was trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Director of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Tobacco Factory of Tien Giang Province and was assigned to manage 6 houses, including trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land at No. 25, Ng street, Ward 1, M city, Tien Giang province. He was trực tiếp bóng đá k+ one who told Mrs. L to buy this house and land when trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State made trực tiếp bóng đá k+ liquidation sale. At that time, as an overseas Vietnamese, Mrs. L could afford to buy that property. In addition, he did not gave any other testimony and petitioned for his absence during trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court’s resolution of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case.

Witness, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc H, gave her testimony as follows:

She is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ natural younger brother of Mrs. L and Mrs. D. As a family member, she knew trực tiếp bóng đá k+ dispute. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land located at No. 25, Ng street, ward 1, M city, Tien Giang province was directly bought by Mrs. L after she heard about such property from Nguyen Van D, who worked in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ state regulatory authority and knew trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State's liquidation sale.  trực tiếp bóng đá k+ reason why Mrs. L did not let Mr. Th or Mrs. H, as a younger brother or sister living in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ same family, bear his/her name as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land tenure certificate holder, but decided to get Mrs. D to do so was because Mrs. D had not been named as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ owner of any land.

Mrs. L bought trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land parcel at neighborhood 14, hamlet P, commune P1, Chau Thanh district, Tien Giang province (now M city, Tien Giang province) after hearing about such property from her friend.  Mrs. L sent money from abroad to her mother, Mrs. Tr, to pay for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land and got Mrs. D to bear her name as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ owner on her behalf.

Witness, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc S, Mr. Truong Cong T, Mrs. Truong Anh Ng and Mr. Nguyen Van M, gave their testimonies as follows:

Mrs. S, Mr. T1, Mrs. Ng and Mr. M are siblings born to relatives of Mrs. L and Mrs. D. When Mrs. L bought trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land at No. 25 Ng Street, Ward 1, M City, Tien Giang Province, Mrs. L directly hired Mrs. Kim A, Mr. M, Mrs. U, Mr. Nguyen Van M, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc S, Mr. Truong Cong T, Mrs. Truong Anh Ng to come to clean trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house, and paid their wages. Mrs. D was not involved in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cleaning work. Then they happened to know that Mrs. L directly bought trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land at No. 25, Ng Street, Ward 1, City M, Tien Giang Province and asked Mrs. D to lend her name as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ owner of that land and house.

Witness, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc A, gave her testimony as follows:

She is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ natural younger sister of Mrs. L and Mrs D. In 1993, after being recommended by Mr. Nguyen Van D, Mrs. L decided to buy trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land at No. 25, Ng street, Ward 1, M city, Tien Giang province. At trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of paying money at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ treasury, Mrs. D drove Mrs. A1 and Mrs. L to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ treasury of M city and Mrs. D was trực tiếp bóng đá k+ signatory to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ receipt. After buying trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house, Mrs. L asked Mrs. A1 and some other people to clean trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house, and directly paid them. According to what she saw during my cleaning service, Mrs. A1 confirmed that Mrs. L directly bought trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land at No. 25, Ng street, Ward 1, M city, Tien Giang province, and got Mrs. D to bear her name as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ owner of such property.

According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ preliminary ruling No. 78/2017/DS-ST dated August 31, 2017, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Tien Giang province decided that:

Pursuant to Articles 256 in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ 2005 Civil Code; point c of clause 1 of Article 688 in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ 2015 Civil Code.

Pursuant to Clause 2, Article 27 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Pháp lệnh án phí, lệ phí đá bóng trực tiếp năm 2009; Clause 1, Article 17 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Nghị quyết 01/2012/NQ-HĐTP hướng dẫn áp dụngdated June 13, 2012 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Panel of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People's Court, guiding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ application of a number of provisions of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ law on court fees and charges; Clause 1, Article 48 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Resolution No. 326/2016 / UBTVQH14 dated December 30, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Standing Committee of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ National Assembly, stipulating “rates, exemption, reduction, collection, payment, management and use of court fees and charges”.

In accordance with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ judicial precedent No. 02/2016/AL ratified by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Panel of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People's Court on April 6, 2016 and published as an annex to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Decision No. 220/QD-CA dated April 6, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Chief Justice of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People’s Court.

