vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nayCassation judgment No. 30/2006/DS-GDT dated October 3, 2006 regarding inheritance dispute

COUNCIL OF JUSTICES OF vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay SUPREME PEOPLE’S COURT

CASSATION JUDGMENT NO. 30/2006/DS-GDT DATED OCTOBER 3, 2006 REGARDING INHERITANCE DISPUTE

...

On October 3, 2006, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay cassation trial was conducted at vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay office of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court to hear vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay civil case of inheritance dispute between:

Plaintiff:

1. Mr. Giang Quoc Hai, born in 1935; address: 86, Cong Quynh Street, Pham Ngu Lao ward, district 1, Ho Chi Minh City;

2. Mr. Loi Xu Ha, born in 1937; address: 34B 3^rdfloor, Nguyen Duy Duong Street, ward 8, district 5, Ho Chi Minh City;

3. Mrs. Loi Muoi, born in 1943; address: 33, group 6, Linh Dong commune, Thu Duc district, Ho Chi Minh City.

Defendant:

1. Mr. Loi Quoc, born in 1952; address: 8/18, Co Giang Street, Di An town, Thuan An district, Binh Duong province;

2. Mr. Loi Nguu, born in 1946; address: 214/12, hamlet 2, Dong village, Dong Hoa commune, Thuan An district, Binh Duong province.

Persons with relevant rights and obligations:

1. Mr. Loi Phu, born in 1941; place of residence: vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay USA (duly represented by his son Mr. Loi Phuc Phat, address: 55/2 Truong Van Ky Street, ward 12, Tan Binh district, Ho Chi Minh City);

2. Mr. Loi Tan, born in 1949; place of residence: vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay USA (duly represented by his niece Ms. Loi My Ngan, address: 55/2 Truong Van Ky Street, ward 12, Tan Binh district, Ho Chi Minh City);

DEEMING THAT

Representation of Mr. Giang Quoc Hai, Mr. Loi Xu Ha, Mrs. Loi Muoi in vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay lawsuit petition dated November 30, 1994 and testimonies at vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court:

Mr. Loi Chuong (died in 1988) and his wife Mrs. Giang Diu (died in 1985) had 7 children: Mr. Giang Quoc Hai, Mr. Loi Xu Ha, Mrs. Loi Muoi, Mr. Loi Phu, Mr. Loi Tan, Mr. Loi Nguu and Mr. Loi Quoc.

With reference to property, Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu had a 2-room house at No. 8/10 (old number 2/10), Co Giang Street, Di An town, Thuan An district, Binh Duong province (managed by Mr. Quoc).

In 1976, Mr. Chuong bought a land plot with area of 0.71 mou (unit of land measurement, currently 6.451m²) spending his own money from Mr. Hieu and his wife at hamlet 2, Dong village, Dong Hoa commune, Thuan An district, Binh Duong province and let Mr. Loi Quoc have his name on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay transfer paperwork, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay transfer was certified by vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay local government. After transfer, on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land plot, Mr. Quoc has planted fruit trees by himself, Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu built a house with corrugated iron roof, plank wall and soil base to provide Mr. Loi Nguu with a dwelling. Meanwhile, Mr. Loi Quoc still had lived together with Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu at vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 8/18, Co Giang Street, Di An town. While living in Dong Hoa, Mr. Nguu kept planting some fruit trees and cultivated on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land plot bought by Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu. Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu died without a will, Mr. Quoc kept managing and using vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 8/18, Co Giang Street and spent his own money to repair vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house when it was damaged; in vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay meantime, Mr. Nguu kept living in vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house at hamlet 2, Dong village, Dong Hoa commune. Mr. Hai, Mr. Ha and Mrs. Muoi thereby filed a petition for distribution of inheritance of Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu being vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 8/18, Co Giang Street and house and land at hamlet 2, Dong village, Dong Hoa commune, Thuan An district, Binh Duong province as per vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay law.