Ruled that:

- Accept part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ petition to sue of Mrs. Nguyen D (Nguyen Thi Ngoc L) for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property.

+ Forcing Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D and other family members of hers such as Nguyen Ba Nh, Nguyen Nhut T and Nguyen Huu T1 to return Mrs. Nguyen D (Nguyen Thi Ngoc L) trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house located on a land covering an area of ​​90.18 m²at No. 25 Ng, Ward 1, M City, Tien Giang Province, which is built with a concrete structure, walls, concrete roof, according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house title and land tenure certificate No. 12296 dated December 19, 2002 issued by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of Tien Giang province to Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D and Mr. Nguyen Ba Nh, who bear their names as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ owners of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property.

+ Revoking trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificate of occupancy of land and title to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 12296 dated December 19, 2012 issued by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of Tien Giang province to Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D and Mr. Nguyen Ba Nh for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house located at No. 25, Ng street, ward 1, M city, Tien Giang province.

+ Mrs. Nguyen D (Nguyen Thi Ngoc L) is entitled to apply for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ state authority’s grant of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificate of house title and land tenure for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land at No. 25, Ng street, Ward 1, M City, Tien Giang Province, which is mentioned above, in accordance with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ law.

+ Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D, Mr. Nguyen Ba Nh, Mr. Nguyen Nhut T and Mr. Nguyen Huu T1 may stay for a period of 06 (six) months from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ effective date of this judgment. Upon trực tiếp bóng đá k+ expiration of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above time limit, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above-mentioned house and land must be returned to Mrs. Nguyen D (Nguyen Thi Ngoc L).

+ Forcing Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D, Mr. Nguyen Ba Nh, Mr. Nguyen Nhut T and Mr. Nguyen Huu T1 to pay Mrs. Nguyen D (Nguyen Thi Ngoc L) an amount of VND 626,262,000 (six hundred twenty six million and two hundred sixty two thousand dong) determined in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ valuation certificate dated August 1, 2017 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Sai Gon Valuation and Appraisal Joint Stock Company for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land covering an area of 380.1m²(260.4m² defined after completion of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ site survey) at Hamlet P , P1 commune, Chau Thanh district, Tien Giang province (now M city) according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land tenure certificate No. 31572 / QSDD / PT dated February 5, 2002 issued to Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ homeowner.

+ Forcing Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D, Mr. Nguyen Ba Nh, Mr. Nguyen Nhut T and Mr. Nguyen Huu T1 to repay trực tiếp bóng đá k+ costs of land survey and valuation totalling VND 26,900,000 (twenty-six million and nine hundred thousand dong) to Mrs. Nguyen D (Nguyen Thi Ngoc L).

Monetary payment, payment of land-related costs, costs of land surveying and valuation must be made after trực tiếp bóng đá k+ judgment takes effect.

From trực tiếp bóng đá k+ effective date of this judgement and Mrs. Nguyen D (Nguyen Thi Ngoc L)’s submission of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ petition for judgment execution. If Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D, Mr. Nguyen Ba Nh, Mr. Nguyen Nhut T and Mr. Nguyen Huu T1 delayed paying trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above amounts to Mrs. Nguyen D, they will have to pay trực tiếp bóng đá k+ interest as prescribed in Article 357 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ 2015 Civil Code.

In addition, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ preliminary ruling also rules on court costs and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to appeal in cases according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ law.

On September 11, 2017, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D, Mr. Nguyen Ba Nh, Mr. Nguyen Huu T1 and Mr. Nguyen Nhut T filed an appeal against trực tiếp bóng đá k+ entire preliminary ruling.

On September 12, 2017, Mrs. Nguyen D made an appeal against part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ preliminary ruling with a view to requesting trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant to return to her trực tiếp bóng đá k+ tenure of 260.4m² of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 2471 located at Hamlet P, Commune P1, M City, Tien Giang Province.

At trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ authorized representative of Mrs. Nguyen D withdrew an appeal against trực tiếp bóng đá k+ recognition of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ tenure of 260.4 m²of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 2471 located at hamlet P, commune P1, ​​M city, Tien Giang province; concurrently, made trực tiếp bóng đá k+ following statement: Mrs. D, as a tailor, and Mr. Nh, as a ward officer, cannot afford to pay 95 taels of gold. Because Mrs. L was a foreigner that could not bear her name as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ owner of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property, she asked Mrs. D to lend her name as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ owner. In fact, all sums paid for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ purchase of such property was paid by Mrs. L.