Defendants Mr. Loi Nguu and Mr. Loi Quoc agree with representation of plaintiffs regarding consanguinity, however, Mr. Nguu claims that vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate of Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu is only vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 8/18, Co Giang Street, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house and land hamlet 2, Dong village, Dong Hoa commune cannot be divided because Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu gave them to him. Mr. Quoc claims that he spent his own money to purchase vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land plot at hamlet 2, Dong village lawfully in his name certified by vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay local government, after purchase, he has directly cultivated, planted many perennial crops on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land and he agreed with Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu to build a house on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land plot to provide dwelling for Mr. Nguu, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house and land at hamlet 2, Dong village, Dong Hoa commune belong to him so he contests vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay request to divide. In addition, Mr. Quoc also requests deduct an amount equivalent to expenditure on his care of parents when they were alive, their funeral and his effort to preserve, embellish, and maintain vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 8/18 Co Giang Street from vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay inheritance value.

At vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance civil judgment No.07/DSSTdated March 12, 1996, People’s Court of Song Be (old name) province judged:

1. Accept vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petition for distribution of inheritance of Mr. Loi Chuong and Mrs. Giang Diu filed by Mr. Giang Quoc Hai, Mr. Loi Xu Ha, Mrs. Loi Muoi.

2. Distribute vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate of Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu of VND 162.939.680 to their 7 children Mr. Giang Quoc Hai, Mr. Loi Xu Ha, Mrs. Loi Muoi, Mr. Loi Phu, Mr. Loi Tan, Mr. Loi Nguu and Mr. Loi Quoc, each will receive an estate portion of VND 23.277.097,14.

With reference to property in kind:

- Distribute Mr. Giang Quoc Hai, Mr. Loi Xu Ha and Mrs. Loi Muoi a joint ownership of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay right side (viewing from vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay road) of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 8/18, Co Giang Street, Di An town, Thuan An district. vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay area of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house is 77,35m²on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay area of 90,3m²with vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay structure: tile roof, brick floor, walled enclosure of VND 70.224.363, in which Mr. Loi Quoc will be reimbursed VND 2.508.113 for vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay repairs of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house and have vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay right to administer vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay area of 2,280m²of land in Dong hamlet, Dong Hoa commune (diagram A) valued at VND 518,400 on land with fruit trees valued at VND 3,650,000.Total value of distributable assets is VND 74.392.763, in which value of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate is VND 68.234.650.

Mr. Giang Quoc Hai, Mr. Loi Xu Ha, Mrs. Loi Muoi must reimburse Mr. Loi Quoc VND 2.508.113 for vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay sum of money that Mr. Loi Quoc spent on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay repair of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay right side of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 8/18, Co Giang Street, Di An town and reimburse Mr. Loi Nguu VND 3.650.000 for vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay value of fruit trees on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay 2.280m²land area, and receive VND 1.596.641,42 reimbursed from Mr. Loi Quoc in cash.

- Distribute Mr. Loi Quoc vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay ownership of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay left side (viewing from vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay road) of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 8/18, Co Giang Street, Di An town, Thuan An district with residential land area of 90,3m²and vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house with structure: tile roof, brick floor, walled enclosure; total value of land and house is VND 71.491.513 in which value of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate is VND 67.716.250, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay repair value is VND 3.775.313.Mr. Loi Quoc must reimburse Mr. Giang Quoc Hai, Mr. Loi Xu Ha and Mrs. Loi Muoi VND 1.596.641,42 and reimburse Mr. Loi Phu VND 23.277.097,14 and reimburse Mr. Loi Tan VND 19.565.414,3. Mr. Loi Quoc may be reimbursed VND 2.508.113 for repairs of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay right side of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 8/18 Co Giang from Mr. Loi Xu Ha, Mr. Giang Quoc Hai and Mrs. Loi Muoi.

- Distribute Mr. Loi Nguu a land area of 3.571m²situated in Dong hamlet, Dong Hoa commune, Thuan An town (diagram B) including 300m²of residential land of VND 26.988.780 and vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay ownership of house and wall according to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay voluntary consent of litigants. Mr. Loi Nguu may own all fruit trees on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay distributed land area of 2.280m²and be reimbursed VND 3.650.000 of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay value of these fruit trees (diagram A) from Mr. Giang Quoc Hai, Mr. Loi Xu Ha and Mrs. Loi Muoi.