Defendant Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D and persons with associated rights and obligations, including Mr. Nguyen Ba Nh, Mr. Nguyen Huu T and Mr. Nguyen Huu T1, made their statements as follows:  From 1992 up to now, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff has not had any documents proving that Mrs. L asked Mrs. D to lend her name as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ homeowner. All papers and documents on such property show trực tiếp bóng đá k+ name of Mrs. D as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ homeowner, and there was no dispute arising from home construction activities. Therefore, they requested trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel to revise trực tiếp bóng đá k+ preliminary ruling in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ direction of not accepting trực tiếp bóng đá k+ whole petition to sue from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Procuracy expressed his/her argument on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ resolution of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case:

- Regarding legal process: Trial Panel and litigants strictly complied with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Procedure Code.

- Regarding case contents:  trực tiếp bóng đá k+ preliminary ruling that accepted part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff's petition to sue is grounded and compliant with law. At trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court, as all litigants did not provide any new documents and evidence, they request trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel not to accept trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeals of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigants; uphold trực tiếp bóng đá k+ preliminary ruling.

Based on documents and evidence that have been checked and verified, results of questioning and litigation activities in court, after considering evidence and opinions of litigants and procurators in a full and comprehensive manner;

COURT’S ARGUMENTS

[1] In trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court of appeal, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff, Mrs. Nguyen D, withdrew a petition to appeal. Pursuant to Article 284 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Procedure Code, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel adjourned trực tiếp bóng đá k+ adjudication of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff's appeal.

[2] In trực tiếp bóng đá k+ light of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal filed by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff and other persons with associated rights and obligations:

[2.1] With respect to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house at No. 25, Street Ng, Ward 1, M city, Tien Giang province:

Based on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ testimonies of witnesses involved in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case, such as Mr. Tran Ngoc M, Mrs. Pham Ngoc U (trực tiếp bóng đá k+ nephew or niece of Mrs. L (aka Nguyen D) and Mrs. D), Mr. Nguyen Ngoc Th, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc H and Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc A (trực tiếp bóng đá k+ natural younger sister of Mrs. L and Mrs. D), Mr. Nguyen Kim A, Mr. Nguyen Van D, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc S, Mr. Truong Cong T, Mrs. Truong Anh Ng, ... (relatives of both Mrs. L and Mrs. D ), trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above real property was bought by Mrs. L through trực tiếp bóng đá k+ recommendation of Mr. Nguyen Van D and Mrs. D was asked to lend her name as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ homeowner.

For trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 2471 covering an area of 260.4m², located at Hamlet P, Commune P1, M city, Tien Giang Province, Mr. Th and Mrs. H, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ natural younger brothers of Mrs. L and Mrs. D, confirmed that Mrs. L sent money from abroad to her mother, Mrs. Tr, to pay for such property and asked Mrs. D to lend her name to register as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ homeowner.

Testimonies of witnesses were consistent with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff's statement in which trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff stated that she paid for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transfer of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above-mentioned property. Because trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff was an overseas Vietnamese that was ineligible to bear her name as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ owner of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property in Vietnam, she asked trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant to lend her name to register as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ owner of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant stated that she was directly involved in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ sale and purchase of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aforementioned property but there was none of evidence of her payment.

Therefore, there are grounds to conclude that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff's statement is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ truth. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance court’s recognition that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff spent money to buy trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land at 25 Ng and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 2471 at hamlet P, commune P1, M city, Tien Giang province is grounded.

[2.2] However, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance Court’s ruling that Mrs. Nguyen D had trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house title and land tenure for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 25 Ng, and recognition that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D was allowed to continue using trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot number 2471 at Hamlet P and refunded to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff trực tiếp bóng đá k+ amount of VND 626,262,000, are in breach of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ law.