Mr. Loi Nguu must reimburse Mr. Loi Tan VND 3,711,682.86 for vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay asset value of which exceeds his estate portion.

- Mr. Loi Phu may inherit VND 23,297,097.14 in cash refunded by Mr. Loi Quoc.

- Mr. Loi Tan may inherit VND 23,297,097.14 in cash, in which VND 19,565,414.30 is refunded by Mr. Loi Quoc and VND 3,711,682.86 is refunded by Mr. Loi Nguu.

In addition, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court decided vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court fee and announced vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal right to litigants as per vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay law.

After first-instance trial, on March 14, 1996, Mr. Loi Quoc made an appeal, claiming that vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land plot at hamlet 2, Dong village, Dong Hoa commune is under his ownership, so vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court was wrong when determine that vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land plot was vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate of Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu, moreover, he also requests vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court to determine his effort in preservation and maintenance of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate, care and funeral for them.

At vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate civil judgment No.183/DSPTdated October 1, 1996, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Court of People’s Supreme Court in Ho Chi Minh City judged:Uphold vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance judgment:

- Quash vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Mr. Loi Quoc’s request to claim ownership of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land plot of 6,451m² at Dong hamlet, Dong Hoa commune, Thuan An town, Song Be province and to keep all vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate, including land and house at 8/18, Co Giang Street, Di An town, Thuan An district, Song Be province.

- Accept vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petition for distribution of inheritance of Mr. Loi Chuong and Mrs. Giang Diu filed by Mr. Giang Quoc Hai, Mr. Loi Xu Ha, and Mrs. Loi Muoi.

- Distribute vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate of Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu of VND 162,939,680 to their 7 children Mr. Giang Quoc Hai, Mr. Loi Xu Ha, Mrs. Loi Muoi, Mr. Loi Phu, Mr. Loi Tan, Mr. Loi Nguu and Mr. Loi Quoc, each will receive an estate portion of VND 23,277,097.14.

With reference to property in kind:

+ Distribute Mr. Giang Quoc Hai, Mr. Loi Xu Ha and Mrs. Loi Muoi a joint ownership of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay right side of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house (viewing from vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay road) 8/18, Co Giang Street, Di An town, Thuan An district, Song Be province (old name). vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay area of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house is 77.35m2 on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay area of 90.3m2 with vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay structure: tile roof, brick floor, walled enclosure of VND 70,224,363, in which Mr. Loi Quoc will be reimbursed VND 2,508,113 for vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay repairs of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house and have vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay right to administer vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay area of 2,280m2 of land in Dong hamlet, Dong Hoa commune (called A) valued at VND 518,400 on land with fruit trees valued at VND 3,650,000. Total value of distributable assets is VND 74,392,763, in which value of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate is VND 68,234,650.

Mr. Giang Quoc Hai, Mr. Loi Xu Ha, Mrs. Loi Muoi must reimburse Mr. Loi Quoc VND 2,508,113 for vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay sum of money that Mr. Loi Quoc spent on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay repair of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay right side of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 8/18, Co Giang Street, Di An town and reimburse Mr. Loi Nguu VND 3,650,000 for vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay value of fruit trees on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay 2,280m2 land area, and receive VND 1,596,641.42 reimbursed from Mr. Loi Quoc *

+ Distribute Mr. Loi Quoc vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay ownership of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay left side (viewing from vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay road) of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 8/18, Co Giang Street, Di An town, Thuan An district with house area of 77.35m²and residential land area of 90.3m2 and vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house with structure: tile roof, brick floor, walled enclosure; total value of land and house is VND 71,491,513 in which value of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate is VND 67,716,250, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay repair value is VND 3,775,313. Mr. Loi Quoc must reimburse Mr. Giang Quoc Hai, Mr. Loi Xu Ha and Mrs. Loi Muoi VND 1,596,641.42 and reimburse Mr. Loi Phu VND 23,277,097.14 and reimburse Mr. Loi Tan VND 19,565,414.3. Mr. Loi Quoc may be reimbursed VND 2,508,113 for repairs of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay right side of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 8/18 Co Giang from Mr. Loi Xu Ha, Mr. Giang Quoc Hai and Mrs. Loi Muoi.

+ Distribute Mr. Loi Nguu a land area of 3,571m2 situated in Dong hamlet, Dong Hoa commune, Thuan An town (diagram B) including 300m2 of residential land of VND 26,988,780 and vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay ownership of house and wall according to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay voluntary consent of litigants. Mr. Loi Nguu may own all fruit trees on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay distributed land area of 2,280m2 and be reimbursed VND 3,650,000 of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay value of these fruit trees (diagram A) from Mr. Giang Quoc Hai, Mr. Loi Xu Ha and Mrs. Loi Muoi.

Mr. Loi Nguu must reimburse Mr. Loi Tan VND 3,711,682.86 for vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay asset value of which exceeds his estate portion.

+ Mr. Loi Phu may inherit VND 23,297,097.14 in cash reimbursed by Mr. Loi Quoc.

+ Mr. Loi Tan may inherit VND 23,297,097.14 in cash, in which VND 19,565,414.30 is refunded by Mr. Loi Quoc and VND 3,711,682.86 is refunded by Mr. Loi Nguu.

In addition, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate court decided vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court fee.

After appellate trial, Mr. Loi Quoc filed many claims against vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay abovementioned appellate judgment, claiming that: vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court’s determination that vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land area in hamlet 2, Dong village, Dong Hoa commune, Thuan An district is estate of Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu prejudices him.

At vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal decision No. 32/KNDS dated September 16, 1997, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Chief Justice of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court appealed vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate judgment No. 183/DSPT dated October 1, 1996 of Appellate Court of People’s Supreme Court in Ho Chi Minh City judged:vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court and appellate court are right when determining that vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 8/18, Co Giang Street, Di An town, Thuan An district, Binh Duong province is vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate of Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu and value that estate for distribution of inheritance.

vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land plot 6,451m² at hamlet 2, Dong village, Dong Hoa commune, Thuan An district, Binh Duong province is considered belong to Mr. Pham Trung Hieu and his wife. On January 16, 1976, Mr. Hieu and his wife made a “Permanent Transfer Paper”, mutually agreeing to have Mr. Loi Quoc and his wife permanently own that land plot. vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay aforesaid transfer was certified by vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay local government (case file p. 69). After vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay transfer, Mr. Quoc planted many perennial trees on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land plot by himself (certified by People’s Committee of Dong Hoa commune on April 11, 1996), and he agreed with Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu to build a house with corrugated iron roof and plank wall to provide dwelling for Mr. Loi Nguu. Therefore, it is well-grounded to consider that vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay above land plot is under ownership of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Mr. Loi Quoc, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court and appellate trial, in this case were supposed to recognize that vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land area with vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house of Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu thereon was given by Mr. Quoc, and vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay remaining land area belongs to Mr. Loi Quoc. vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay courts were wrong when recognizing all vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land plot under ownership of Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu for distribution of inheritance purpose solely based on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay depositions of plaintiffs and some witnesses.

However, according to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay on-vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay-spot investigation report, valuation report (case file p. 27,33) of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court determining that vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay above land plot includes residential land, perennial crop land and annual crop land, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court and appellate court were mistaken when determining vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay person who has agricultural land use right without specifying area of each type of land and persons who directly cultivate vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land, declare and pay taxes on annual crop land (agricultural land).

If Mr. Loi Nguu has directly cultivated vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land, declared and paid taxes on agricultural land for growing of annual crops or aquaculture, it is justifiable when determining that he has vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay right to use that land plot, however, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land plot with vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house (administered by Mr. Nguu) thereon is vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate of Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu, and vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land plot for growing of perennial crops belongs to Mr. Loi Quoc. If Mr. Loi Quoc has directly cultivated and paid taxes to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay state, except for vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land area with vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house thereon is vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate of Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay remaining land plot belongs to Mr. Loi Quoc (including land for growing of perennial crops and annual crops).