[2.2.1] Under trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of Clause 2, Article 159 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+vtv5 trực tiếp, foreign organizations and individuals are entitled to own houses in Vietnam by "... purchasing, lease-purchasing, receiving as a gift or donation of, inheriting commercial houses, including apartments and detached houses, within housing construction investment projects". Clause 1 of Article 75 in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Government’sDecree No. 99/2015/ND-CPdated October 20, 2015 providing guidance on implementation of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on Housing prescribes that “foreign organizations and individuals are entitled to own houses within housing construction investment projects only". trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 25 Ng is not part of a commercial housing construction project. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance Court’s ruling under which Mrs. Nguyen D was entitled to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house title and land tenure for such house and Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D’s certificate is in breach of legislative regulations.

Mrs. Nguyen D can only be entitled to claim on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house title and land tenure for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land at 25 Ng and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 2471 at Hamlet P.

[2.2.2] Although Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D did not spend money to buy trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 25 Ng and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 2471 but, from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of purchase to now, Mrs. D and her family members were in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ custody of such property. Therefore, it is obliged to apply trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Legal Precedent No. 02/2016 / AL dated April 6, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Panel of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People's Court to take into account trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant’s effort to preserving and embellishing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ disputed property.

According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house purchase and sale contract dated October 21, 1992, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 25 Ng was VND 438,900,000 (equivalent to 95 taels of gold); Under trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract of land tenure transfer on January 10, 2002, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 2471 at Hamlet P had trực tiếp bóng đá k+ purchase price of VND 30,000,000. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ two items of property mentioned above according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ valuation certificate No. 391/18 / CT-CN-VALUINCO dated January 7, 2019 of Southern International Investment Consulting and Valuation Joint Stock Company is VND 9,717,100,000.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff is entitled to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ award calculated as follows: Principal amount VND 468,900,000 + ½ differential (current value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property VND 9,717,100,000 – principal amount VND 468,900,000) = VND 5,093,000,000.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant is entitled to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ award calculated as follows: ½ differential between trực tiếp bóng đá k+ current value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property VND 9,717,100,000 – principal amount VND 468,900,000 = VND 4,624,100,000.

Thus, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant has trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to own trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and use trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land at 25 Ng and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to use trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 2471 at Hamlet P and must pay back to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff trực tiếp bóng đá k+ amount of VND 5,093,000,000. In trực tiếp bóng đá k+ event that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant fails to pay trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above award, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff is entitled to request trực tiếp bóng đá k+ sale of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 25 Ng and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 2471 at Hamlet P for payment.

[2.3] From trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above arguments, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel finds it necessary to accept part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant's appeal, and revise part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ preliminary ruling.

[3] Due to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ revision of a part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ preliminary ruling, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance court fee is recalculated as follows: trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff Mrs. Nguyen D is liable for 200,000 VND as civil court costs without quota for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ petition to revoke trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant's certificate of house title and land tenure which was rejected by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel. Also, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff must pay 118,241,000 VND for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cost of first-instance court for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant is entitled to.

Defendants Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D, Mr. Nguyen Ba Nh, Mr. Nguyen Nhut T and Mr. Nguyen Huu T1 are liable for court fees for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ amount of VND 5,093,000,000 repaid to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff: VND 122,930,000.

[4] trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellant is exempted from paying appellate court fees.

In light of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aforesaid arguments,

HEREBY DECIDES

Upon applying Article 284, Clause 2 of Article 308 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Civil Procedure Code in Viet Nam, and Article 256 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ 2005 Civil Code; Point a, Clause 1, Article 688 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+2015 Civil Code in Viet Nam.

Applying trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Judicial Precedent No.02/2016/AL in Viet Namratified by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Panel of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People's Court on April 6, 2016 and published as an annex to trực tiếp bóng đá k+Quyết định 220/QĐ-CA năm 2016 cvtv2dated April 6, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Chief Justice of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People’s Court.

Upon applying trực tiếp bóng đá k+Nghị quyết 326/2016/UBTVQH14 quy định về mứcdated December 30, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Standing Committee of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ National Assembly, stipulating rates, exemption, reduction, collection, payment, management and use of court fees and charges.

I/. Adjourning trực tiếp bóng đá k+ adjudication of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal filed by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff Mrs. Nguyen D (Nguyen Thi Ngoc L).

II/. Accepting part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal filed by Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D, Mr. Nguyen Ba Nh, Mr. Nguyen Nhut T, Mr. Nguyen Huu T1.

Revising trực tiếp bóng đá k+ preliminary ruling No. 78/2017/DS-ST dated August 31, 2017 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Tien Giang province.

Ruling that:

1/. Accepting part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ petition to sue of Mrs. Nguyen D (Nguyen Thi Ngoc L) for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property.

Forcing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant Nguyen Thi Ngoc D and her family members, including Mr. Nguyen Ba Nh, Mr. Nguyen Nhut T and Mr. Nguyen Huu T1, to pay trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff trực tiếp bóng đá k+ total amount of VND 5,093,000,000 (five billion and ninety three million dong) as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house title and residential land tenure for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house covering an area of ​​90.18m²at 25 Ng, Ward 1, M city, Tien Giang province, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ tenure of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land covering an area of 260.4m²of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 2471 located at Hamlet P, commune P1, M city, Tien Giang province.

Forcing Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D, Mr. Nguyen Ba Nh, Mr. Nguyen Nhut T and Mr. Nguyen Huu T1 to repay trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cost of land survey and valuation totalling VND 26,900,000 (twenty-six million and nine hundred thousand dong) to Mrs. Nguyen D (Nguyen Thi Ngoc L).

From trực tiếp bóng đá k+ date on which trực tiếp bóng đá k+ judgement takes effect (for cases where trực tiếp bóng đá k+ law enforcement agency has trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to take initiative in executing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court’s judgement) or from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ date on which trực tiếp bóng đá k+ judgment execution request is sent from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ beneficiary of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court's award (for cases in which trực tiếp bóng đá k+ award must be paid to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ beneficiary) to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ date on which trực tiếp bóng đá k+ award is completely paid, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person obliged for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court order must be liable for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ monthly interest on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ money still owed at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ interest rate prescribed in Article 377 and Article 468 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ 2015 Civil Code, unless otherwise prescribed by law.

2/. Rejecting trực tiếp bóng đá k+ petition to sue of Mrs. Nguyen D (Nguyen Thi Ngoc L) for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ revocation of:

- trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificate of occupancy of land and title to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house No. 12296 dated December 19, 2012 issued by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of Tien Giang province to Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D and Mr. Nguyen Ba Nh for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house located at No. 25, Ng street, ward 1, M city, Tien Giang province.

- trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificate of occupancy of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land No. 31572/QSDD/PT dated February 5, 2002 issued by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of Chau Thanh district to Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D for for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land covering an area of 380.1m²(260.4m²defined after completion of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ site survey) at hamlet P, commune P1, Chau Thanh district, Tien Giang province.

3/. First-instance court fee:

Mrs. Nguyen D has to pay 200,000 VND of civil court fee without quota and 118,241,000 VND for civil court cost with quota. Deducting VND 200,000 of advance payment for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court cost received from Mrs. Nguyen D according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ receipt No. 001785 dated December 16, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Judgment Execution Department of Tien Giang province. Mrs. Nguyen D also has to pay VND 118,241,000.

Defendants Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D, Mr. Nguyen Ba Nh, Mr. Nguyen Nhut T and Mr. Nguyen Huu T1 are jointly liable for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ amount of VND 122,930,000 as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ fee for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ civil court with quota.

4/. Appellate court fee:

Refunding VND 300,000 of advance payment for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court cost to Mrs. Nguyen D (Nguyen Thi Ngoc L) according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ receipt No. 002135 dated September 12, 2017 issued by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Judgment Execution Department of Tien Giang province.

Refunding VND 300,000 of advance payment for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court cost to Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ngoc D, Mr. Nguyen Ba Nh, Mr. Nguyen Nhut T and Mr. Nguyen Huu T1 per each according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ receipt No. 002134 dated September 11, 002191, 002192 and 001190 dated October 12, 2017 issued by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Judgment Execution Department of Tien Giang province, respectively.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Appellate Judgement shall enter into force from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ pronouncement date.

In cases where trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court judgement or decision is executed under trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of Article 2 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Luật thi đá bóng trực tiếp dân sự 2008 Số hiệu, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ oblige/beneficiary and obligor to execution of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ civil judgment may have trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to negotiate about how trực tiếp bóng đá k+ judgment is executed, voluntarily execute trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court judgement or shall be subject to law enforcement processes under Articles 6, 7 and 9 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on Civil Judgment Execution; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time limit for execution of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court judgement, shall be subject to regulations laid down in Article 30 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on Civil Judgement Execution.