With reference to distribution of property in kind: In fact, Mr. Loi Quoc has directly managed and lived in vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 8/18, Co Giang Street so far, he spent his own money to repair vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house and has settled there, Mr. Loi Nguu has managed and lived in vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house in Dong hamlet, Dong Hoa commune since 1976. Mr. Hai, Mr. Ha and Mrs. Muoi have settled in Ho Chi Minh City and request inheritance in cash (case file p. 34, 35, 36). Mr. Phu and Mr. Tan who have lived abroad have no demand for housing in Vietnam. Therefore, it was supposed to distribute vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 8/18, Co Giang Street to Mr. Quoc, distribute vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house in Dong hamlet, Dong Hoa commune to Mr. Nguu and distribute vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay remaining value of estate to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay heirs in cash in conformity with reality and stability of real estate for litigants. However, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay courts decided to jointly distribute Mr. Hai, Mr. Ha and Mrs. Muoi a part of house in Di An town and a part of land in Dong Hoa commune causing vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay unnecessary disturbance of housing of litigants. Alternatively, Mr. Quoc in fact has lived at vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 8/18, Co Giang Street with Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu, he put considerable effort into taking care of them when they were alive and cover funeral expenses when they died, in addition, he also repaired and restored this house, therefore, before distribution of inheritance, he may receive a sum of money from vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate value equivalent to his effort, it is supposed to be vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay reasonable resolution of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case.

Chief Justice of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court requests Committee of Justices of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court in charge of cassation trial to quash vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay above appellate judgment and vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance judgment No. 07/DSST dated March 12, 1996 of People’s Court of Song Be province; refer vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case file to People’s Court of Binh Duong province for re-conducting a first-instance trial in compliance with vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay mentioned appeal.

At vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Conclusion No. 264 dated October 17, 1997, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Chief Procurator of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Procuracy unanimously concurs with vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal made by Chief Justice of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court and requests vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Committee of Justices of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court to quash vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance judgment and appellate judgment, refer vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case file to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People’s Court of Binh Duong province for re-investigation and re-trial from vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance stage.

At vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Decision No. 60/UBTP-DS dated November 6, 1997, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Committee of Justices of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court suspended settlement of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case until there are new regulations of Standing Committee of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay National Assembly on housing-related civil transactions established before July 1, 1991.

At vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay cassation trial, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay representative of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People’s Supreme Procuracy unanimously concurs with vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal of Chief Justice of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court and requests vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Council of Judges of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court to quash vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate judgment No. 183/DSPT dated October 1, 1996 of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Court of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court of Ho Chi Minh City and vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance judgment No. 07/DSST dated March 12, 1996 of People’s Court of Song Be province (old name); refer vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case file to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People’s Court of Binh Duong province for first instance re-trial as per vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay law.

CONSIDERING THAT

vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court and appellate court are right when determining that vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 8/18, Co Giang Street, Di An town, Thuan An district, Binh Duong province is vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate of Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu for distribution of inheritance.

Regarding vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay 6451m² land in hamlet 2, Dong village, Dong Hoa commune, Thuan An district, Song Be province (old name) (now is Binh Duong province), that land plot is residential land (case file p.74) originally owned by vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay family of Mr. Pham Trung Hieu. In 1976, Mr. Hieu and his wife sold that land plot; transfer paperwork is in vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay name of Mr. Loi Quoc and certified by vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay local government. However, in vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay deposition (case file p.33), Mr. Hieu stated that he sold land to Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu; Mr. Chuong paid money in person and Mr. Hieu had never transacted with Mr. Loi Quoc.  Mr. Ha, Mr. Hai, Mrs. Muoi and Mr. Nguu all gave deposition that Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu purchased this land plot but have Mr. Loi Quoc’s name on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay transfer paperwork and built a house for Mr. Nguu. Meanwhile, Mr. Loi Quoc claimed that he entered into vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land transfer with Mr. Hieu and his wife in person, and after vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay transfer, he planted many perennial crops. In vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case file, there is only a “Permanent Transfer Paper” dated January 16, 1976 with Mr. Loi Quoc’s name in vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay purchaser side. vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court and appellate court are not well-grounded to determine that vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house and land in hamlet 2, Dong village, Dong Hoa commune, Thuan An district, Song Be province (old name) is vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate of Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu for distribution of inheritance just solely based on depositions of plaintiffs and confirmation of Mr. Hieu on March 8, 1996 (case file p.33). Therefore, more verification is needed associated with vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay transfer of land hamlet 2, Dong village, Dong Hoa commune, Thuan An district, Song Be province (old name). If there is no other evidence to prove that Mr. Chuong spent his money to purchase vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land, it is supposed to consider Mr. Quoc as vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay purchaser. Furthermore, Mr. Quoc concurred with Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu to build a house for Mr. Nguu, therefore, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house and precinct (managed by Mr. Nguu) should be determined as estate of Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu for distribution of inheritance. And Mr. Loi Quoc should be determined as vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay person having right to use associated with vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay remaining land plot (for growing of perennial crops). Regarding vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land plot for growing of annual crops, further verification is needed to specify vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay person who has directly cultivated thereon and paid taxes to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay state and whether he/she obtains a land use right certificate in accordance with land law and policies.

With reference to property in kind: In fact, Mr. Loi Quoc has directly managed and lived in vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 8/18, Co Giang Street so far, he also spent his own money to repair vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house and has settled there; Mr. Loi Nguu has managed and lived in vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house in hamlet 2, Dong village, Dong Hoa commune since 1976, Mr. Hai, Mr. Ha and Mrs. Muoi have settled in Ho Chi Minh City and request inheritance portions in cash (case file p.34, 35, 36). Therefore, to avoid unnecessary disturbance related to housing of litigants, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court must verify vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay dwelling need of litigants for reasonable distribution of property in kind and in conformity with real circumstance. In addition, Mr. Quoc has lived in vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 8/18, Co Giang Street with Mr. Chuong and Mrs. Diu and put considerable effort in taking care of their parent while they were alive and cover funeral expenses when they died and also repaired and restored this house. Therefore, before distribution of inheritance, Mr. Quoc may receive a sum of money deducted from vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate value equivalent to his effort to ensure his interests.

Furthermore, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay valuation of estate was conducted by vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court in 1995, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay prices of land and houses now considerably varies, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay re-valuation is needed to ensure vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay interests of litigants and in conformity with real circumstance. In addition, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case had been suspended since 1997, further verification is needed relevant to changes in litigants for sufficient grounds to settle vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case.

Alternatively, while vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance and appellate courts heard vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case, Mr. Loi Phu and Mr. Loi Tan were residing in vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay USA. Therefore, further verification is needed to determine nationality of Mr. Loi Phu and Mr. Loi Tan to applyResolution No. 1037/2006/NQ-UBTVQH11dated July 27, 2006 of Standing Committee of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay National Assembly on housing-related civil transactions established before July 1, 1991 with involvement of overseas Vietnamese.

According to abovementioned documents and evidence, pursuant to Clause 3 Article 291; Clause 3 Article 297; Clause 1,2 Article 299 ofvtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code, Resolution No. 1037/2006/NQ-UBTVQH11 dated July 27, 2006 of Standing Committee of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay National Assembly on housing-related civil transactions established before July 1, 1991 with involvement of overseas Vietnamese;

HEREBY DECIDES

Accept vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appeal No. 32/KNDS dated September 16, 1997 of Chief Justice of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court and quash vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate judgment No. 183/DSPT dated October 1, 1996 of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Court of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court of Ho Chi Minh City and vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance judgment No. 07/DSST dated March 12, 1996 of People’s Court of Song Be province (old name); refer vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case file to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People’s Court of Binh Duong province for first instance re-trial as per vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay law.

^{____________________________________________}

- Grounds for quashing vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance judgment and appellate judgment:

1. There are inadequate substantial grounds for determining estate as stated in vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance judgment and appellate judgment;

2. Re-valuation of estate is needed;

3. Further verification of changes in litigants and their requests is needed;

4. Further verification of nationality of persons with relevant rights and obligations is needed.

- Reasons for quashing vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance judgment and appellate judgment:

1. Inadequacies in taking and verification of items of evidence;

2. vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay duration of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case has been prolonged.